Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2009. 88:1257-1265. doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00273
© 2009 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lakins, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brashears, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lakins, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brashears, M. M.

PROCESSING, PRODUCTS, AND FOOD SAFETY

Comparison of quality attributes of shell eggs subjected to directional microwave technology

D. G. Lakins*, C. Z. Alvarado*,1, A. M. Luna*, S. F. O’Keefe{dagger}, J. B. Boyce{ddagger}, L. D. Thompson*, M. T. Brashears§, J. C. Brooks* and M. M. Brashears*

* Department of Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Box 42141, Lubbock 79409; {dagger} Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Box 0418, Blacksburg 24061; {ddagger} Nutrition, Hospitality, and Retailing, MS1162, Lubbock, TX 79409; and § Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, Texas Tech University, Box 42131, Lubbock 79409

1 Corresponding author: christine.alvarado{at}ttu.edu

Microwaves have been shown to cause thermal as well as nonthermal destruction of pathogens such as Salmonella, which can be found in shell eggs. The objective of this study was to determine if using microwave technology would cause detrimental quality effects in shell eggs. Treatments included control (no treatment) and microwave-treated (20 s) shell eggs. There were no differences in mineral content, fatty acid profile, Haugh units, broken-out score, yolk index, emulsion stability, pH of whole egg, and foaming capacity between 2 treatments (P ≥ 0.05). At 0 and 30 d, there were no noticeable differences in H2O activity between 2 treatments. The foaming stability and albumen thermocoagulation of microwave-treated eggs were significantly higher than control eggs (P ≤ 0.05). The control eggs had significantly higher emulsion capacity and lower vitelline membrane strength than the microwave-treated eggs (P ≤ 0.05). Poached eggs were evaluated by sensory testing for hardness, yolk color, and albumen color, and there are no noticeable differences at 0, 15, or 30 d. At 0 d, the color of control albumen was more yellow than the microwave-treated albumen, and the chalazae of the microwave-treated eggs was more attached than the control eggs (P ≤ 0.05). The TBA reactive substances were similar for 2 treatments at 0, 15, and 30 d. Peroxide values were significantly higher in the microwave-treated eggs at d 0 (P ≤ 0.05), but at 15 and 30 d, no prominent differences in peroxide values were noted (P ≥ 0.05). Therefore, microwave technology can be applied to shell eggs without causing detrimental effects to quality.

Key Words: shell egg • quality • directional microwave • Salmonella • oxidation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Poultry Science Association.