|
|
||||||||
METABOLISM AND NUTRITION |
Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
2 Corresponding author: ladeola{at}purdue.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: broiler chick corn phytase digestibility Escherichia coli-derived phytase growth
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plants accumulate a larger biomass than microbial expression systems and might therefore be more economically attractive as a system of phytase production. Corn constitutes the bulk of ingredients in corn-soybean meal diets and, unlike soybeans, is not subject to excessive processing temperatures. Corn-based phytase (CBP) is a genetically modified corn containing a phytase product expressed in the endosperm of the corn kernel that is identical to an Escherichia coli-derived phytase expressed in Pichia pastoris (Quantum, Syngenta Animal Nutrition, Research Triangle Park, NC). Nyannor et al. (2007) showed that the addition of CBP to a P-deficient diet improved growth performance and indices of P utilization in weanling pigs. It is therefore prudent to evaluate the efficacy of CBP compared with microbial Quantum phytase, which is sprayed onto ground wheat (WP) as a carrier, in terms of growth performance, nutrient utilization, and bone mineralization. We hypothesized that CBP would be as efficacious as the microbial Quantum phytase and that increasing the level of incorporation of CBP would improve the growth performance and bone mineralization of broiler chicks.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1
Dietary Treatments.
The ground CBP was determined to have a phytase activity of 660 phytase units (FTU) per gram of corn. One FTU is defined as the quantity of enzyme required to hydrolyze 1 µmol of inorganic P/min, at pH 5.5, from an excess of 1.5 mM sodium phytate at 37°C (International Union of Biochemistry, 1979). The 6 dietary treatments were a positive control (PC) diet formulated to contain adequate (NRC, 1994) nonphytate P of 5.0 g/kg and Ca of 10.5 g/ kg; a negative control (NC) basal diet low in Ca and P with no inorganic P supplementation (nonphytate P = 1.3 g/kg, and Ca = 5.3 g/kg); NC supplemented with 5.5 g of CBP/kg (CBP1); NC + 55 g of CBP/kg (CBP2); NC + 550 g/kg of CBP (CBP3); or NC + Quantum phytase (WP). The diets were thus formulated to contain 0, 0, 3,630, 36,300, 363,000, or 3,630 FTU/kg, respectively, and were similar in all amino acids, other minerals, vitamins, and energy, as shown in Table 1
.
|
Experiment 2
After analyzing the growth performance data of experiment 1, we observed that feed intake tended to decrease when all normal corn was substituted with CBP (CBP3) in the diet. The slightly larger particle size of the CBP corn was therefore reduced by milling through a 12.7-mm screen. Growth performance and bone mineralization of 7-d-old male broiler chicks were reevaluated from d 7 to 21 posthatch as described for experiment 1. However, unlike in experiment 1, 4 birds per cage were used instead of 6. Diet composition was as in experiment 1, except that soybean meal instead of corn starch was used in experiment 2 to replace the chromic oxide premix.
Chemical Analyses
The dried excreta, jejunal and ileal digesta samples, and diets were ground to pass through a 0.5-mm screen and mixed thoroughly before analysis. For DM determination, excreta, ileal digesta, and diets were oven-dried at 105°C until there was no change in weight. Phytase activity was determined according to the method of Engelen et al. (2001) with modifications, optimized for the E. coli phytase, involving the use of 250 mM acetate buffer, 0.1% Tween, and ammonium heptamolybdate and ammonium vanadate as yellow color reagents. Tibia bones (with ends removed) were thawed, defatted, dried, weighed, and ashed at 600°C for 16 h to determine the percentage of tibia ash. The N content of diets, excreta, and ileal digesta samples was determined by the combustion method (AOAC, 2002; method 990.03) with a combustion analyzer (Leco Model FP 2000, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI).
The diet, excreta, and ileal digesta samples for the determination of Cr, Ca, and total P contents were prepared by a nitric-perchloric acid wet ash (AOAC, 2002; method 968.08D[b]). The concentration of P was determined by using a colorimetric assay. Briefly, acid molybdate and Fiske-Subbarow reducer solution were added to the wet ash acid digest to form a phospho-molybdenum complex. The blue color intensity, measured with a spectrophotometer (SpectraCount model AS 1000, Packard Intrument Co., Downers Grove, IL) at 620 nm (AOAC, 2002; method 965.17), was proportional to P concentration. Calcium content of the wet acid ash was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAnalyst 300 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer, Perkin Elmer Instruments, Norwalk, CT), and Cr (Spectronic 21D, Milton Roy Co., Rochester, NY) was determined at a wavelength of 440 nm.
Statistical Analysis
The data collected from the trials were analyzed by using the GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Institute, 2002) appropriate for a randomized complete block design. The growth performance and bone mineralization data from the 2 experiments were combined because there was no diet x experiment interaction. Cage served as the experimental unit, and an a value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to determine significant linear and quadratic responses to CBP supplementation of the NC diet, and contrasts were used to separate the means of WP and CBP, PC and NC, and WP and NC.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Results for the growth performance and bone mineralization of broiler chicks fed CBP or WP in experiment 1 are presented in Table 3
. Broiler chicks fed the PC diet outperformed (P < 0.05) those fed the NC diets in BW gain. Birds fed the 3,630 FTU/kg of diet, CBP1, gained as much weight as those birds fed the WP diet at a similar phytase activity. In weight gain, birds responded (P < 0.01) in a quadratic manner to the supplementation of NC diets with CBP. Birds fed the NC diet had poorer (P < 0.01) weight gain than chicks fed WP at 3,630 FTU/kg of diet. When compared with the NC diet, phytase supplementation with WP led to an increase (P < 0.01) in feed intake, but birds fed WP or CBP at 3,630 FTU/kg had similar feed intake. Birds fed the NC diets supplemented with CBP had superior (quadratic, P < 0.01) feed intake compared with the NC-fed broilers. There was no difference in feed efficiency between birds fed WP or CBP1. There was no response in feed efficiency to CBP supplementation of the NC diets. There was an improvement in bone mineralization with phytase supplementation. Percentage of tibia ash was improved (P < 0.01) in birds fed WP just as well as in birds fed CBP at 3,630 FTU/kg of diet, compared with the NC-fed broiler chicks.
|
The apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients for broiler chicks is shown in Table 4
. Dry matter digestibility was unaffected by phytase supplementation. The digestibility of N was not different for birds fed WP or CBP1, but WP-fed chicks had greater (P < 0.05) apparent ileal N digestibility than birds fed the NC diet. Broiler chicks did not respond in terms of N digestibility to CBP supplementation of the NC diets. Corn-based phytase supplementation of the NC diets resulted in linear and quadratic increases (P < 0.01) in apparent ileal P digestibility. Chicks fed the WP-supplemented NC diet had nearly 100% improvement (P < 0.01) in il-eal P digestibility compared with those fed the NC diet. Birds fed the NC diet had greater (P < 0.01) apparent ileal P digestibility than birds fed the PC diet. Digestibility of P in birds fed the WP diet was greater (P < 0.01) than in birds fed CBP1. Supplementing the NC diets with 3,630 FTU/kg of WP resulted in a 51% increase (P < 0.01) in ileal Ca digestibility, but birds fed diets adequate in P and Ca had poorer (P < 0.01) apparent ileal Ca digestibility than birds fed the NC diet. Apparent ileal Ca digestibility for birds fed WP was greater (P < 0.01) than in birds fed CBP1. We observed a linear (P < 0.01) response to graded levels of CBP in the NC diets in apparent ileal Ca digestibility.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The weight gain values of broiler chicks in this study were consistent with the values obtained by Dilger et al. (2004) for broiler chicks of a similar age on a 14-d trial. Most research work on microbial phytase in broiler chicks has used phytase activity levels far below what was used in these studies. However, it has been shown (Shirley and Edwards, 2003; Augspurger and Baker, 2004) that doses of phytase activity (>5,000 FTU/kg of diet) yield improved growth performance and a nearly 100% hydrolysis of phytate P in broiler chicks. Both reports called for a review of the phytase levels used in broiler diets. The linear increase in BW gain with increasing CBP phytase activity in the NC diets, up to the level of 36,300 FTU/kg of diet, is consistent with those reports. The source of phytase (microbial or corn-based) did not influence growth performance. Zhang et al. (2000), evaluating Natuphos and genetically engineered plant phytase (canola) in broiler chicks, concluded that both phytase sources were equally efficacious. Previously, Pen et al. (1993) elegantly demonstrated, in transgenic tobacco seed using the phytase-encoding gene from Aspergillus niger, that phytase expressed in plants was comparable to those genes expressed in microbial expression systems. They reported that not only were the 2 forms of phytase equivalent in promoting growth and bone mineralization, but that they were similar in storage characteristics and enzyme stability as well.
The tibia ash weight and percentage of tibia ash appeared to be more sensitive criteria than BW gain, in contrast to the report of Ravindran et al. (1995b), who found BW and toe ash to be more sensitive measurements than tibia ash. However, it is consistent with the observations of Nelson and Walker (1964), who favored the use of tibia ash over BW as a more accurate measure of P bioavailability in broiler chicks. The tibia ash values obtained in this study are quite consistent with the values reported by Dilger et al. (2004) and Augspurger and Baker (2004).
The effect of phytase supplementation on apparent il-eal P digestibility was quite pronounced. This is consistent with the report of Shirley and Edwards (2003), who, when feeding greater levels of microbial phytase (more than 12,000 FTU/kg of diet), achieved almost complete hydrolysis of phytate P in a corn-soybean meal diet fed to broiler chicks. The results of Augspurger and Baker (2004) corroborate this earlier finding that the current level of phytase supplementation needs revising. The results of the apparent ileal digestibility in this study demonstrate that with CBP supplementation even at 36,300 FTU/kg of diet, improvements in apparent ileal P digestibility could be obtained. There is no known report on nutrient digestibility at such a level of phytase supplementation in broiler chicks. The apparent ileal P digestibility appeared to have plateaued at 36,300 FTU/kg of diet, because a further 9-fold increase in phytase activity did not yield a significant improvement in digestibility. Unlike the growth performance data, WP was more efficacious in improving apparent ileal P digestibility and retention than was CBP at the phytase activity level of 3,630 FTU/kg of diet. Differences in expression systems could account for some posttranslational modification of the phytase gene in terms of glycosylation, which might affect the activity of the enzyme (Pen et al., 1993; Rodriguez et al., 1999). Improvement in Ca digestibility with phytase supplementation of broiler diets has been reported (Ravindran et al., 1995a); however, a lack of response in apparent Ca digestibility in broiler chicks has also been reported (Dilger et al., 2004). As observed in the apparent ileal P digestibility, WP improved apparent ileal Ca digestibility of broiler chicks better than CBP1, by 20 percentage units. The effect of phytase supplementation on protein utilization continues to be unclear (Adeola and Sands, 2003). Although there are some reports of improvements in amino acid and protein digestibility with phytase supplementation (Ravindran et al., 2006), there are differing results from other researchers (Peter and Baker, 2001).
The production cost of microbial phytase was identified previously as one of the obstacles to its application in poultry diets (Ravindran et al., 1995a). The use of phytase-containing transgenic seeds in nonruminant diets could be an economically efficient way to supplement the diet with phytase. The bottleneck associated with the use of nonfeed ingredients such as tobacco seeds (Pen et al., 1993), which necessitates extraction of the phytase from the seeds before being used in feed formulations, has been overcome by using soybeans (Li et al., 1997) and canola (Zhang et al., 2000). However, corn has a unique advantage as the expression vehicle for phytase in that unlike soybeans, it does not require the high temperature associated with processing soybean meal. In addition, corn is a major feed ingredient item in poultry diets in the United States. Nyannor et al. (2007) demonstrated, using CBP in growing pigs, that corn expressing an E. coli-derived gene was indeed as effective in improving growth and P and Ca utilization as Quantum phytase.
The results showed that CBP is as efficacious as the microbial phytase in supporting growth performance and nutrient utilization in low-P and low-Ca diets. Corn-based phytase diets fed to broiler chicks resulted in improvement in bone mineralization comparable to that of phytase expressed in a microbial expression system (Quantum phytase). It can be concluded from this study that the Escherichia coli-derived phytase expressed in corn that was used in the current experiments could be incorporated in a P-deficient diet of the 7-d-old broiler chick for 14 d to improve the growth performance and bone mineralization of broiler chicks and to reduce the excretion of P.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication December 10, 2007. Accepted for publication June 3, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adeola, O., and J. S. Sands. 2003. Does supplemental dietary microbial phytase improve amino acid utilization? A perspective that it does not. J. Anim. Sci. 81 (Suppl. 2):E78–E85.
AOAC. 2002. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC.
Augspurger, N. R., and D. H. Baker. 2004. High dietary phytase levels maximize phytate-phosphorus utilization but do not affect protein utilization in chicks fed phosphorus- or amino acid-deficient diets. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1100–1107.
Augspurger, N. I., D. M. Webel, X. G. Lei, and D. H. Baker. 2003. Efficacy of an E. coli phytase expressed in yeast for releasing phytate-bound phosphorus in young chicks and pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 81:474–483.
Biehl, R. R., D. H. Baker, and H. F. DeLuca. 1998. Activity of various hydroxylated vitamin D3 analogs for improving phosphorus utilization in chicks receiving diets adequate in vitamin D3. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:408–412.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cabahug, S., V. Ravindran, P. H. Selle, and W. L. Bryden. 1999. Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorus contents. I. Effects on bird performance and toe ash. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:660–666.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Denbow, D. M., V. Ravindran, E. T. Kornegay, Z. Yi, and R.M. Hulet. 1995. Improving phosphorus availability in soybean meal for broilers by supplemental phytase. Poult. Sci. 74:1831–1842.[Web of Science][Medline]
Dilger, R. N., E. M. Onyango, J. S. Sands, and O. Adeola. 2004. Evaluation of microbial phytase in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 83:962–970.
Engelen, A. J., F. C. vander Heeft, P. H. G. Ransdorp, W.A. C. Somers, J. Schaefer, and J. C. van der Vat. 2001. Determination of phytase activity in feed by a colorimetric enzymatic method: Collaborative interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 84:629–633.[Web of Science][Medline]
Erdman, J. W. Jr. 1979. Oilseed phytates: Nutritional implications. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:736–741.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
International Union of Biochemistry. 1979. Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendation of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, NY.
Leske, K. L., and C. N. Coon. 1999. A bioassay to determine the effect of phytase on phytate phosphorus hydrolysis and total phosphorus retention of feed ingredients as determined with broilers and laying hens. Poult. Sci. 78:1151–1157.
Li, J., C. E. Hegeman, R. W. Hanlon, G. H. Lacy, D. M. Denbow, and E. A. Grabau. 1997. Secretion of active recombinant phytase from soybean cell-suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 114:1103–1111.[Abstract]
Liu, B., A. Rafig, Y. Tzeng, and A. Rob. 1998. The induction and characterization of phytase and beyond. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 22:415–424.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Lott, J. N. A., I. Ockenden, V. Raboy, and G. D. Batten. 2000. Phytic acid and phosphorus in crop seeds and fruits: A global estimate. Seed Sci. Res. 10:11–33.
Maga, J. A. 1982. Phytate: Its chemistry, occurrence, food interactions, nutritional significance, and methods of analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30:1–9.[Medline]
Nelson, T. S., and A. C. Walker. 1964. The biological evaluation of phosphorus compounds. A summary. Poult. Sci. 43:94–98.
NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
Nyannor, E. K. D., P. Williams, M. R. Bedford, and O. Adeola. 2007. Corn expressing an Escherichia coli-derived phytase gene: A proof-of-concept nutritional study in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1946–1952.
Onyango, E. M., M. R. Bedford, and O. Adeola. 2005. Efficacy of an evolved Escherichia coli phytase in diets of broiler chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 84:248–255.
Pen, J., T. C. Verwoerd, P. A. van Paridon, R. F. Beudeker, P. J. M. van den Elzen, K. Geerse, J. D. van der Klis, H. A. J. Versteegh, A. J. J. van Ooyen, and A. Hoekema. 1993. Phytase-containing transgenic seeds as a novel feed additive for improved phosphorus utilization. Nat. Biotechnol. 11:811–814.[CrossRef]
Peter, C. M., and D. H. Baker. 2001. Microbial phytase does not improve protein–amino acid utilization in soybean meal fed to young chickens. J. Nutr. 131:1792–1797.
Raboy, V. 2003. myo-Inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate. Phytochemistry 64:1033–1043.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ravindran, V., W. L. Bryden, and E. T. Kornegay. 1995a. Phytates: Occurrence, bioavailability and implications in poultry nutrition. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 6:125–143.
Ravindran, V., E. T. Kornegay, L. M. Potter, B. O. Ogunabameru, M. K. Welten, J. H. Wilson, and M. Potchanakorn. 1995b. An evaluation of various response criteria in assessing biological availability of phosphorus for broilers. Poult. Sci. 74:1820–1830.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ravindran, V., P. C. H. Morel, G. G. Partridge, M. Hruby, and J. S. Sands. 2006. Influence of an Escherichia coli-derived phytase on nutrient utilization in broiler starters fed diets containing varying concentrations of phytic acid. Poult. Sci. 85:82–89.
Rogriguez, E., J. M. Porres, Y. Han, and X. G. Lei 1999. Different sensitivity of recombinant Aspergillus niger phytase (r-PhyA) and Escherichia coli pH 2.5 acid phosphatase (r-AppA) to trypsin and pepsin in vitro. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 365:262–267.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
SAS Institute. 2002. Statistical Analysis System Proprietary Software. Release 8.1. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Shirley, R. B., and H. M. Edwards Jr. 2003. Graded Levels of phytase past industry standards improves broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 82:671–680.
Zhang, Z. B., E. T. Kornegay, J. S. Radcliffe, D. M. Denbow, H. P. Veit, and C. T. Larsen. 2000. Comparison of genetically engineered microbial and plant phytase for young broilers. Poult. Sci. 79:709–717.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. K. D. Nyannor, M. R. Bedford, and O. Adeola Corn expressing an Escherichia coli-derived phytase gene: Residual phytase activity and microstructure of digesta in broiler chicks Poult. Sci., July 1, 2009; 88(7): 1413 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |