Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2006. 85:1449-1456
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fassbinder-Orth, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karasov, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fassbinder-Orth, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karasov, W. H.

PHYSIOLOGY, ENDOCRINOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Effects of Feed Restriction and Realimentation on Digestive and Immune Function in the Leghorn Chick

C. A. Fassbinder-Orth*,1 and W. H. Karasov{dagger}

* Department of Zoology and {dagger} Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706

1 Corresponding author: fassbinderor{at}wisc.edu

How regulatory changes of digestive and immune functions of the gut influence each other has not been sufficiently studied. We tested for simultaneous changes in the digestive physiology and mucosal immune function of the guts of White Leghorn cockerel chicks undergoing food restriction and realimentation. Chicks were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control = fed ad libitum 7 to 17 d of age; restricted = feed restricted d 12 to 17 (at 2 restriction levels: 54 and 34% ad libitum); refed = feed restricted d 7 to 13 and then fed ad libitum d 14 to 17. Refed chicks exhibited 1 d of hyperphagy and an increase in apparent digestive efficiency following restriction (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Total small intestine mass and duodenal maltase activity differed among the groups in the order refed > control > restricted, as expected (ANOVA, P < 0.05 for both measures). In contrast, there were no significant treatment effects on our measures of gut immune structure and function, including bursa mass, spleen mass, and total IgA content of intestinal flush samples measured with standard ELISA techniques. The results of this study indicated that, during feed restriction and realimentation, some features of gut immune function are maintained unchanged in the face of regulatory changes that influence digestive functions.

Key Words: food restriction • realimentation • digestive efficiency • mucosal immune system • compensatory growth




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Brzek, K. Kohl, E. Caviedes-Vidal, and W. H. Karasov
Developmental adjustments of house sparrow (Passer domesticus) nestlings to diet composition
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2009; 212(9): 1284 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
E. R. Gilbert, H. Li, D. A. Emmerson, K. E. Webb Jr, and E. A. Wong
Dietary Protein Quality and Feed Restriction Influence Abundance of Nutrient Transporter mRNA in the Small Intestine of Broiler Chicks
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 262 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.