|
|
||||||||
PRODUCTION, MODELING, AND EDUCATION |



* Iowa State University, Ames 50011;
University of Maryland, College Park 20742;
Rose Acres Farms, Seymour, IN 47274; and
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
1 Corresponding author: wpowers{at}iastate.edu
The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a reduced-emission (RE) diet containing 6.9% of a CaSO4-zeolite mixture and slightly reduced CP to 21-, 38-, and 59-wk-old Hy-Line W-36 hens (trials 1, 2, and 3, respectively) on egg production and emissions of NH3, H2S, NO, NO2, CO2, CH4, and non-CH4 total hydrocarbons as compared with feeding a commercial (CM) diet. At each age, 640 hens were allocated, randomly to 8 environmental chambers for a 3-wk period. On an analyzed basis, the CM diet contained 18.0, 17.0, and 16.2% CP and 0.25, 0.18, and 0.20% S in trials 1, 2, and 3, and the RE diet contained 17.0, 15.5, and 15.6% CP and 0.99, 1.20, and 1.10% S in trials 1, 2, and 3. Diets were formulated to contain similar Ca and P contents. Average daily egg weight (56.3 g), average daily egg production (81%), average daily feed intake (92.4 g), and BW change (23.5 g), across ages, were unaffected by diet (P > 0.05) over the study period. Age effects were observed for all performance variables and NH3 emissions (P < 0.05). In trials 1, 2, and 3, daily NH3 emissions from hens fed the RE diets (185.5, 312.2, and 333.5 mg/bird) were less than emissions from hens fed the CM diet (255.1, 560.6, and 616.3 mg/bird; P < 0.01). Daily emissions of H2S across trials from hens fed the RE diet were 4.08 mg/bird compared with 1.32 mg/bird from hens fed the CM diet (P < 0.01). Diet (P < 0.05) and age (P < 0.05) affected emissions of CO2 and CH4. A diet effect (P < 0.01) on NO emissions was observed. No diet or age effects (P > 0.05) were observed for NO2 or non-CH4 total hydrocarbons. Results demonstrated that diet and layer age influence air emissions from poultry operations.
Key Words: hen air emission diet ammonia hydrogen sulfide
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Applegate, S. Adedokun, W. Powers, and R. Angel Determination of Nutrient Mass Balance in Turkeys Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2477 - 2485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Powers and R. Angel A Review of the Capacity for Nutritional Strategies to Address Environmental Challenges in Poultry Production Poult. Sci., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 1929 - 1938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Applegate, W. Powers, R. Angel, and D. Hoehler Effect of Amino Acid Formulation and Amino Acid Supplementation on Performance and Nitrogen Excretion in Turkey Toms Poult. Sci., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wu-Haan, W. J. Powers, C. R. Angel, C. E. Hale III, and T. J. Applegate Nutrient Digestibility and Mass Balance in Laying Hens Fed a Commercial or Acidifying Diet Poult. Sci., April 1, 2007; 86(4): 684 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |