HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Druyan, S. Articles by Cahaner, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Druyan, S. Articles by Cahaner, A.

Segregation Among Test-Cross Progeny Suggests That Two Complementary Dominant Genes Explain the Difference Between Ascites-Resistant and Ascites-Susceptible Broiler Lines

The Hebrew University, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, PO Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel

¹ Corresponding author: cahaner{at}agri.huji.ac.il

Ascites syndrome (AS) is a major cause of economic losses to the broiler industry. The tendency of broilers to develop AS was found to be heritable, suggesting that selective breeding could provide a solution to this problem. To further elucidate the genetic control of AS, AS-susceptible (AS-S) and AS-resistant (AS-R) lines were established by 3 cycles of divergent selection on pedigree data of AS mortality under AS-inducing conditions. The rapid divergence between the lines suggested the involvement of a major gene with dominance for AS resistance. It was hypothesized that the difference between the lines is controlled by a single dominant gene, denoted A, with AA (and some Aa) individuals in the AS-R line, and aa individuals in the AS-S line. The current study was designed to test this hypothesis by test-crossing heterozygous (Aa) sires from the AS-R line and F₁ from the AS-R x AS-S cross, with recessive homozygous (aa) dams from the AS-S line. A ratio of 1:1 was expected between progeny with AS vs. healthy progeny when reared under AS-inducing conditions. Test-cross progeny of 5 sires from the AS-R line segregated 1:1, indicating that these sires were heterozygous (Aa) in the suggested major gene and thus supporting the hypothesis of a single major gene with dominance of AS resistance. There was segregation among test-cross progeny of 8 F₁ sires, but with a 3:1 ratio of AS progeny to healthy progeny. The 3:1 ratio is expected if the F₁ sires are heterozygous (AaBb) with complementary interaction between the dominant alleles in 2 unlinked major genes. The segregation among test-cross progeny of the 9 heterozygous AS-R sires could also be explained by the same model. These results suggested that 2 major genes are responsible for the difference between the AS-R and AS-S lines. Resource populations derived from these lines will facilitate an efficient genomic search for these 2 genes. Once the alleles of these genes are identified and genotyping tests are developed, breeders will easily be able to select against AS susceptibility.

Key Words: ascites syndrome • divergently selected line • major gene • test cross • complementary gene interaction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Skotarczak, T. Szwaczkowski, K. Molinski, and A. Dobek Mixed Model Studies on Inheritance of Reproductive Traits in Laying Hens - A Bayesian Approach Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 878 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Druyan, Y. Hadad, and A. Cahaner Growth Rate of Ascites-Resistant Versus Ascites-Susceptible Broilers in Commercial and Experimental Lines Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 904 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]