Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2009. 88:309-315. doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00224
© 2009 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, K.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, C.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, K.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, C.-W.

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION

Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers

K.-L. Chen*, W.-L. Kho*, S.-H. You*, R.-H. Yeh*, S.-W. Tang* and C.-W. Hsieh{dagger},1

* Department of Animal Science, National Chiayi University, Taiwan; and {dagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Chiayi University, Taiwan

1 Corresponding author: cwhsieh{at}mail.ncyu.edu.tw

Bacillus subtilis var. natto N21 (Bac; for greater proteolytic capacity) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y10 (Sac; for greater acidic capacity) were applied to produce a 2-stage combined fermentation feed. This study investigated whether the enhancement of Bac+Sac fermented feed on broiler growth performance was due to the probiotics per se or due to the fermentation process. Trial 1 included 1-d-old broiler chicks (n =144) randomly assigned to control, water added (same as in the fermentation feed, 23%), and Bac+Sac fermented feed (FBac+Sac) treatments with 4 replicates. Trial 2 included 21-d-old broiler chickens (n = 12) assigned into control and FBac+Sac groups for a metabolic trial for nutrient availability. Trial 3 included 1-d-old male broiler chicks (n = 216) randomly assigned into 6 treatments with 3 replicates. Treatments included a control, Sac fermented feed (FSac), FBac+Sac, Bac powder (PBac), Sac powder (PSac), and Bac+Sac powder (PBac+Sac). The results from trial 1 showed that FBac+Sac increased BW and feed intake (P < 0.05) in 21- and 39-d-old chickens. The water-added group showed decreased BW, weight gain, and feed intake (P < 0.05). Trial 2 showed that FBac+ Sac increased gross energy availability (P < 0.05). Trial 3 showed that FBac+Sac increased 21- and 39-d-old BW and weight gain (P < 0.05). Diets supplemented with probiotic powder or fermented with Sac did not improve broiler growth performance (P > 0.05). The growth performance improvement of the FBac+Sac treatment was probably not due to the added water, probiotic powder inclusion, or through single-strain fermentation, but due to the 2-stage fermentation process using Bac and Sac strains.

Key Words: Bacillus subtilis var. nattoSaccharomyces cerevisiae • fermented feed • broiler







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Poultry Science Association.