|
|
||||||||
PRODUCTION, MODELING, AND EDUCATION |
MOA Key Laboratory Food Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China, 430070
1 Corresponding author: chengguofu{at}mail.hzau.edu.cn
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: interleukin-6 levofloxacin broiler Staphylococcus aureus arthritis
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The incidence of Staph. aureus arthritis in humans ranges from 0.002 to 0.01% (Goldenberg, 1999). In most cases, human staphylococcal arthritis has been studied using mice or rabbits as experimental animal models (Bremell et al., 1992; Smith et al., 1997). Moreover, experimental chicken models have been developed (Zhu et al., 1990; Wei et al., 1995; Cheng et al., 2003), which have shown that Staph. aureus arthritis in chickens closely resembles the human disease in pathogenesis (Alderson et al., 1986). Studies of chicken models of staphylococcal arthritis may overcome the limitations encountered in humans, such as disease model establishment and tissue sample collection from the synovial membrane and cartilage.
Staphylococcus aureus-induced arthritis is associated with an inflammatory response, and a number of studies have investigated the role of inflammatory cytokines in the infectious process (Bremell et al., 1992; Nakane et al., 1995). Interleukin-6 is one of the most pleiotropic interleukins released at sites of injury or infection (Verdrengh and Tarkowski, 1997). Some investigators have reported that IL-6 can activate osteoclasts and that its release increases the damage of joints during the arthritic process (Green et al., 1994). Increased serum IL-6 levels have been observed throughout the course of Staph. aureus arthritis in several animal models (Bremell et al., 1992; Green et al., 1994). The production of IL-6 has been shown to be highly correlated with death, both in patients with Staph. aureus arthritis and in animal models of the disease (Brouckaert and Fiers, 1996), but there have been only a few reports on the production of IL-6 during Staph. aureus arthritis in chickens. Thus, the present study was undertaken to investigate the role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of Staph. aureus arthritis in a chicken model.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial Strains
The Staph. aureus strain used in this study was originally isolated from a swollen hock joint of a spontaneously arthritic broiler (Huang et al., 2002). This bacterial strain was shown to be ß-hemolysis-, catalase-, and coagulase-positive. The bacteria were cultured on blood agar (5% sheep erythrocytes) for 24 h at 37°C and then reincubated on nutrient agar medium for 18 h at 37°C before inoculation. From the culture, a bacterial suspension was prepared in saline at a concentration of 7.1 x 109 cfu/mL. Viable counts were used to check the concentration of bacteria injected.
Cell Culture
Murine hybriddoma cell line B13.29, which is dependent on IL-6 for growth, has previously been described (Tomas et al., 1992). For IL-6 determination, the more sensitive subclone B9 was used (Diamant et al., 1994). The B9 cells (Laboratory of Animal Virology, Huazhong Agricultural University) were seeded at 2.0 x 105/mL and grown at 37°C, 5% CO2 in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium (RPMI-1640, catalog no. AML17586, HyClone, Logan, UT) containing 1% L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (catalog no. SH30087, HyClone), 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 units/mL of penicillin (catalog no. 2003064, Amresco, Solon, OH), and 1 mg/mL of streptomycin (catalog no. 20030315, Amresco). During routine culture, recombinant human IL-6 (rhIL-6, lot no. 02016, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) was added at 5 units/mL.
Experimental Protocol
At 8 wk of age, the chickens were randomly divided into 4 groups of 30 broilers. Two groups were injected with 0.35 mL of Staph. aureus suspension (7.1 x 109 cfu/ mL) in sterile saline intra-articularly into the right hock joints on d 0, and the other 2 groups were injected in the same way with 0.35 mL of sterile saline. One group in each of the 2 treatment groups was fed levofloxacin (LVFX, catalog no. 20030406, Daming Co., Ltd., Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China) at a dose of 5 mg/kg of BW on the third day post Staph. aureus/saline inoculation (PID) for 4 successive days. Blood samples, 3 mL per broiler, were obtained via the wing-web at selected intervals (0, 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 PID, 8 broilers per time point), centrifuged, then aliquoted equally and stored at 40°C for IL-6 bioassay and ELISA.
Histopathological Examination
The birds were killed 35 d after inoculation of bacteria. After routine fixation, decalcification, and paraffin embedding, the joints were examined histologically for synovial hypertrophy (synovial membrane thickness of more than 2 cell layers), pannus formation (joint cartilage covered with synovial tissue), and destruction of cartilage and subchondral bone.
Chicken IL-6 Bioassay
The chicken IL-6 (chIL-6) activities in serum samples were measured according to their ability to promote growth of the IL-6-dependent murine hybridoma B9 cells (Helle et al., 1991; Rath et al., 1995). The rhIL-6 standard and serum samples (incubated at 56°C for 30 min) were serially diluted (2-fold steps) with RPMI-1640 medium. One hundred microliters of serially diluted serum samples and rhIL-6 standard were added in triplicate to cell cultures at a concentration of 104 cells/100 µL per well in 96-well microculture plates at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 68 h, and 200 µL of assay medium was added to negative-control wells. Then 20 µL of [3-(4,5-dimethylthazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, aliquoted, Amresco), 5 mg/mL in PBS solution, was added to all wells, and the plates were incubated for another 4 h. Finally, 100 µL of the supernatant in each well was removed carefully, and 100 µL of 10% SDS (aliquoted, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 0.02 N HCL was added to each well after mixing slightly on a plate mixer. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The absorbance at 570 nm of each well was measured by a microplate reader. The activities of chIL-6 in serum samples were calculated from a standard curve obtained using rhIL-6. Results were reported as units of chIL-6/ mL of serum. One unit was approximately equal to 1 pg/ mL of the rhIL-6 standard (Straneva et al., 1992).
chIL-6 ELISA
A human IL-6 ELISA kit (Laboratory of Immunology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, China) was used to determine chIL-6 concentrations in serum samples according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, monoclonal antibodies had been applied to 96-well micro-titer plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) by the manufacturer. The rhIL-6 standard and serum samples were added, followed by 2-fold serial dilutions (20 µL/well), and anti-human monoclonal antibody conjugated with biotin (1:100) was added and incubated for 2 h at 25°C. Plates were then washed with washing buffer (PBS-0.05% Tween 20) 4 times for 3 min, and avidin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was added and incubated for 30 min at 25°C. After washing as described above, the color was developed with 3,30,5,50-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB, Sigma) for 10 min and the reaction was stopped with 2.5 N H2SO4. Extinction at 450 nm was measured with a universal microplate reader (ELX800, BioTek, Winooski, VT).
Statistical Analysis
The SPSS program version 12.0 was used for data analysis (Zhang et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2006). Linear correlations between serum chIL-6 activities, as determined by the B9 bioassay, and serum IL-6, as determined by the human IL-6 ELISA, were analyzed. Activities or concentration differences were compared between 2 random groups at the same time point and were compared with d 0 in the same group by 2-way ANOVA. In all cases, differences were considered significant if P
0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum chIL-6 Activity
With the B9 bioassay, serum chIL-6 activities in the Staph. aureus-injected group began to grow from a mean of 4.08 to 9.24 unit/mL at PID 1 (P < 0.01) and reached a maximal mean value of 23.25 unit/mL on PID 14 (P < 0.01). Serum chIL-6 activities in the Staph. aureus-injected group were significantly higher than those in the saline-treated group (P < 0.05 at PID 1, 4, and 28; P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, at PID 7, 14, and 21). In the Staph. aureus + LVFX-treated group, serum chIL-6 activities were slightly reduced (3.90 unit/mL), but increased at PID 14 and reached the maximal mean value of 7.23 unit/mL on PID 28 (P < 0.01) compared with at d 0, and compared with Staph. aureus-injected birds (P < 0.05 at PID 4 and 7; P < 0.01 at PID 14 and 21), but there was no significant difference in serum chIL-6 levels between the broilers injected with saline and those uninfected and treated with LVFX (Table 1
).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, enhanced systemic production of chIL-6 in serum was observed in infected birds when compared with saline-treated birds, similar to the report of Bremell et al. (1992) in a murine model of staphylococcal arthritis. However, the Staph. aureus-infected birds treated with LVFX during the experiment showed reduced levels of chIL-6 in serum, as compared with the Staph. aureus-injected birds. At the same time, chIL-6 levels in the saline-treated group were similar to those in the saline + LVFX-treated group, which indicates that LVFX did not affect endogenous levels of chIL-6. Taken together, these data show a strong involvement of chIL-6 in the pathogenesis of Staph. aureus arthritis in broilers and that it plays a detrimental, damaging role in the infectious process of Staph. aureus arthritis.
Interleukin-6 exerts its effect by binding specific receptors on the cell surface. Interleukin-6 produced by osteoblasts has been shown to modulate the activity of bone-resorptive osteoclasts directly or indirectly, resulting in induction of osteoclast differentiation or osteoclast-mediated bone demineralization (Ishimi et al., 1990; de la Mata et al., 1995; Greenfield et al., 1995). It has also been demonstrated that the levels of tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), and IL-6 in serum are associated with the severity of the infectious process. Additionally, IL-1ß and TNF-
can induce chondrocytes and synovial macrophages to release a high production of IL-6 locally in bone, which consequently increases damage to joints during the arthritic process (Green et al., 1994). In our trial, the chIL-6 level of Staph. aureus-infected chickens rose quickly and the mortality of chickens reached 23.3%, yet the chIL-6 level of Staph. aureus-infected + LVFX-treated chickens remained consistent and the mortality of chickens was decreased (3.3%); hence, we deduced that chIL-6 may be involved in the pathogenesis of S. aureus arthritis as injury in chickens.
Assay Methods of chIL-6
Many different assay systems are available for quantifying the levels of mammalian IL-6 or for detecting cells that express the IL-6 gene. To date, no reports have been found on a standard ELISA for chIL-6, yet recombinant chicken IL-6 was commercially available (www.serotec.com, 2001). Recombinant murine IL-6 or rhIL-6 standards have also been adopted in the quantification of chIL-6 levels with bioassays to establish dose-response curves (Rath et al., 1995; Lynagh et al., 2000; Xie et al., 2000). A functional homologue has been shown to exist between chIL-6 and mammalian IL-6 (Samad et al., 1993; Rath et al., 1995; Schneider et al., 2001). In a previous study (Cheng et al., 2003), we used a human IL-6 ELISA kit to quantify chIL-6 levels during Staph. aureus arthritis.
A standard bioassay for IL-6, which exploits the fact that IL-6 has a proliferative effect on IL-6-dependent B9 cells, has been used to determine whether IL-6 is active (Rath et al., 1995; Lynagh et al., 2000; Xie et al., 2000; Schneider et al., 2001). Rath et al. (1995) first used IL-6-dependent B9 cells and an MTT colorimetric assay to detect chIL-6-like factors in the sera and ascite fluids of chickens. In this study, we measured chIL-6 activities in the sera of healthy broilers, and the average chIL-6 activity values were 4.33 ± 0.75 unit/mL. Similar results were obtained in other studies (Lynagh et al., 2000). Our results showed a positive correlation (r = 0.91) between the ELISA and the B9 bioassay when chIL-6 in serum was measured. These results indicate that a human IL-6 ELISA kit can be used to quantify chIL-6 in the sera of chickens.
Effect of LVFX Treatment on Staph. aureus Arthritis
Levofloxacin, a member of the fluoroquinolone family, possesses excellent potent activity against a wide microbial spectrum. Hu et al. (2002) showed that LVFX was effective in controlling avian staphylococcosis attributable to Staph. aureus when administered in drinking water.
Treatment of LVFX started at PID 3 because broilers showed clinical symptoms at the time, and the doses of LVFX were chosen according to earlier studies (Hu et al., 2002). In the present study, the infected birds treated with LVFX during the experiment showed reduced levels of chIL-6 in serum, as compared with Staph. aureus-injected birds. At the same time, most of the Staph. aureus-injected birds exhibited less severe clinical signs and lesions after receiving LVFX treatment. Brouckaert and Fiers (1996) demonstrated in other experimental animal models that the production of IL-6 is highly correlated with disease severity and mortality. Our previous study suggested that the Staph. aureus strain used in this experiment was very susceptible to LVFX (Li et al., 2004). The reduction of live Staph. aureus in chickens induced a decrease in exotoxin production, which in turn stimulated a reduced production of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-
, IL-1ß, and IL-6 (Bremell et al., 1992; Nakane et al., 1995; Thijs et al., 1996). Therefore, blockage of IL-6 hypersecretion in vivo may be developed as a therapeutic application against Staph. aureus arthritis. In conclusion, the present study clearly demonstrated that chIL-6 participates in the infectious process of Staph. aureus arthritis in broilers and contributes to the pathogenesis of the disease.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication May 30, 2006. Accepted for publication February 21, 2007.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bremell, T., A. Abdelnour, and A. Tarkowski. 1992. Histopathological and serological progression of experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis. Infect. Immun. 60:29762985.
Brouckaert, P., and W. Fiers. 1996. Tumor necrosis factor and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 216:167187.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cheng, G. F., C. Q. Gu, X. Y. Hu, S. Q. Zhou, and N. H. Song. 2003. Study on pathogenesis of experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis in chickensTesting concentrations of TNF-
, IL-6 and RF in serum. Chin. J. Vet. Sci. 23:457459.
de la Mata, J., H. L. Uy, T. A. Guise, B. Story, B. F. Boyce, G. R. Mundy, and G. D. Roodman. 1995. Interleukin-6 enhances hypercalcemia and bone resorption mediated by parathyroid hormone-related protein in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 95:28462852.[Web of Science][Medline]
Diamant, M., M. B. Hansen, K. Rieneck, M. Svenson, K. Yasukawa, and K. Bendtzen. 1994. Stimulation of the B9 hybridoma cell line by soluble interleukin-6 receptors. J. Immunol. Methods 173:229235.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gauldie, J., C. Richards, D. Harnish, P. Lansdorp, and H. Baumann. 1987. Interferon beta 2/B-cell stimulatory factor type 2 shares identity with monocyte-derived hepatocyte-stimulating factor and regulates the major acute phase protein response in liver cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:72517255.
Goldenberg, D. L. 1999. Septic arthritis. Lancet 351:197202.[Web of Science]
Green, J., S. Schotland, Z. Sella, and C. R. Kleeman. 1994. Interleukin-6 attenuates agonist-mediated calcium mobilization in murine osteoblastic cells. J. Clin. Invest. 93:23402350.[Web of Science][Medline]
Greenfield, E. M., S. M. Shaw, S. A. Gornik, and M. A. Banks. 1995. Adenyl cyclase and interleukin-6 are downstream effectors of parathyroid hormone resulting in stimulation of bone resorption. J. Clin. Invest. 96:12381244.[Web of Science][Medline]
Helle, M., L. Boeije, E. de Groot, A. de Vos, and L. Aarden. 1991. Sensitive ELISA for interleukin-6. Detection of IL-6 in biological fluids: Synovial fluids and sera. J. Immunol. Methods 138:4756.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hirano, T., K. Yasukawa, H. Harada, T. Taga, Y. Watanabe, T. Matsuda, S. Kashiwamura, K. Nakajima, K. Koyama, A. Iwamatsu, S. Tsunasawa, F. Sakiyama, H. Matsui, Y. Takahara, T. Taniguchi, and T. Kishimoto. 1986. Complementary DNA for a novel human interleukin (BSF-2) that induces B lymphocytes to produce immunoglobulin. Nature 324:7376.[Medline]
Houssiau, F. A., P. G. Coulie, D. Olive, and J. Van Snick. 1988. Synergistic activation of human T cells by interleukin 1 and interleukin 6. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:653656.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hu, G. Z., L. J. Xu, L. Yuan, M. Li, B. Q. Yuan, and Q. Deng. 2002. Pharmacokinetical of levofloxacine. Chin. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 21:130134.
Huang, J. G., X. Y. Hu, G. F. Cheng, S. Q. Zhou, and N. H. Song. 2002. The diagnosis of staphylococcus arthritis in breeding broilers. Hubei Agric. Sci. 4:7879.
Ikebuchi, K., G. G. Wong, S. C. Clark, J. N. Ihle, Y. Hirai, and M. Ogawa. 1987. Interleukin 6 enhancement of interleukin 3-dependent proliferation of multipotential hemopoietic progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:90359039.
Ishimi, Y., C. Miyaura, C. H. Jin, T. Akatsu, E. Abe, Y. Nakamura, A. Yamaguchi, S. Yoshiki, T. Matsuda, and T. Hirano. 1990. IL-6 is produced by osteoblasts and induces bone resorption. J. Immunol. 145:32973303.[Abstract]
Kishimoto, T., S. Akira, M. Narazaki, and T. Taga. 1995. Interleukin-6 family of cytokines and gp130. Blood 86:12431254.
Li, H., X. M. Li, G. F. Cheng, C. Q. Gu, and X. Y. Hu. 2004. Test of biochemical identification and drug-susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus from broilers. Pages 632637 in Sessional Symp. Assoc. Vet. Sci. Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Lu, H. M., D. Y. Chen, B. M. Qi, and Y. F. Huang. 2006. Effects of azone on the crop mucosal structure and the immune efficacy of Newcastle disease vaccine. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 35:199202. (Natl. Sci. Ed.)
Lynagh, G. R., M. Bailey, and P. Kaiser. 2000. Interleukin-6 is produced during both murine and avian Eimeria infections. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 76:89102.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nakane, A., M. Okamoto, M. Asano, M. Kohanawa, and T. Minagawa. 1995. Endogenous gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin-6 in Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 63:11651172.[Abstract]
Rath, N. C., W. E. Huff, G. R. Bayyari, and J. M. Balog. 1995. Identification of transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-6 in chicken ascites fluid. Avian Dis. 39:382389.[Web of Science][Medline]
Samad, F., G. Bergtrom, H. Eissa, and D. L. Amrani. 1993. Stimulation of chick hepatocyte fibronectin production by fibroblast-conditioned medium is due to interleukin-6. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1181:207213.[Medline]
Satoh, T., S. Nakamura, T. Taga, T. Matsuda, T. Hirano, T. Kishimoto, and Y. Kaziro. 1988. Induction of neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells by B-cell stimulatory factor 2/interleukin-6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:35463549.
Schneider, K., R. Klaas, B. Kaspers, and P. Staeheli. 2001. Chicken interleukin-6 cDNA structure and biological properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 268:42004206.[Web of Science][Medline]
Smith, R. L., G. Kajiyama, and D. J. Schurman. 1997. Staphylococcal septic arthritis: Antibiotic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment in a rabbit model. J. Orthop. Res. 15:919926.[Web of Science][Medline]
Straneva, J. E., K. W. Van Besien, G. Derigs, and R. Hoffman. 1992. Is interleukin 6 the physiological regulator of thrombopoiesis? Exp. Hematol. 20:4750.[Web of Science][Medline]
Thijs, L. G., A. B. J. Groneveld, and C. E. Hack. 1996. Multiple organ failure in septic shock. Pages 209237 in Pathology of Septic Shock. E. T. Rietschel and H. Wagner, ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Tomas, B., A. Abdelnour, and A. Tarkowski. 1992. Histopathological serological progression of experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis. Infect. Immun. 60:29762985.
Verdrengh, M., and A. Tarkowski. 1997. Role of neutrophils in experimental septicemia and septic arthritis induced by Staphylococcus aureus arthritis. Infect. Immun. 65:25172521.[Abstract]
Wei, H. J., K. Y. Cheng, C. P. Cheng, and Z. L. Nin. 1995. Experiments on portal of infection of arthritis type staphyloccosis in chicken. J. Hunan Agric. Coll. 21:8992.
Xie, H., N. C. Rath, G. R. Huff, W. E. Huff, and J. M. Balog. 2000. Effects of Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide on broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 79:3340.
Zhang, H. M., W. L. Sun, W. C. Xu, J. P. Wu, G. W. Shang, and C. Y. Shan. 2005. Antihistamine reagents inhibits the effect upon the release of IL-6 in HaCaT cell line under ultraviolet A radiation. Chin. J. Derm. Venereol. 19:658659.
Zhu, X. P., G. X. Fan, J. K. Cheng, R. P. Liu, and Y. L. Ren. 1990. Studies on the pathogenesis of staphylococcosis in chickens. Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 21:167173.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |