Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Poult Sci 2008. 87:317-322. doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00309
© 2008 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow _Erratum_
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W. A., III
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION

Apparent Metabolizable Energy of Glycerin for Broiler Chickens1,2,3

W. A. Dozier, III*,4, B. J. Kerr{dagger}, A. Corzo{ddagger}, M. T. Kidd{ddagger}, T. E. Weber{dagger} and K. Bregendahl§

* USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762; {dagger} USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Swine Odor and Manure Management Research Unit, Ames, IA 50011; {ddagger} Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762; and § Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

4 Corresponding author: bdozier{at}msa-msstate.ars.usda.gov


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Three energy balance experiments were conducted to determine AMEn of glycerin using broiler chickens of diverse ages. In experiment 1, two dietary treatments were fed from 4 to 11 d of age. Dietary treatments consisted of a control diet (no added glycerin) and a diet containing 6% glycerin (94% control diet + 6% glycerin). Four dietary treatments were provided in experiment 2 (from 17 to 24 d of age) and 3 (from 38 to 45 d of age). Diets in experiment 2 and 3 were 1) control diet (no added glycerin); 2) 3% added glycerin (97% control diet + 3% glycerin); 3) 6% added glycerin (94% control diet + 6% glycerin); and 4) 9% added glycerin (91% control diet + 9% glycerin). Diets in experiment 1 and 2 were identical, but the diet used in experiment 3 had reduced nutrient levels based on bird age. In experiments 2 and 3, broilers were fed 91, 94, 97, and 100% of ad libitum intake so that differences in AMEn consumption were only due to glycerin. A single source of glycerin was used in all experiments. Feed intake, BW, energy intake, energy excretion, nitrogen intake, nitrogen excretion, AMEn, and AMEn intake were determined in all experiments. In experiment 1, AMEn determination utilized the difference approach by subtracting AMEn of the control diet from AMEn of the test diet. In experiments 2 and 3, AMEn intake was regressed against feed intake with the slope estimating AMEn of glycerin. Regression equations were Y = 3,331x –72.59 (P ≤ 0.0001) and Y = 3,348.62x –140.18 (P ≤ 0.0001) for experiments 2 and 3, respectively. The AMEn of glycerin was determined as 3,621, 3,331, and 3,349 kcal/kg in experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average AMEn of glycerin across the 3 experiments was 3,434 kcal/kg, which is similar to its gross energy content. These results indicate that AMEn of glycerin is utilized efficiently by broiler chickens.

Key Words: broiler • metabolizable energy • glycerin


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biofuel production is experiencing exponential growth to provide an alternative fuel source to reduce dependence upon petroleum-based fuel products. In the United States, annual production capacity of biodiesel is approximately 5.26 billion L, and with another 7.15 billion L/yr of additional production through new construction or plant expansion (National Biodiesel Board, 2007). Glycerin, a coproduct from biodiesel production, represents about 9% of the starting feedstocks on a weight basis. Glycerin is known to be a valuable ingredient for producing food, soaps, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals (Thompson and He, 2006). Furthermore, glycerin may also be a valuable dietary energy source for poultry. It is a 3-carbon compound, and pure glycerin contains approximately 4,100 kcal/kg of gross energy (Brambilla and Hill, 1966).

During digestion, triglycerides are hydrolyzed by pancreatic lipase to form free fatty acids and glycerol (Brody, 1994). The resulting glycerol is water soluble and freely enters the portal blood (Sambrook, 1980). Intestinal absorption of glycerol in rats has been shown to range from 70 to 89% (Hober and Hober, 1937), with the high absorption rate of glycerol likely due to its small molecular weight and it being passively absorbed rather than forming a micelle like that noted for medium and large chain fatty acids with bile salts (Guyton, 1991). Once digested, absorbed, and transferred to liver and tissues, glycerol is converted to glucose via gluconeogenesis (Emmanuel et al., 1983) or oxidized for energy production via glycolysis and the citric acid cycle (Rosebrough et al., 1980).

Several researchers have reported that glycerin is an acceptable feed ingredient for poultry (Campbell and Hill, 1962; Lessard et al., 1993; Simon et al., 1996; Cerrate et al., 2006). Adding glycerin up to an inclusion level of 5% has shown no adverse effects on growth or carcass yield (Lessard et al., 1993; Simon et al., 1996; Cerrate et al., 2006). However, increasing dietary glycerin above 10% has been shown to adversely affect growth performance and meat yield of broiler chickens (Simon et al., 1996; Cerrate et al., 2006), although this may be due to feed flowability and associated feed consumption (Cerrate et al., 2006).

Previous research has used the ME of glycerin as 95 to 100% of its gross energy (GE) in dietary formulation (Brambilla and Hill, 1966; Lin et al., 1976; Cerrate et al., 2006). To our knowledge, AMEn of glycerin with broiler chickens has not been previously reported. The objectives of this research were to determine AMEn of glycerin using broiler chickens at various ages to 1) delineate AMEn of glycerin, and 2) determine if broilers from diverse ages utilize glycerin differently.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bird Husbandry
Three energy balance experiments were conducted. Ross x Ross 708 broilers were obtained from a commercial hatchery that had been vaccinated for Marek’s disease, Newcastle disease, and infectious bronchitis. Three days prior to experimentation, broilers were randomly distributed into grower battery cages (Alternative Design Mfg., Siloam Springs, AR). In experiment 1, 288 chicks were used from 4 to 11 d of age (12 chicks per cage; 6 males and 6 females), whereas 576 chicks from 17 to 25 d of age (12 chicks per cage; 6 males and 6 females) were used in experiment 2, and 240 male broilers from 37 to 45 d (5 birds per cage) were used in experiment 3. Each cage (66 cm x 66 cm x 76 cm) was equipped with 1 trough feeder and 1 nipple waterer. The experimental facility was a solid-sided house with temperature control. Temperature was set at 30, 23, and 19°C in experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Lighting was continuous with intensities of 10 (experiments 1 and 2) or 3 (experiment 3) lx. All procedures relating to the use of live birds were approved by the USDA-ARS Animal Care and Use Committee at the Mississippi State location.

Dietary Treatments
A single source of glycerin was added to the basal diets to create treatment diets in all experiments and contained 86.95% glycerol (Table 1Go). Basal diets were formulated to meet or exceed NRC (1994) nutrient recommendations for broilers in each experiment (Table 2Go). Because no dietary fat was added, all diets were formulated to be low in AMEn. In addition, all diets differed in nutrient composition due to the diverse age of broilers used in experimentation. Experimental diets were created by the addition of glycerin to the basal diet. In experiment 1, 2 dietary treatments were formulated, consisting of a control diet (100% basal diet) and a diet containing 6% glycerin (94% basal diet + 6% glycerin). In experiments 2 and 3, dietary treatments included the addition of glycerin at 0 (100% basal diet), 3% (97% basal diet + 3% glycerin), 6% (94% basal diet + 6% glycerin), or 9% (91% basal diet + 9% glycerin). Experiment 1 was a preliminary study that estimated AMEn by difference, where AMEn of the control diet was subtracted from the AMEn of the diet containing 6% glycerin. Birds were fed ad libitum. In experiments 2 and 3, broilers were fed 91, 94, 97, and 100% of ad libitum intake as determined from previous research at our laboratory. Feeding varying proportions of ad libitum intake allowed for each treatment group to consume the same amount of basal diet so differences in AMEn consumption were due to glycerin. Subsequently, AMEn intake was regressed against feed intake with the slope representing AMEn of glycerin (Adeola, 2001). One advantage of using regression analysis is that the slope estimate involves multiple inclusion levels instead of estimating from 1 level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Characterization of crude glycerin fed to broilers in experiments 1, 2, and 3
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diets1
 
Measurements
The following procedures were common to all experiments. Body weight was determined when broilers were allocated to battery cages and also at the end of experimentation to ensure that dietary treatments did not limit growth. A 72-h total excreta collection period was conducted to evaluate AMEn of glycerin. After a 3-d acclimation period, feed refusal and feed allocation were weighed daily throughout the 72-h collection period. Total amount of excreta voided at the end of the collection was weighed (wet basis). Multiple subsamples were collected from the total amount of excreta and homogenized, and then a 250-g representative sample was placed in a plastic bag for analysis. Representative samples of feed and excreta were frozen and subsequently dried at 55°C for 48 h. Dried samples were then ground through a Thomas-Wiley mill (Arthur H. Thomas Company, Philadelphia, PA) equipped with a 1-mm screen to ensure a homogeneous mixture. Gross energy content of feed and excreta were determined on a 2-g sample using an isoperbol oxygen bomb calorimeter (model 1281, Parr Instruments, Moline, IL), and analysis was performed in duplicate. Nitrogen content of feed and excreta was determined on a 0.2-g sample with a Combustion N analyzer (Truspec N Determinator, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI) in duplicate using a previously established method (AOAC, 1996). Feed consumption and excreta weights during the 72-h collection period were used to calculate energy and nitrogen intake and excretion. Apparent MEn was calculated using the following equation: AMEn = [GEI – GEE] – [8.73 x (NI – NE)] ÷ FI, where GEI = GE intake, GEE = GE output in the excreta, NI = nitrogen intake from the diet, NE = nitrogen output from excreta, FI = feed intake, and 8.73 = nitrogen correction factor reported from previous research (Titus, 1956).

Statistics
Data were statistically evaluated by the GLM and MIXED procedures (SAS, 2004) involving a randomized complete block design. Cage location was the blocking factor. Three analyses were used: 1) ANOVA with treatment means separated by the least significance comparison; 2) regression analysis to evaluate linear and quadratic effects of dietary glycerin addition; and 3) AMEnintake was regressed against feed intake to determine AMEn of glycerin. Model effects included block, diet, and block x diet (error). Statistical significance was considered at P ≤ 0.05. Observations were removed when the response criteria exceeded 2 SD from the mean.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment 1
Apparent MEn of glycerin was determined as 3,621 kcal/kg with 7- to 10-d-old broiler chicks (Table 3Go). Broilers fed the diet containing 6% glycerin had higher (P ≤ 0.05) AMEn and AMEn intake than the control-fed birds. Feed intake, energy excretion, and BW were not affected by the dietary treatments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Dietary treatments fed to broilers from 7 to 10 d of age in experiment 11
 
Experiment 2
Apparent MEn of glycerin was estimated as 3,331 kcal/kg using 21- to 24-d-old broilers (Figure 1Go). Regressing AMEn intake against feed intake resulted in an equation of Y = 3,331x – 72.59 (P ≤ 0.0001; r2 = 0.80). Gradient increments of glycerin (P ≤ 0.001) increased feed intake and gross energy intake, but final BW, energy excretion, and AMEn were not affected (Table 4Go). Feed intake and gross energy intake increased (P ≤ 0.05) with each increment of glycerin.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Regression of AMEn intake vs. feed intake from 21 to 24 d of age in experiment 2. Dietary glycerin addition of 0% = 0.197 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 3% = 0.203 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 6% = 0.210 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 9% = 0.216 kg of feed intake. Y = 3,331x – 72.59 (P ≤ 0.0001; SE of the slope = 266; r2 = 0.80).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. Energy balance of broilers fed graded levels of glycerin from 21 to 24 d of age in experiment 21
 
Experiment 3
Glycerin was estimated to contain 3,349 kcal AMEn/kg with 42- to 45-d-old broilers (Figure 2Go). Apparent MEnintake was regressed against feed intake to estimate AMEn of glycerin as Y = 3,349x – 140.18 (P ≤ 0.0001; r2 = 0.84). Progressive addition of glycerin increased (P ≤ 0.03) feed intake, gross energy intake, and AMEn (Table 5Go). Feed intake and gross energy intake increased (P ≤ 0.05) with each incremental level of glycerin. Broilers fed 9% glycerin had higher (P ≤ 0.05) AMEn than control fedbroilers, but AMEn was similar to broilers fed either 3 or 6% glycerin.


Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Regression of AMEn intake vs. feed intake from 42 to 45 d of age in experiment 3. Dietary glycerin addition of 0% = 0.417 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 3% = 0.431 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 6% = 0.449 kg of feed intake; dietary glycerin addition of 9% = 0.460 kg of feed intake. Y = 3,349x – 140.18 (P ≤ 0.0001; SE of the slope = 222; r2 = 0.84).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5. Energy balance of broilers fed graded levels of glycerin from 42 to 45 d of age in experiment 31
 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Glycerin obtained from biodiesel production contained 3,596 kcal/kg of GE (Cerrate et al., 2006). In the current research, glycerin was analyzed to contain 3,625 kcal/kg of GE, 86.95% glycerol, and 9.63% moisture. The lower GE content of the glycerin source used in experimentation compared with pure glycerol (4,100 kcal/kg of GE; Brambilla and Hill, 1966) is probably related to the lower glycerol content. The mean AMEn content of glycerin across the 3 experiments was estimated as 3,434 kcal/kg, which was 95% of GE content. A numerical difference of 290 kcal/kg (3,621 vs. 3,331 kcal/kg) existed between experiments 1 and 2. This should not be statistically significant because the SE was 221 and 266 for experiments 1 and 2. In addition, the AMEn values between experiments 1 and 2 cannot be directly related to an age effect because experiment 1 used only 2 treatments, whereas experiment 2 evaluated 4 treatments. Conversely, only an 18 kcal of AME/kg numerical difference (3,331 vs. 3,349 kcal/kg) was observed between experiments 2 and 3.

In experiment 2, broilers fed 3% glycerin had more variability in AMEn intake (2.6 vs. 1.6% coefficient of variation) than broilers consuming diets formulated to contain 6 or 9% glycerin. The higher variability associated with 3% glycerin was probably due to the low amount test product added compared with the 2 higher treatment levels. Moreover, MEn determination can be a highly variable measurement (Dozier et al., 2001, 2003; Batal and Dale, 2006). In addition, variability associated with feed intake and excreta measurements in balance experiments can mask differences due to treatments with low inclusion levels of a test ingredient. The basis of using 3, 6, and 9% glycerin was to create treatments that would be relevant to commercial practice. It would be expected that the broiler industry would use a maximum inclusion level of 5 to 6% glycerin; hence, 3 and 6% would be within the maximum range. The 9% glycerin level was chosen to create adequate spread so an AMEn value could be determined with regression analysis. Furthermore, Cerrate et al. (2006) demonstrated that feeding glycerin at the 10% level had a negative effect on growth and carcass yield.

For comparative purposes, AMEn of glycerin is approximately 40% of poultry oil (Cullen et al., 1962; Lessire and Leclercq, 1982) and 36% of corn oil (NRC, 1994). However, AMEn of glycerin is only 10 to 12% higher than corn and grain sorghum, respectively (NRC, 1994). Hence, the energy value of glycerin is a replacement of carbohydrates and only a partial replacement of fats and oils.

In conclusion, AMEn of glycerin was efficiently utilized with an AMEn of 3,434 kcal/kg, which was very similar to its GE. Based on this research, AMEn can be assigned 92 to 95% of its GE. Future research should determine if AMEn and GE are closely related with glycerin sources derived from different feedstocks.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank M. Carden, D. Chamblee, and M. Robinson for their contributions in managing the birds and data collection and J. Cook for laboratory analysis.


   FOOTNOTES
 
1 Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA, Iowa State University, or Mississippi State University. Back

2 The term glycerol is discussed when it is produced from metabolism, whereas glycerin is used when it is produced from fats and oils as a by-product of manufacturing of soaps, fatty acids, and biofuel. Back

3 This is a corrected PDF showing the correct spelling of the last author's name (K. Bregendahl). Back

Received for publication July 23, 2007. Accepted for publication October 22, 2007.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Adeola, O. 2001. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. Pages 903–916 in Swine Nutrition, 2nd ed. A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern. CRC Press, New York, NY.

AOCS. 1996. Official Method of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. 16th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Int., Gaithersburg, MD.

AOCS. 2000. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 5th ed. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., Champaign, IL.

ASTM. 2006. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials Standards International, Vol. 05.04, Petroleum Products and Lubericants (IV): D6557—Latest, ASTM Int., West Conschohocken, PA.

Batal, A. B., and N. M. Dale. 2006. True metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility of distillers dried grains with solubles. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:89–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brambilla, S., and F. W. Hill. 1966. Comparison of neutral fat and free fatty acids in high lipid-low carbohydrates diets for the growing chicken. J. Nutr. 88:84–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brody, T. 1994. Nutritional Biochemistry. Acad. Press Inc., San Diego, CA.

Campbell, A. J., and F. W. Hill. 1962. The effects of protein source on the growth promoting action of soybean oil, and the effect of glycerine in a low fat diet. Poult. Sci. 41:881–882.[Web of Science]

Cerrate, S., F. Yan, Z. Wang, C. Coto, P. Sacakli, and P. W. Waldroup. 2006. Evaluation of glycerine from biodiesel production as a feed ingredient for broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 11:1001–1007.

Cullen, M. P., O. G. Rasmussen, and O. H. M. Wilder. 1962. Metabolizable energy value and utilization of different types and grades of fat by the chick. Poult. Sci. 41:360–367.[Web of Science]

Dozier, W. A., III, E. T. Moran Jr., and M. T. Kidd. 2001. Male and female responses to low and adequate dietary threonine on nitrogen and energy balance. Poult. Sci. 80:926–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dozier, W. A., III, E. T. Moran Jr., and M. T. Kidd. 2003. Broiler chick utilization of threonine from fermentation by-product broth. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 12:299–305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Emmanuel, B., R. Berzins, and A. R. Robblee. 1983. Rates of entry of alanine and glycerol and their contribution to glucose synthesis in fasted chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 24:565–571.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Guyton, A. C. 1991. Textbook of Medical Physiology. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA.

Hober, R., and J. Hober. 1937. Experiments on the absorption of organic solutes in the small intestine of rats. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 10:401–422.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lessard, P., M. R. Lefrancois, and J. F. Bernier. 1993. Dietary addition of cellular metabolic intermediates and carcass fat deposition in broilers. Poult. Sci. 72:535–545.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lessire, M., and B. Leclercq. 1982. Metabolisable energy value of fats in chicks and adult cockerels. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 7:365–374.[CrossRef]

Lin, M. H., D. R. Romsos, and G. A. Leveille. 1976. Effect glycerol on enzyme activities and on fatty acid synthesis in the rat and chicken. J. Nutr. 106:1668–1677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

National Biodiesel Board. 2007. Official Site of the National Biodiesel Board. http://www.biodiesel.org/ Accessed May 2007.

National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Rosebrough, R. W., E. Geis, P. James, H. Ota, and J. Whitehead. 1980. Effects of dietary energy substitutions on reproductive performance, feed efficiency, and lipogenic enzyme activity on large white turkey hens. Poult. Sci. 59:1485–1492.[Web of Science]

Sambrook, I. E. 1980. Digestion and absorption of carbohydrate and lipid in the stomach and the small intestine of the pig. Pages 78–93 in Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs. A. G. Low and I. G. Partridge, ed. Natl. Inst. Res. Dairying, Reading, UK.

SAS Institute. 2004. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

Simon, A., H. Bergner, and M. Schwabe. 1996. Glycerol-feed ingredient for broiler chickens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 49:103–112.[Web of Science]

Thompson, J. C., and B. B. He. 2006. Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl. Eng. Agric. 22:261–265.[Web of Science]

Titus, H. W. 1956. Energy values of feedstuffs for poultry. Pages 10–14 in Proc. Semiannual Meet. Nutr. Counc. Am. Feed Manufacturers Assoc., St. Louis, MO.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
S. Swiatkiewicz and J. Koreleski
Effect of crude glycerin level in the diet of laying hens on egg performance and nutrient utilization
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2009; 88(3): 615 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
P. J. Lammers, B. J. Kerr, T. E. Weber, K. Bregendahl, S. M. Lonergan, K. J. Prusa, D. U. Ahn, W. C. Stoffregen, W. A. Dozier III, and M. S. Honeyman
Growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and tissue histology of growing pigs fed crude glycerin-supplemented diets
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 2962 - 2970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
P. J. Lammers, B. J. Kerr, T. E. Weber, W. A. Dozier III, M. T. Kidd, K. Bregendahl, and M. S. Honeyman
Digestible and metabolizable energy of crude glycerol for growing pigs
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 602 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
C. G. Scanes
The Effect of Bioenergy
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 213 - 214.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow _Erratum_
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W. A., III
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS