HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, D. P. Articles by Ingram, K. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, D. P. Articles by Ingram, K. D.

Effect of External or Internal Fecal Contamination on Numbers of Bacteria on Prechilled Broiler Carcasses¹

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30605

² Corresponding author: douglas.smith{at}ars.usda.gov

During processing, fecal material may contact broiler carcasses externally or internally. A study was conducted to determine the effect of external vs. internal fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria on broiler carcasses. In each of 3 trials, 12 carcasses just prior to evisceration were obtained from a commercial processing plant, placed on a shackle line, and eviscerated with commercial equipment in a pilot scale processing plant. Also, approximately 20 intestinal tracts were collected from the processing plant; then cecal contents were collected and pooled. One gram of cecal content was placed on the exterior breast skin (external), inside the carcass cavity (internal), or not applied (control). All carcasses were held 10 min, then placed on the shackle line and passed through a commercial inside-outside bird washer set at 552 kPa, 5 s dwell time, using approximately 189 L per min of tap water at ambient temperature. After a 1-min drip, whole carcass rinses were conducted on each carcass, and coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter counts were determined and reported as log cfu/mL of rinse. External carcass contamination resulted in significantly higher (P < 0.05) coliform, E. coli, and Campylobacter numbers than internal contamination (5.0 vs. 4.5, 4.9 vs. 4.2, and 3.6 vs. 2.6, respectively). Control carcass counts were significantly lower than external or internal carcass contamination counts for coliforms (3.7), E. coli (3.6), and Campylobacter (2.2). External contamination resulted in higher numbers of bacteria after carcass washing, but carcasses with internal contamination still have higher numbers of bacteria after washing than carcasses without applied contamination.

Key Words: fecal contamination • inside-outside bird washer • coliform • Escherichia coli • Campylobacter

¹ Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Lefebvre, M. Gattuso, H. Moisan, F. Malouin, and M. S. Diarra Genotype comparison of sorbitol-negative Escherichia coli isolates from healthy broiler chickens from different commercial farms Poult. Sci., July 1, 2009; 88(7): 1474 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Miranda, B. I. Vazquez, C. A. Fente, J. Barros-Velazquez, A. Cepeda, and C. M. Franco Evolution of Resistance in Poultry Intestinal Escherichia coli During Three Commonly Used Antimicrobial Therapeutic Treatments in Poultry Poult. Sci., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 1643 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]