Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2009. 88:2026-2032. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00120
© 2009 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C.

ENVIRONMENT, WELL-BEING, AND BEHAVIOR

Utilizing fungus myceliated grain for molt induction and performance in commercial laying hens1

W. L. Willis*,2, O. S. Isikhuemhen{dagger}, J. W. Allen*, A. Byers*, K. King* and C. Thomas*

* Department of Animal Sciences, and {dagger} Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro 27411

2 Corresponding author: willisw{at}ncat.edu

Molting in poultry is used to rejuvenate hens for a second or third laying cycle. Feed withdrawal was once the most effective method used for molt induction; however, it has being phased out due to food safety and animal welfare concerns. This study evaluated the utilization of fungus myceliated grain as a safe and effective alternative for inducing molt, enhancing immunity, reducing Salmonella growth, and returning to egg production. Laying hens were subjected to 1 of 5 treatments: 1) nonfed (NF), 2) full-fed (FF), 3) fungus myceliated meal (FM), 4) 90% fungus myceliated meal + 10% standard layer ration (FM-90), and 5) 90% alfalfa meal + 10% fungus myceliated meal (AF-90). Each treatment condition was replicated 9 times during a 9-d molt period. The results revealed that egg production for treatments 1 and 3 ceased completely by d 5, whereas hens in treatments 4 and 5 ceased egg production by d 6. The percentage of BW loss decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in treatments 1 (57%), 2 (8%), 3 (35%), 4 (37%), and 5 (44%). Ovary weights of hens fed all molting diets decreased significantly from the full-fed control but did not differ significantly (P < 0.05) from each other. Salmonella population in the crop, ovary, and ceca from hens differed significantly (P < 0.05) among treatments. Return to egg production differed between treatments with higher production beginning in treatment 3 and ending in treatment 5. Antibody titers did differ (P < 0.05) among treatments. From these results, fungus myceliated meal appears to be a viable alternative to conventional feed withdrawal and other methods for the successful induction of molt and retention of postmolt performance.

Key Words: molting layer • fungus myceliated grain • Salmonella • weight loss

1 Research was supported by Evans-Allen funding through the USDA-Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, Washington, DC.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Poultry Science Association.