Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2007. 86:2315-2321. doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00123
© 2007 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B. M.

IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH, AND DISEASE

Effect of Probiotic Treatment in Broiler Chicks on Intestinal Macrophage Numbers and Phagocytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis by Abdominal Exudate Cells

S. E. Higgins, G. F. Erf, J. P. Higgins, S. N. Henderson, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez and B. M. Hargis1

Center of Excellence in Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701

1 Corresponding author: bhargis{at}uark.edu

Previous data have indicated that a Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture (FM-B11) is efficacious in reducing Salmonella Enteritidis colonization within 24 h when administered within 1 h of challenge. We hypothesized that the innate immune system, specifically macrophages, may play a role in the observed reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis colonization with probiotic treatment. Day-of-hatch chicks were challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and then treated with the probiotic culture 1 h later. Three other treatment groups were not treated (negative control), challenged only, or treated with probiotic only. In all experiments, probiotic treatment on the day of hatch reduced (P < 0.05) cecal Salmonella Enteritidis recovery as compared with the control treatment. In experiments 1 and 2, immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the presence of macrophages (KUL01+) in the ileum and cecum of 7 to 10 chicks per group at 24 h posttreatment. In experiment 1, the number of macrophages observed per 10,000 µm2 in the ileum of Salmonella Enteritidis-challenged chicks was higher (P < 0.05) than that of nonchallenged chicks (4.87 ± 0.31 vs. 3.05 ± 0.19). In the cecum, there were more (P < 0.05) macrophages per 10,000 µm2 in chicks receiving probiotic treatment without challenge than in negative control chicks (5.32 ± 0.41 vs. 3.66 ± 0.35). However, in experiment 2 we found no differences among treatments in the numbers of macrophages for both the ileum and cecum. Experiments 3 and 4 were performed to evaluate the ability of Sephadex-elicited abdominal exudate cells (AEC) from chicks to phagocytose Salmonella Enteritidis in vitro. Abdominal exudate cells were isolated from the abdominal cavity, maintained in tissue culture plates overnight, and then assayed for phagocytic activity by coincubating with Salmonella Enteritidis. In experiment 3, more (P < 0.05) Salmonella Enteritidis was recovered from AEC derived from probiotic-treated chicks than in any other treatment. However, in experiment 4, all treatments resulted in similar levels of elicited AEC, and phagocytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis was at low levels in all groups. Although not conclusive, the modest differences detected in experiments 1 and 3, and the fact that those differences were not repeatedly detectable, suggest that these macrophage-related changes were not solely responsible for the reductions of Salmonella Enteritidis following probiotic treatment.

Key Words: Salmonella • probiotic • macrophage • chick • phagocytosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
V. Janardhana, M. M. Broadway, M. P. Bruce, J. W. Lowenthal, M. S. Geier, R. J. Hughes, and A. G. D. Bean
Prebiotics Modulate Immune Responses in the Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue of Chickens
J. Nutr., July 1, 2009; 139(7): 1404 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
B. Vila, A. Fontgibell, I. Badiola, E. Esteve-Garcia, G. Jimenez, M. Castillo, and J. Brufau
Reduction of Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis colonization and invasion by Bacillus cereus var. toyoi inclusion in poultry feeds
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2009; 88(5): 975 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Poultry Science Association.