Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2008. 87:2178-2185. doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00034
© 2008 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S. C.

ENVIRONMENT, WELL-BEING, AND BEHAVIOR

The Effects of Alfalfa-Based Molt Diets on Skeletal Integrity of White Leghorns

W. K. Kim*,1, T. M. Herfel{dagger}, C. S. Dunkley*,2, P. Y. Hester{ddagger}, T. D. Crenshaw{dagger} and S. C. Ricke*,3,4

* Department of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2472; {dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; and {ddagger} Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

4 Corresponding author: sricke{at}uark.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sixty White Leghorn hens were assigned to 1 of 6 treatments: pretrial control (PC), full fed (FF), 9-d feed withdrawal (FW), 90% alfalfa-10% layer ration (A90), 80% alfalfa-20% layer ration (A80), and 70% alfalfa/30% layer ration (A70). For the PC, hens were killed and bones collected immediately before light restriction. The FF hens were also subjected to light restriction. After hens were fasted or fed different molting treatment diets for 9 d, they were fed a maintenance diet for 14 d. At 23 d postmolt, hens were killed and bones collected. Feed intakes per hen of the FF, A90, A80, and A70 treatments during a 9-d molting period were 97, 17, 44, and 46 g, respectively. Tibia dry weight of the PC was greater than the FF group. The PC group had significantly greater tibia ash weight than the FF, FW, A90, and A80 groups. Tibia ash concentration of the PC group was significantly greater than the FF, A90, and A80 groups. Humerus dry weights of the PC group were greater than the other groups except for hens on FW. Humerus ash weight was lower for FF hens as compared with PC hens, but other molting treatments had humerus ash weights similar to PC hens. Tibia mineral content and density of the PC were significantly greater than the other treatments. The FF group exhibited significantly lower humerus mineral content and density compared with those of the PC group. The PC and A70 hens exhibited significantly greater ultimate bending moment and ultimate stress compared with the FF and A90 hens. The modulus of elasticity of the PC hens was greater than that of the FF and A90. There were no significant differences in modulus of elasticity among the PC, FW, A80, and A70 hens. In conclusion, hens at 23 d postmolt experienced deterioration in skeletal integrity. This decrease in bone quality occurred in all molted hens. However, A70 and A80 alfalfa-fed hens retained mechanical properties of bones compared with the pretrial control.

Key Words: skeletal integrity • alfalfa • bone mineral density • molting • bone strength


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Osteoporosis is a widespread problem in the laying hen industry that involves the progressive loss of structural bone (Whitehead and Fleming, 2000). Osteoporosis is one of the major causes of subsequent fractures in older laying hens (Randall and Duff, 1988). The pain associated with such intense physical injury can be severe (Knowles and Wilkins, 1998). Moreover, in end-of-lay hens raised in conventional cages, 98% of carcasses at the end of evisceration exhibit broken bones (Gregory and Wilkins, 1989). Broken bones during the evisceration causes bone fragments to be mixed with meat, lowering the quality of the product. Gregory and Wilkins (1989) also reported 29% of laying hens will experience one or more broken bones within a lifetime. Approximately 24% of laying hens from conventional cages have freshly broken bones (Gregory et al., 1990). Broken bones are both a welfare and production issue. Broken bones cause stress to the animal and also can decrease egg production (Bishop et al., 2000; Cransberg et al., 2001).

An induced molt using feed removal is a potential factor increasing structural bone loss in older laying hens. Structural bone loss in laying hens can increase fragility and susceptibility (Whitehead and Fleming, 2000). In the past, feed removal was the primary procedure used to induce a molt to stimulate a second egg-laying cycle in hens (Breeding et al., 1992; Bell, 2003; Park et al., 2004a,b). Typically, feed is completely removed for 10 to 14 d combined with a light reduction from 16 to 8 h (Brake, 1993). After a resting period of 0 to 21 d after feed removal, molted hens are fed regular layer rations to resume egg production. Several studies have indicated that induced molt using feed removal significantly decreased bone quality in laying hens (Garlich et al., 1984; Park et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2005, 2006; Mazzuco and Hester, 2005a,b). Garlich et al. (1984) reported that an induced molt using feed removal decreased femur weight and density in laying hens. Mazzuco and Hester (2005a,b) also reported that hens subjected to a fasting molt for 10 d exhibited a precipitous decrease in bone mineral density compared with nonmolted controls. Kim et al. (2006) indicated that induced molt using feed removal for 9 d significantly decreased bone dry weight, ash weight, breaking strength, mineral density, and mineral content compared with pretrial controls. After molted hens were fed maintenance diets or standard layer rations to stimulate egg production, bone qualities were slowly restored (Garlich et al., 1984; Mazzuco and Hester, 2005a). However, bone quality did not return to prefast levels, although bone quality increased when fasted hens were fed a standard layer ration (Newman and Leeson, 1999). It has been shown that a nonfasted molt using a wheat middling-based diet was less detrimental to bone mineralization than a fasted molt (Mazzuco and Hester, 2005b; Mazzuco et al., 2005). As a result of these studies and others, US egg producers who participate in the animal welfare-certified program of United Egg Producers (228 million layers) use only a non-feed withdrawal molting regime (United Egg Producers, 2006).

We developed alfalfa-based nonfasting molt diets that were comparable to postmolt performance of feed removal molting regimes (Donalson et al., 2005; Landers et al., 2005a,b) and in addition limited Salmonella Enteritidis colonization and support in vitro cecal microbial fermentation (Woodward et al., 2005; McReynolds et al., 2005, 2006; Dunkley et al., 2007). Alfalfa contains high protein with a good amino acid balance and is high in Ca with a slow rate of passage through the digestive tract (Sibbald, 1979; Sen et al., 1998; Garcia et al., 2000; Ponte et al., 2004). Recently, we reported that alfalfa-based molt diets may be beneficial in maintaining mechanical properties of bones during a 9-d molt period as compared with a fasted regime (Kim et al., 2007). In the present study, we evaluate the effects of alfalfa based nonfasting molt diets on skeletal integrity at 23 d postmolt.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Samples

Sixty White Leghorn hens, at 53 wk of age, were obtained from a nearby layer unit. The hens were placed in floor pens for 2 wk where they were taught to use nipple waterers, the type that would be available in the cages. At 55 wk of age, hens were placed in individual cages for 2 wk before initiation of treatments to be acclimatized to their new surroundings. They were given water and layer rations ad libitum, and production records were kept. One week before the initiation of the dietary treatments, the photo period in each of the rooms was changed from 16L:8D to 8L:16D. Hens were assigned randomly to 6 treatment groups: pretrial control (PC), full fed (FF), feed withdrawal (FW), 90% alfalfa meal and 10% layer ration (A90), 80% alfalfa meal and 20% layer ration (A80), and 70% alfalfa meal and 30% layer ration (A70). The negative control was the FW hens, which were not fed. The positive control consisted of the FF hens, which were given 100% layer ration. On d 0, ten hens were killed using CO2 inhalation for the PC group. Right femurs were collected for mechanical testing and histological analysis. After hens were subjected to different molting treatments for 9 d, they were fed a maintenance diet for 14 d. On d 23 postmolt, hens were killed using CO2 inhalation, and tibia, femur, and humerus bones were collected and evaluated using conventional bone assays, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), mechanical testing, and histological analysis.

DEXA

To monitor bone integrity, frozen tibia and humerus with muscle and feathers intact were thawed and scanned using DEXA (Norland Medical System, Fort Atkinson, WI). Scanning began at the proximal end of each bone and took approximately 10 min for each bone. The orientation of the respective bone was the same for each scan. The bone mineral density and bone mineral content of the right tibia and humerus were determined from the DEXA scans (Schreiweis et al., 2003; Hester et al., 2004).

Conventional Bone Assays

Bone parameters were measured according to the methods described by Zhang and Coon (1997) and Park et al. (2003). After measuring bone mineral density and content using DEXA, bones were weighed in air and then reweighed while suspended in water at room temperature. Bone volumes were calculated assuming that the specific gravity of water is 1 g/cm3 at room temperature. For dry weight, the bones were initially dried at 100°C for 24 h and weighed. For ash weight, the dried bones were ashed at 600°C for 24 h, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed. Bone ash concentrations were calculated by dividing the ash weight of each bone by its volume (Zhang and Coon, 1997).

Bone Mechanical Properties

Bending Moments. To determine maximum bending moment, 3-point bending tests were conducted on the mid diaphysis of the right femurs using a 50-kg load cell with the Instron Machine Model 5566 (Engineering Corporation, Canton, MA). The support fulcra were adjusted (34 to 45 mm) depending on bone length. The yield load and ultimate load along with the deformation at each location were determined from the load deformation curve generated during the mechanical test. Loads were applied at 5 mm.

Staining Technique. Approximately 2 mm slices were removed at the bending point and stained using modifications of a differential stain for cortical and medullary bone in laying hens (Lynch and Maxwell, 1991). Before staining, the slices were defatted with a 3:1 ethanol:acetone solution for 60 min. Each defatted slice was subjected to 2 mL of the ethanol:acetone solution and 2 mL of water. After 10 min, 2 mL of additional ethanol:acetone solution was added and for every 10 min thereafter for a total of 60 min. After 60 min, bones were rinsed 3 times in distilled water. The slices were subsequently placed in acidified permanganate (equal parts of 0.3% aqueous potassium permanganate and 3% aqueous sulfuric acid) for 7 min and then rinsed 3 times with distilled water. They were placed in 5% oxalic acid for 7 min and then rinsed 3 times with distilled water. The slices were placed in 4.5% silver nitrate for 7 min and then in distilled water for 10 min. The slices were then again rinsed 3 times in distilled water followed by placement in ammonical silver for 7 min and rinsed in distilled water 3 times. The slices were then placed in a 10% formalin solution buffered in 0.85% NaCl for 7 min and then rinsed 3 times with distilled water. Finally, they were immersed in a 10% sodium thiosulfate solution for 10 min and rinsed in distilled water 3 times. After staining, slices were shielded from exposure to light and stored at – 20°C.

Embedding in Wax. The stained bone slices were thawed and embedded in orange wax. In a Precision Scientific Shaking Water Bath 50 (Precision Scientific, Chicago, IL), Distlefink Designs Candle Magic Wax Crystals (Craft House Corporations, Toledo, OH) were melted at 67°C in polystyrene culture test tubes. Bone slices were added to the melted wax, and any bubbles in the wax were removed by tapping the test tubes. After the wax had hardened, the test tubes were broken. The wax on one side of the slice was removed by running it across a piece of metal that was warmed to 58°C. Pictures of the waxed slices were taken with the Nikon Coolpix 500 digital camera (Nikon Inc., Melville, NY) through the lens of a dissection microscope.

Calculation of Bone Stress. Wax was deleted from the picture, and the pictures were edited using PhotoImpression from Nikon and Photoshop from Adobe (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA). The pictures were analyzed for moment of inertia as well as C value (the distance from the neutral axis to the extreme outer fiber) with and without medullary bone on 48 of the bones using the program Area Properties 3.6.1 (http://www.down-load.com/Area-Properties/3000-2260_4-10004867.html?cdlPid=8959582). From data collected from Instron and area properties, bone stress was calculated as follows:


Formula

where length = the length of the bone; C = the distance from the neutral axis to the extreme outer caliber; and moment of inertia is equal to the resistance of the bone to movement (Crenshaw et al., 1981).

Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to a 1-way ANOVA as a completely randomized design using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2001). Significant differences among means were determined by using Duncan’s multiple-range test at P ≤ 0.05. Correlations of bone parameters were evaluated by Pearson correlation procedures (SAS Institute, 2001).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Feed and Ca intakes of hens fed different diets during a 9-d molting period are presented in Table 1Go. The FF hens exhibited significantly greater feed and Ca intakes compared with the A90, A80, and A70 hens (Table 1Go). Hens consuming the A80 or A70 molt diets had greater feed and Ca intakes than the hens consuming the A90 molt diet (P ≤ 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences in feed and Ca intakes between the A80 and A70 molt diet-fed hens. Feed and Ca intakes increased as the ratio of layer ration to alfalfa increased.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Effect of dietary treatments on feed and calcium intakes the first day out of egg production and body weight loss during a 9-d molt period
 
The FW, A90, A80, and A70 molt diet-fed hens ceased egg production within 5 d postmolt (Table 1Go). The FF hens produced eggs throughout the entire experiment period (data not presented). The FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens had significantly greater BW loss compared with the FF hens. The FW hens lost more BW than the A80 and A70 hens (P ≤ 0.05), but not the A90 hens. The percentage of BW loss exhibited a similar trend to the BW loss. The FF hens had significant lower percentage of BW than the FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens. The percentage of BW loss of the A70 hens was less than that of the FW hens (P ≤ 0.05; Table 1Go). These results are in agreement with Donalson et al. (2005). They indicated that as the ratio of layer ration to alfalfa increased, feed intake increased, and percentage of BW loss decreased during the 9-d molt induction period. The BW loss is likely a reflection of lowered feed intake. The lower feed intake associated with alfalfa could contribute to the low palatability of alfalfa by hens due to high levels of saponine (Matsushima, 1972). This component may suppress feed intake of molting hens, resulting in greater BW loss during a 9-d molt period in the present study.

Effects of dietary treatments on tibia and humerus parameters on d 23 postmolt using conventional bone assays are shown in Table 2Go. Tibia fresh weights of the FW and A90 hens were significantly lower than the PC hens. There were no significant differences in tibia volume among the treatments. The tibia dry weight of the FF hens was lower than the other treatments (P ≤ 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the PC, FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens. The FF, FW, A90, and A80, but not the A70, hens exhibited lower tibia ash weight compared with the PC hens. The tibia ash concentrations of the FF, A90, and A80 hens were lower than the PC hens (P ≤ 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the PC, FW, and A70 hens. For humerus parameters, the FF hens exhibited significantly lower humerus fresh weight, dry weight, and ash weight than the PC hens. The humerus fresh weights of the FW, A90, and A80 hens were lower than the PC hens (P ≤ 0.05). The A90, A80, and A70 hens exhibited significantly lower humerus dry weights compared with the PC hens. There were no significant differences in humerus ash weight among the PC, FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens. Overall, feed withdrawal and alfalfa molt diets decreased bone parameters measured by conventional methods during the 23-d postmolt. However, the hens fed the A70 alfalfa molt diet exhibited comparable bone parameters to PC hens. Because the hens fed the A70 diet had greater feed intake and Ca intake (Table 1Go), they appeared to maintain better bone quality compared with those fed an alfalfa molt diet (A90) or feed withdrawal hens.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Effect of dietary treatments on tibia and humerus parameters on d 23 postmolt using conventional bone assays and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
 
Tibial mineral content and density of the PC hens were significantly greater than the FF, FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens. Humerus mineral content and humerus density of the PC were significantly greater than the FF hens, whereas there were no significant differences among the PC, FW, A90, A80, and A70 hens (Table 2Go). These results also indicate that bone mineral content and density are decreased during a 23-d postmolt period regardless of molt dietary treatments.

Bone mineral density and content measured by DEXA are highly correlated with conventional bone assays (Table 3Go). Bone mineral density and content were positively correlated with fresh weight, ash weight, and ash concentration. Bone mineral density and content were highly correlated with each other (P < 0.0001). Tibia dry weight was positively correlated with ash weight and ash concentration (P < 0.0001). These results are in agreement with other studies (Zhang and Coon, 1997; Kim et al., 2005; Mazzuco and Hester, 2005a). Kim et al. (2005) reported that dry bone weight, ash weight, and ash concentration were highly correlated with each other. Mazzuco and Hester (2005a) indicated that a strong correlation existed among bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and bone ash weight responses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Correlations among tibia bone parameters
 
The PC and A70 hens exhibited significantly greater ultimate bending moment and ultimate stress compared with the FF and A90 hens (Table 4Go). Modulus of elasticity of the PC hens was greater than that of the FF and A90 hens. There were no significant differences in modulus of elasticity among the PC, FW, A80, and A70 hens. Moment of inertia of different bone compartments had no significant differences among dietary treatments. These results indicate that the FW, A80, and A70 hens have some beneficial effects on mechanical properties of bones during molt, whereas A90 and FF hens have poor mechanical properties of bones when compared with PC hens. Previously, we also observed that alfalfa molt diets exhibited retained mechanical properties of bones compared with the PC hens during a 9-d molt period (Kim et al., 2007). In the present study, the FF hens had poor bone parameters compared with the PC hens or the other dietary treatments. Because the FF hens had the same decreased light schedule as the other molting hens, they had much less time to access feed than the PC hens, but they continued to lay eggs throughout the molt periods, resulting in more bone resorption for the eggshell formation and decreased bone mechanical properties.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Effect of dietary treatments on femur mechanical properties on d 23 postmolt
 
Bending moment increases as moment of inertia of whole bone (Figure 1Go) and cortical bone (Figure 2Go) increases (P < 0.02), whereas no significant relationship was detected between moment of inertia of medullary bone and bending moment (Figure 3Go). These results indicate that cortical bone affects mechanical strength of bone, but medullary bone does not. Although there are conflicting conclusions on medullary bone and bone strength by different studies, our results are in agreement with other studies (Knott et al., 1995; Knott and Bailey, 1999), which indicate that medullary bone does not contribute to mechanical strength of bone.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Comparison of total bone moment of inertia with maximum bending moment of the femur.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Comparison of cortical bone moment of inertia with maximum bending moment of the femur.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Comparison of medullary bone moment of inertia with maximum bending moment of the femur.

 
In summary, the present study suggests that all molted hens exhibited decreases in overall bone quality. However, A70, A80, and FW hens retained mechanical properties of bones compared with the PC hens, whereas A90 and FF hens did not. Additional study is necessary to evaluate the effects of alfalfa-based molt diets on egg production, eggshell quality, and bone quality during the second laying cycle.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by the USDA (USDA-National Research Initiative grant number 2002-02614), Hatch grant H8311, and US Poultry & Egg Association grant number 485. Appreciation is extended to Pooja Talaty (Purdue University) for conducting DEXA scans.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Current address: Department of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Back

2 Current address: Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0478. Back

3 Current address: Center for Food Safety-IFSE and Food Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704-5690. Back

Received for publication January 18, 2008. Accepted for publication June 13, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bell, D. D. 2003. Historical and current molting practices in the U.S. table egg industry. Poult. Sci. 82:965–970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bishop, S. C., R. H. Fleming, H. A. McCormack, D. K. Flock, and C. C. Whitehead. 2000. Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:33–40.[Web of Science][Medline]

Brake, J. 1993. Recent advances in induced molting. Poult. Sci. 72:929–931.[Web of Science]

Breeding, S. W., J. Brake, J. D. Garlich, and A. L. Johnson. 1992. Molt induced by dietary zinc in a low-calcium diet. Poult. Sci. 71:168–180.[Web of Science][Medline]

Cransberg, P. H., G. B. Parkinson, S. S. Wilson, and B. H. Thorp. 2001. Sequential studies of skeletal calcium reserves and structural bone volume in a commercial layer flock. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:260–265.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Crenshaw, T. D., E. R. Peo, A. J. Lewis, and B. D. Moser. 1981. Bone strength as a trait for assessing mineralization in swine: A critical review of techniques involved. J. Anim. Sci. 53:827–835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Donalson, L. M., W. K. Kim, C. L. Woodward, P. Hererra, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2005. Utilizing different ratios of alfalfa and layer ration for molt induction and performance in commercial laying hens. Poult. Sci. 84:362–369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dunkley, K. D., C. S. Dunkley, N. L. Njongmeta, T. R. Callaway, M. E. Hume, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2007. Comparison of in vitro fermentation and molecular microbial profiles of high-fiber feed substrates incubated with chicken cecal inocula. Poult. Sci. 86:801–810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garcia, J., R. Carabano, L. Perez-Alba, and J. C. de Blas. 2000. Effect of fiber source on cecal fermentation and nitrogen recycled through cecotrophy in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 78:638–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garlich, J., J. Brake, C. R. Parkhurst, J. P. Thaxton, and G. W. Morgan. 1984. Physiological profile of caged layers during one production year, molt, and postmolt: Egg production, egg shell quality, liver, femur, and blood parameters. Poult. Sci. 63:339–343.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1989. Broken bones in domestic fowl: Handling and processing damage in end-of-lay battery hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:555–562.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gregory, N. G., L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Eleperuma, A. J. Ballantyne, and N. D. Overfield. 1990. Broken bones in domestic fowls: Effects of husbandry system and stunning method in end-of-lay hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:59–69.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hester, P. Y., M. A. Schreiweis, J. I. Orban, H. Mazzuco, M. N. Kopka, M. C. Ledur, and D. E. Moody. 2004. Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Poult. Sci. 83:215–221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim, W. K., L. M. Donalson, S. A. Bloomfield, H. A. Hogen, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2007. Molt performance and bone density of cortical, medullary, and cancellous bone in laying hens during feed restriction or alfalfa-based feed molt. Poult. Sci. 86:1821–1830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim, W. K., L. M. Donalson, P. Herrera, L. F. Kubena, D.J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2005. Comparisons of molting diets on skeletal quality and eggshell parameters in hens at the end of the second egg-laying cycle. Poult. Sci. 84:522–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim, W. K., L. M. Donalson, A. D. Mitchell, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2006. Effects of alfalfa and fructooligosaccharide on molting parameters and bone qualities using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and conventional bone assays. Poult. Sci. 85:15–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Knott, L., and A. J. Bailey. 1999. Collage biochemistry of avian bone: Comparison of bone type and skeletal site. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:371–379.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Knott, L., C. C. Whitehead, R. H. Fleming, and A. J. Bailey. 1995. Biochemical changes in the collagenous matrix of osteoporotic avian bone. Biochem. J. 310:1045–1051.[Web of Science][Medline]

Knowles, T. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1998. The problem of broken bones during the handling of laying hens–A review. Poult. Sci. 77:1798–1802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Landers, K. L., Z. R. Howard, C. L. Woodward, S. G. Birkhold, and S. C. Ricke. 2005a. Potential of alfalfa as an alternative molt induction diet for laying hens: Egg quality and consumer acceptability. Bioresour. Technol. 96:907–911.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Landers, K. L., C. L. Woodward, X. Li, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2005b. Alfalfa as a single dietary source for molt induction in laying hens. Bioresour. Technol. 96:565–570.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lynch, M., and M. H. Maxwell. 1991. Differentiation of cancellous bone and medullary bone in laying hens: A novel technique for image analysis. Biotech. Histochem. 66:303–306.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Matsushima, J. K. 1972. Feedlot Feeding. Pages 632–640 in Alfalfa Science and Technology. C. H. Hanson, ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

Mazzuco, H., and P. Y. Hester. 2005a. The effect of an induced molt and a second cycle of lay on skeletal integrity of White Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 84:771–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mazzuco, H., and P. Y. Hester. 2005b. The effect of an induced molt using a nonfasting program on bone mineralization of White Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 84:1483–1490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mazzuco, H., J. P. McMurtry, A. Y. Kuo, and P. Y. Hester. 2005. The effect of pre- and postmolt diets high in n-3 fatty acids and molt programs on skeletal integrity and insulin-like growth factor-I of White Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 84:1735–1749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McReynolds, J., L. Kubena, J. Byrd, R. Anderson, S. Ricke, and D. Nisbet. 2005. Evaluation of Salmonella Enteritidis in molting hens after administration of an experimental chlorate product (for nine days) in the drinking water and feeding an alfalfa molt diet. Poult. Sci. 84:1186–1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McReynolds, J. L., R. W. Moore, L. F. Kubena, J. A. Byrd, C. L. Woodward, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2006. Effect of various combinations of alfalfa and standard layer diet on susceptibility of laying hens to Salmonella Enteritidis during forced molt. Poult. Sci. 85:1123–1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Newman, S., and S. Leeson. 1999. The effect of feed deprivation and subsequent refeeding on the bone characteristics of aged hens. Poult. Sci. 78:1658–1663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park, S. Y., S. G. Birkhold, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2003. Effect of storage condition on bone breaking strength and bone ash in laying hens at different stages in production cycles. Poult. Sci. 82:1688–1691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park, S. Y., S. G. Birkhold, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2004a. Effects of high zinc diets using zinc propionate on molt induction, organs, and postmolt egg production and quality in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 83:24–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park, S. Y., W. K. Kim, S. G. Birkhold, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2004b. Induced molting issues and alternative dietary strategies for the egg industry in the United States. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 60:196–208.[Web of Science]

Ponte, P. I. P., I. Mendes, M. Quaresma, M. N. M. Aguiar, J. P. C. Lemos, L. M. A. Ferreira, M. A. C. Soares, C. M. Alfaia, J. A. M. Prates, and C. M. G. A. Fontes. 2004. Cholesterol levels and sensory characteristics of meat from broilers consuming moderate to high levels of alfalfa. Poult. Sci. 83:810–814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Randall, C. J., and S. R. I. Duff. 1988. Avulsion of the patellar ligament in osteopenic laying fowl. Vet. Rec. 128:397–399.

SAS Institute. 2001. SAS/STAT® User’s Guide: Statistics. Release 8.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Schreiweis, M. A., J. I. Orban, M. C. Ledur, and P. Y. Hester. 2003. The use of densitometry to detect differences in bone mineral density and content of live White Leghorns fed varying levels of dietary calcium. Poult. Sci. 82:1291–1301.

Sen, S., H. P. S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 1998. Alfalfa saponins and their implications in animal nutrition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:131–140.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sibbald, I. R. 1979. Passage of feed through the adult rooster. Poult. Sci. 58:446–459.[Web of Science][Medline]

United Egg Producers. 2006. Animal Husbandry Guidelines for US Egg Laying Flocks. http://www.uepcertified.com/ Accessed July 2007.

Whitehead, C. C., and R. H. Fleming. 2000. Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poult. Sci. 79:1033–1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Woodward, C. L., Y. M. Kwon, L. F. Kubena, J. A. Byrd, R. W. Moore, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2005. Reduction of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization and invasion by an alfalfa diet during molt in Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 84:185–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang, B., and C. N. Coon. 1997. The relationship of various tibia bone measurements in hens. Poult. Sci. 76:1698–1701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS