Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2008. 87:1649-1658. doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00521
© 2008 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, D. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, D. U.

PROCESSING, PRODUCTS, AND FOOD SAFETY

Effect of Ethylenediaminetetraacetate and Lysozyme on the Antimicrobial Activity of Ovotransferrin Against Listeria monocytogenes

K. Y. Ko*, A. F. Mendonca{dagger} and D. U. Ahn*,1

* Department of Animal Science, and {dagger} Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

1 Corresponding author: duahn{at}iastate.edu

This study evaluated the effect of EDTA and lysozyme on the antibacterial activities of activated ovotransferrin against 5 strains of Listeria monocytogenes. First, a disc test was performed to screen the concentrations of EDTA or lysozyme that showed antibacterial activities in ovotransferrin (O) or ovotransferrin in 100 mM NaHCO3 (OS) solution. Turbidity and viability tests were conducted using O or OS solution combined with either lysozyme (OL and OSL) or EDTA (OE and OSE). Also, OS combined with 2 mg/mL of lysozyme (OSL) or 1 mg/mL of EDTA (OSLE), or both, was applied on commercial hams to determine if the solutions show antibacterial activities on meat products. The effect of initial cell population on the antibacterial activities of ovotransferrin combined with either EDTA or lysozyme was also determined. The L. monocytogenes started to grow after 1 d of incubation in the presence of >2.0 mg/mL of lysozyme. The OL groups showed weak antibacterial activities against L. monocytogenes in brain heart infusion broth culture, and their activities were bacteriostatic. The OSL groups were bactericidal against L. monocytogenes, resulting in 1 log reduction from initial cell population. Even though OSL showed stronger antibacterial activity than OS, lysozyme had no significant effect on antibacterial activity of OS against L. monocytogenes. Also, EDTA itself at 1.0 and 2.0 mg/mL was bacteriostatic against 5 strains of L. monocytogenes. They were more susceptible to EDTA than lysozyme, and OSE1 and OSE2 had bactericidal activity against L. monocytogenes. There was a significant difference in the survivor cell populations between OS and OSE groups (P < 0.05). Therefore, EDTA enhanced the antibacterial activity of OS against L. monocytogenes. However, ovotransferrin plus either lysozyme or EDTA, or both, did not show any antibacterial effect in commercial hams during storage at 10°C. In addition, the initial population of L. monocytogenes cells influenced the antibacterial activity of OSL or OSE.

Key Words: ovotransferrin • antibacterial activity • ethylenediaminetetraacetate • lysozyme • Listeria monocytogenes







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Poultry Science Association.