Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thaxton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vizzier-Thaxton, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thaxton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vizzier-Thaxton, Y
Poultry Science, Vol 85, Issue 5, 819-824
Copyright © 2006 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Stocking density and physiological adaptive responses of broilers

JP Thaxton, WA Dozier 3rd, SL Branton, GW Morgan, DW Miles, WB Roush, BD Lott, and Y Vizzier-Thaxton

Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762, USA. pthaxton@poultry.msstate.edu

Three trials were conducted to assess the effects of stocking density on physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Male broilers were reared in floor pens under conditions similar to those used commercially in the United States. Accepted indicators of adaptation to a stressor were measured on d 49 including plasma concentrations of corticosterone, glucose, cholesterol, and total nitrites as an indicator of nitric oxide, as well as heterophil:lymphocyte ratio. In trial 1, calculated stocking densities were 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, and 55 kg of BW/ m2 and in trials 2 and 3, stocking densities were 30, 35, 40, and 45 kg of BW/m2. Stocking densities were calculated based on a final BW of 3.3 kg. Linear trend analyses were used to assess the role of stocking density on each of the physiological parameters. Results indicate that stocking density did not cause physiological adaptive changes indicative of stress.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
S. Buijs, L. Keeling, S. Rettenbacher, E. Van Poucke, and F. A. M. Tuyttens
Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2009; 88(8): 1536 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
I. Madec, J.-F. Gabarrou, D. Moulin, L. Bougrat, C. Lecuelle-Lafont, J. Gigante, and P. Pageat
Effects of a semiochemical on feed conversion index and related indicators on fast-growing broilers housed during forty-two days
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2009; 88(2): 251 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. G. Scanes
Perspectives on Analytical Techniques and Standardization
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2175 - 2177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
I. Estevez
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.