Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2007. 86:2289-2290. doi:10.3382/ps.2007-86-11-2289
© 2007 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanes, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanes, C. G.

EDITORIAL

Contribution of Poultry to Quality of Life and Economic Development in the Developing World1

C. G. Scanes, Editor-in-Chief

The United Nations Millennium Goals (http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/#) call for the halving the number of hungry people by 2015; an estimated 824 million people were affected by chronic hunger in 2003. In addition, the goals are to reduce child mortality (under-five mortality in sub-Saharan Africa being presently 168 per 1,000 births) and improve maternal health. Eggs and poultry meat provide an excellent source of a critically important nutrient, protein, together with minerals and vitamins (e.g., B12).

Poultry are produced worldwide by 3 systems:

In addition, there are alternative systems, including free range and organic.

In developing countries, traditional village-scavenging poultry make up a significant proportion of poultry in the national flock or continent flock. This is similar to "backyard" or "farm yard" poultry in Europe and North America, which have decreased, but are still evident. In the rural areas of Vietnam, there are estimated to be 86 million chickens and 29 million ducks; three-fourths of all poultry are maintained in the traditional village system. Similarly, in Tanzania in East Africa, there are estimated to be 26.6 million scavenging chickens and 1.2 million other poultry, mainly ducks (http://www.kyeemafoundation.org/rural_poultry/index.html; accessed March 2007). In 1997, it was estimated that 70% of African poultry (1.5 billion chickens) and between 15 (Malaysia) and 98% (Vietnam) of poultry in Asian countries were of the traditional village-scavenging type (Kitalyi, 1997). With the development of a commercial poultry industry particularly in Asia, these figures are undoubtedly overestimates.

Village poultry contribute significantly to poverty alleviation and the improvement of food security. They provide a source of high-quality protein. "Village chicken products are often the only source of animal protein for resource-poor households. Eggs are a source of high-quality protein for sick and malnourished children under the age of five." "Estimates based on human and livestock populations in Ethiopia showed that the village chicken provides 12.5 kg of poultry meat per capita per year, whereas cattle provide only 5.34 kg" (Kitalyi, 1997). Moreover, poultry products can be sold or bartered to provide a source of income. This may be one of the few, or only, sources of cash income. Another advantage of traditional poultry is that it is said that women and children own and are responsible for the poultry (http://www.kyeemafoundation.org/rural_poultry/index.html). However, there are marked differences in ownership and management between different countries and communities.

Are there issues or concerns with traditional village poultry production?

  1. Despite the impact of poultry in poverty alleviation, there has been a lack of research to improve the efficiency of traditional poultry production (Kitalyi, 1997). There is tremendous scope for such improvements (see Table 1Go for estimates of the present performance productivity in the traditional village system). It might be argued that poultry have not received the attention they deserve from international research centers.
  2. Traditional village poultry production is not efficient and has low productivity (see Table 1Go). There has been little improvement in the number of eggs produced per layer for the last 40 years, and competition with commercial poultry production is likely to increase. Semi-commercial production is a "half-way house" to being a grower in a vertically integrated system.
  3. The lack of infrastructure supporting poultry in a country or region, including the lack of availability of critical nutrients such as vitamins and of veterinary services or poultry health programs including vaccines. A corollary of this is that traditional village poultry is a potential reservoir for diseases including zoonotic diseases, and there are inadequate veterinary services to recognize when a disease outbreak occurs.
  4. There is an interesting "yin and yang" of traditional village poultry production. The existence of flocks of chickens spread across the world offers a tremendous source of genetic diversity and potentially interesting DNA to be incorporated into commercial founder lines. However, the antithesis of this is that these poultry have not been subject to successful genetic improvement and are little studied.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Estimates of the productivity of traditional village poultry production (based on Kitalyi, 1997) compared with a commercial system in the developed world
 
In conclusion, tradition poultry production is making a difference to poverty alleviation, but there is scope for even greater impacts of poultry on poverty alleviation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The Council of Science Editors (www.councilscienceeditors.org) has organized a Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development for release in October 2007. Science journals throughout the world will simultaneously publish papers on this topic of worldwide interest to raise awareness, stimulate interest, and stimulate research into poverty and human development. The Global Theme Issue is an international collaboration of journals from developed and developing countries. This editorial represents our contribution to this important global effort. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
FAO Animal Health and Production Division. 2006. Livestock Atlas Series. 1. Global livestock geography: New perspectives on global resources. http://ergodd.zoo.ox.ac.uk/livatl2/index.htm Accessed Mar. 2007.

Farrelly, L. L. 1996. Transforming poultry production and marketing in developing countries: Lessons learned with implications for sub-Saharan Africa. International Development Working Papers 63, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing; http://ideas.repec.org/p/msu/idpwrk/063.html Accessed Mar. 2007.

Kitalyi, A. J. 1997. Village chicken production systems in developing countries: What does the future hold? World Anim. Rev. 89. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W6437T/w6437t07.htm Accessed Mar. 2007.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanes, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanes, C. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS