|
|
||||||||
IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH, AND DISEASE |
Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Science Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
2 Corresponding author: huff{at}uark.edu
Two studies were conducted to determine the efficacy of bacteriophage SPR02 and DAF6 at varying titers to treat colibacillosis in chickens. In Study 1, the treatments consisted of a control, i.m. injection of bacteriophage SPR02 or DAF6, Escherichia coli airsac challenge, and E. coli challenge followed by treatment at different titers with bacteriophage SPR02 or DAF6. The E. coli-challenged birds were injected with 6 x 104 cfu into the left thoracic airsac at 7 d of age. Immediately after the birds were challenged with E. coli, they were treated by administration of bacteriophage SPR02 or DAF6 by i.m. injection into the left thigh with 4 x 108, 106, 104, or 102 pfu. Study 2 was identical to Study 1, with the exception that the E. coli challenge was increased to 9 x 104 cfu, and the titers of SPR02 and DAF6 were slightly less at 3 x 108, 106, 104, and 102 pfu. Both studies were concluded when the birds were 3 wk of age. Mortality in the birds challenged with E. coli in Studies 1 and 2 was 48 and 47%, respectively. The only consistently effective bacteriophage treatment was the highest titer (108 pfu) of bacteriophage SPR02, which significantly reduced mortality from 48 and 47% in the birds only challenged with E. coli (positive control) to 7% in both studies, which was not significantly different from the unchallenged negative control treatments. These studies indicate that an effective multiplicity of infection for i.m. treatment with SPR02 was 104 in this experimental model of colibacillosis. Bacteriophage administered at sufficient titers can be effective therapeutic agents and provide an alternative to antibiotics in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
Key Words: bacteriophage therapy Escherichia coli chicken colibacillosis
1 Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |