|
|
||||||||
IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH AND DISEASE |

* Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; and
Cobb Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761
1 Corresponding author: bhargis{at}uark.edu
We evaluated the effect of a Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture (FM-B11) for reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis in neonatal broiler chicks. In all experiments, chicks were challenged with approximately 104 cfu of Salmonella Enteritidis upon arrival at our laboratory, and the treatments were administered 1 h postchallenge. Cecal tonsil samples were obtained 24 h posttreatment and enriched for Salmonella Enteritidis recovery. The first experiment compared the effects of oral administration of doses of 104, 106, and 108 cfu/chick. In this experiment, doses of 106 and 108 both significantly reduced Salmonella Enteritidis recovery compared with controls (15 vs. 85% Salmonella Enteritidis positive), but 104 cfu did not significantly reduce Salmonella Enteritidis recovery. The second experiment compared the efficacy of oral administration of the live probiotic culture, with or without supernatant removed, to inactivated cultures or supernatant alone. Live probiotic organisms, with or without supernatant, significantly reduced Salmonella Enteritidis in this experiment, but inactivated or cell-free treatments did not reduce Salmonella Enteritidis. In the final 2 experiments, differing doses of probiotic culture were administered on the vent lips, where the treatment was taken into the lower gastrointestinal tract via cloacal drinking. Concentrations of probiotic culture from 102 to 107 cfu/chick significantly reduced Salmonella Enteritidis, and there was no difference in Salmonella Enteritidis recovery between treatment concentrations. These data suggest that this Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture may be efficacious for reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis in neonatal chicks.
Key Words: probiotic Salmonella Lactobacillus cloacal drinking chick
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. W. Lee, S. H. Lee, H. S. Lillehoj, G. X. Li, S. I. Jang, U. S. Babu, M. S. Park, D. K. Kim, E. P. Lillehoj, A. P. Neumann, et al. Effects of direct-fed microbials on growth performance, gut morphometry, and immune characteristics in broiler chickens Poult. Sci., February 1, 2010; 89(2): 203 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jiang, G. Schatzmayr, M. Mohnl, and T. J. Applegate Net effect of an acute phase response--Partial alleviation with probiotic supplementation Poult. Sci., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 28 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Mountzouris, P. Tsitrsikos, I. Palamidi, A. Arvaniti, M. Mohnl, G. Schatzmayr, and K. Fegeros Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition Poult. Sci., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 58 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sato, K. Takahashi, M. Tohno, Y. Miura, T. Kamada, S. Ikegami, and H. Kitazawa Immunomodulation in gut-associated lymphoid tissue of neonatal chicks by immunobiotic diets Poult. Sci., December 1, 2009; 88(12): 2532 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Vila, A. Fontgibell, I. Badiola, E. Esteve-Garcia, G. Jimenez, M. Castillo, and J. Brufau Reduction of Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis colonization and invasion by Bacillus cereus var. toyoi inclusion in poultry feeds Poult. Sci., May 1, 2009; 88(5): 975 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Flint and M. R. Garner Feeding beneficial bacteria: A natural solution for increasing efficiency and decreasing pathogens in animal agriculture J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(2): 367 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |