Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehaffey, J.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehaffey, J.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, C.
Poultry Science, Vol 85, Issue 5, 902-908
Copyright © 2006 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Meat quality evaluation of minimally aged broiler breast fillets from five commercial genetic strains

JM Mehaffey, SP Pradhan, JF Meullenet, JL Emmert, McKee SR, and CM Owens

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.

A total of 1,040 birds from 5 common commercial genetic broiler strains were raised and processed to analyze the effect of strain and deboning time on meat quality. The birds were processed at either 6 or 7 wk of age in 4 replications each. Carcasses were deboned at either 2 or 4 h postmortem (PM; n = 52 birds per treatment). Carcass and breast weights were measured on each bird to calculate breast yield. Muscle pH was measured at time of deboning. Fillets deboned at 4 h PM were measured for length, width, and height to evaluate footprint analysis. At 24 h PM, fillets were weighed to calculate drip loss, and color (L*) was also measured. The fillets were then cooked to 76 degrees C, and cook loss was calculated. Fillets were then subjected to shear analysis using the Meullenet-Owens razor shear method where shear energy (N x mm) was calculated to evaluate tenderness. The strains in this study were chosen for differences in yield; therefore, as expected, breast yield was significantly different among strains. Variation in meat quality attributes existed among strains deboned at 2 h PM, but there was no consistent relationship between meat quality and breast yield. However, at 4 h PM, fewer differences among strains existed in meat quality characteristics (tenderness, water holding capacity, and pH). As expected, deboning at 2 h PM resulted in higher shear energy, higher muscle pH, and lower L* value compared with deboning at 4 h PM in all but one strain. However, water-holding capacity was not affected by deboning time at either age interval. Footprint analysis showed that most differences among strains were in heights measured at the fillet midpoint and caudal end. These results suggest that early deboning may affect meat quality of broiler strains differently, resulting in greater variation within the industry.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
A. Saha, A. V. S. Perumalla, Y. Lee, J. F. Meullenet, and C. M. Owens
Tenderness, moistness, and flavor of pre- and postrigor marinated broiler breast fillets evaluated by consumer sensory panel
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2009; 88(6): 1250 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
I. Madec, J.-F. Gabarrou, D. Moulin, L. Bougrat, C. Lecuelle-Lafont, J. Gigante, and P. Pageat
Effects of a semiochemical on feed conversion index and related indicators on fast-growing broilers housed during forty-two days
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2009; 88(2): 251 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
A. P. S. Moreira, A. Giombelli, R. A. Labanca, D. L. Nelson, and M. B. A. Gloria
Effect of Aging on Bioactive Amines, Microbial Flora, Physico-Chemical Characteristics, and Tenderness of Broiler Breast Meat
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2008; 87(9): 1868 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.