Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2009. 88:2360-2367. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00037
© 2009 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, C. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, C. M.

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION

The effect of Grobiotic-P combined with yeast cell wall and gluconic acid on growth performance, nutrient digestibilities, and cecal microbial populations in young chicks

C. M. Jacobs and C. M. Parsons1

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana 61801

1 Corresponding author: poultry{at}illinois.edu

Two experiments were conducted with New Hampshire x Columbian chicks fed a corn-soybean meal diet to examine the efficacy of varying levels and combinations of Grobiotic P (GB), a prebiotic-type product that contains dairy and yeast fractions and dried fermentation extracts, gluconic acid, and yeast cell wall (YCW) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and cecal microbial populations. In experiment 1, chicks were allowed ad libitum access to a corn-soybean meal basal diet or the basal diet supplemented with 2 or 4% GB, 1.5 or 3% gluconic acid, 0.2% YCW, or various 2-way combinations of the supplements in place of dextrose and arenaceous flour. In experiment 2, the same supplement combinations were used as in experiment 1; however, the 3% gluconic acid supplement was eliminated. In both experiments, supplementing GB, YCW, or 1.5% gluconic acid to the diet had no consistent effect on growth performance except that the weight gain was depressed (P < 0.05) when the chicks were fed a diet containing 3% gluconic acid. Chicks fed diets containing 2 or 4% GB combinations showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in MEn at 21 d when compared with chicks fed the basal diet. For amino acid (AA) digestibility, 2% GB combined with 0.2% YCW or 1.5% gluconic acid resulted in a reduction (P < 0.05) in AA digestibility at 7 d; however, at 21 d, these combinations increased (P < 0.05) digestibility of all AA. There was no consistent effect of dietary treatment on cecal bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, Escherichia coli, or Clostridium perfringens populations or cecal pH. These experiments indicated that diets containing GB generally increased MEn and AA digestibility at 21 d and that the prebiotic combinations had no consistent effects on cecal microbial populations.

Key Words: Grobiotic • yeast cell wall • gluconic acid • prebiotic • chick







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Poultry Science Association.