|
|
||||||||
PHYSIOLOGY, ENDOCRINOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION: Research Note |


* Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian, EH2 9PS, UK; and
School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
1 Corresponding author: vicky.macrae{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: skeletal muscle myopathy broiler
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Commercial broiler chickens are typically derived from highly selected pedigree great-grandparent lines. In developing and maintaining a commercial strain of broilers from these great-grandparent lines, a balance of features related to growth and reproduction must be considered, which can be influenced by the genetic makeup of the bird (Leeson and Summers, 2000).
The present study compared the breast muscle characteristics of 3 commercial great-grandparent lines (lines A, B, and C). Although all lines have undergone intensive selection for growth-related production traits, distinct differences in their genetic makeup exist. For example, line A is a female line that has been selected for an earlier peak in egg production, but hens in this line do not lay for as long a time period as those in line B, which is a female line with a later egg production peak. Overall, both lines produce the same number of eggs. Line C is a male line and has been selected primarily for growth-related traits. This study compared pectoralis major breast muscle growth, pathology, and fiber morphometry in lines A, B, and C.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At 6 wk of age, the birds were weighed and the blood was sampled. The birds were then euthanized using an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbitone. Each blood sample was transferred to a 5-mL blood collection tube (Teklab, Sacriston, Durham, UK) containing 50 units of Li-heparin anticoagulant and placed on ice. The samples were centrifuged at 1,500 x g (MSE-Mistral 2000R; Sanyo Gallenkamp plc, Leicester, UK) for 5 min. The plasma supernatant was pipetted into plasma tubes and immediately frozen at 20°C. Creatine kinase (CK) activity, a commonly used marker of muscle damage (Yasmineh et al., 1978; Ibrahim et al., 1981), was determined using a kinetic assay (Randox, Crumlin, County Antrim, UK), and was assessed following the manufacturers protocol.
Approximately 2 cm3 muscle samples of the pectoralis major breast muscle were removed from standardized regions of the left side of the bird. The samples were oriented for transverse fiber sectioning and mounted on cork disks using a viscous embedding compound (OCT Tissue-Tek; Sakura, Zoeterwoude, the Netherlands). The muscle blocks were then snap-frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen-cooled Isceon45 (Hotfrost, Edinburgh, UK) and stored at 70°C.
Serial 10-µm sections were cut from the frozen muscle samples on a cryostat (Bright Instruments, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK), stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Massons trichrome, and reacted for reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, myofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase, or nonspecific esterase. A qualitative and descriptive evaluation of muscle pathology was performed on pectoralis major muscle sections from each bird, using adapted human biopsy evaluation forms (Cumming et al., 1994).
The radial muscle fiber size was estimated in sections stained with H&E by measuring the minimum fiber diameter (MFD), using image analysis software (Scion Image for Windows, Scion Corp., Frederick, MD). The MFD is defined as the distance across the narrowest part of the fiber profile passing through the centroid (Dubowitz and Brooke, 1973; Cumming et al., 1994). The amount of connective tissue in sections stained with H&E was estimated by point-counting stereology. However, the amount of connective tissue determined is approximate, because blood vessels and nerves would have been included in the estimation. The MFD (100 fibers) and amount of connective tissue (500 points) were estimated from pectoralis major muscle sections from each bird.
Two-way ANOVA was performed to determine the effect of line. A GLM analysis incorporating pairwise comparisons using Tukeys test was undertaken to compare groups within the ANOVA model. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. This study was undertaken under an appropriate Home Office license and conformed to ethical standards of the Roslin Institute.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
It has been proposed that during the postnatal period, avian muscle growth occurs only by hypertrophy (increased radial growth of muscle fibers) and not by hyperplasia (increased muscle fiber number), with fiber number becoming fixed before or shortly after hatch (Goldspink and Yang, 1999). Genetic selection for increased growth of broiler and broiler great-grandparent muscles, in particular the pectoralis major breast muscle, is associated with increased hypertrophy (MacRae et al., 2006). Selection for increased hypertrophy may be associated with muscle damage caused by radial fiber growth outstripping the support systems and large fibers splitting because of metabolic stress (Mahon, 1999; Kranen et al., 2000; MacRae et al., 2006). However, genetic selection for increased broiler pectoralis major muscle growth also appears to have resulted in a larger muscle fiber number set and greater posthatch growth potential (Remignon et al., 1995). This was also observed in the broiler great-grandparent lines in the present study. The mean breast fillet weight of line A (169 g) was lower than that of lines B (207 g) and C (235 g; P < 0.05). Assessment of muscle sections revealed no differences between lines in either mean fiber size or amount of connective tissue (Table 2
). Therefore, additional fibers must provide the additional weight in the breast fillet of lines B and C, compared with line A. Lines B and C would have attained a given breast weight in a shorter period of time than line A, and would have greater overall growth potential. Again, line B is notable in its ability to match the growth potential of the male line (line C) while maintaining a high reproductive capacity.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication August 3, 2006. Accepted for publication October 9, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dubowitz, V., and M. H. Brooke. 1973. Muscle Biopsy: A Modern Approach. W. B. Saunders, London, UK.
Goldspink, G., and S. Y. Yang. 1999. Muscle structure, development and growth. Pages 318 in Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series. R. I. Richardson and G. C. Mead, ed. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
Ibrahim, G. A., B. A. Zweber, and E. A. Awad. 1981. Muscle and serum enzymes and isoenzymes in muscular dystrophies. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 62:265269.[Web of Science][Medline]
Komulainen, J., and V. Vihko. 1994. Exercise-induced necrotic muscle damage and enzyme release in the four days following prolonged submaximal running in rats. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 428:346351.
Kranen, R. W., E. Lambooy, C. H. Veerkamp, T. H. Kuppevelt, and J. H. Veerkamp. 2000. Histological characterization of hemorrhages in muscles of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 79:110116.
Le Bihan-Duval, E., N. Millet, and H. Remignon. 1999. Broiler meat quality: Effect of selection for increased carcass quality and estimates of genetic parameters. Poult. Sci. 78:822826.
Leeson, S., and J. D. Summers. 2000. Broiler Breeder Production. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
MacRae, V. E., M. Mahon, S. Gilpin, D. A. Sandercock, and M. A. Mitchell. 2006. Skeletal muscle fiber growth and growth associated myopathy in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). Br. Poult. Sci. 47:264272.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mahon, M. 1999. Muscle abnormalitiesMorphological aspects. Pages 1964 in Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series. R. I. Richardson and G. C. Mead, ed. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
Mahon, M., T. Ford, S. Gilpin, C. Nixey, and N. A. French. 1995. Does your Christmas dinner (Meleagris gallopavo) show muscle pathology? Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 21:163.
Mills, L. J. 2001. Skeletal muscle characteristics of commercial and traditional strains of turkey. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mitchell, M. A. 1999. Muscle abnormalitiesPathophysiological mechanisms. Pages 6598 in Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series. R. I. Richardson and G. C. Mead, ed. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
Remignon, H., M. F. Gardahaut, G. Marche, and F. H. Ricard. 1995. Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscle-fibers without changing their typing in chickens. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 16:95102.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sandercock, D. A., R. R. Hunter, G. R. Nute, P. M. Hocking, and M. A. Mitchell. 2001. Acute heat stress-induced alterations in blood acid-base status and skeletal muscle membrane integrity in broiler chickens at two ages: Implications for meat quality. Poult. Sci. 80:418425.
Sante, V., G. Bielicki, M. Renerre, and A. Lacourt. 1991. Post mortem evolution in the pectoralis superficialis muscle from two turkey breeds: Relationship between pH and colour changes. Pages 465468 in Proc. 37th Int. Congr. Meat Sci. Technol., Kulmbach, Germany. Wageningen Acad. Publ., the Netherlands.
Suzuki, A. 1978. Histochemistry of the chicken skeletal muscles. II. Distribution and diameter of three fiber types. Tohoku J. Agric. Res. 29:3843.
Van der Meulen, J. H., H. Kuipers, and J. Drukker. 1991. Relationship between exercise-induced muscle damage and enzyme release in rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 71:9991004.
Yasmineh, W. G., G. A. Ibrahim, M. Abbasnezhad, and E. A. Awad. 1978. Isoenzyme distribution of creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase in serum and skeletal muscle in Du-chenne muscular dystrophy, collagen disease, and other muscular disorders. Clin. Chem. 24:19851989.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Petracci, M. Bianchi, and C. Cavani The European perspective on pale, soft, exudative conditions in poultry Poult. Sci., July 1, 2009; 88(7): 1518 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Husak, J. G. Sebranek, and K. Bregendahl A Survey of Commercially Available Broilers Marketed as Organic, Free-Range, and Conventional Broilers for Cooked Meat Yields, Meat Composition, and Relative Value Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2367 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |