|
|
||||||||
METABOLISM AND NUTRITION |





* USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory, 3793 N 3600 E, Kimberly, ID 83341-5076;
Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7608;
Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061; and
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research Unit, 3271 Ligon Street, Raleigh, NC 27607
2 Corresponding author: April.Leytem{at}ars.usda.gov
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: broiler soluble phosphorus excreta phytate environment
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diet modification has been one of the fundamental methods for altering both total P and WSP in manure. There has been interest in manipulating diets to decrease P concentration in poultry manure (Maguire et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2004). For monogastric animals that cannot fully digest phytate P, dietary strategies have included genetic development of mutant grains that contain substantially less phytate P than the wild-type equivalents (Raboy et al., 2000; Dorsch et al., 2003). Feeding such low phytate (LP) grains has been shown to improve P utilization in poultry (Li et al., 2001a,b) and reduce P excretion (Jang et al., 2003).
Manure P composition has been found to influence the concentration of manure WSP. An increased proportion of phytate P in poultry litters and manures can impact P solubility; the proportion of WSP decreased when phytate P concentrations of manures and litters increased (Leytem and Maguire, 2006). Therefore, dietary factors that influence the amount of phytate P excreted could potentially alter the WSP fraction of the resultant manures.
Supplemental minerals, such as Ca and other divalent and trivalent cations, can form stable complexes with phytate and result in reduced hydrolysis of phytate P. Increased dietary Ca has been shown to reduce phytate P hydrolysis in poultry, although manure phytate P concentrations were not measured (Ballam et al., 1985; Scheideler and Sell, 1987; van der Klis and Versteegh, 1996; Tamim et al., 2004). In addition to inhibiting phytate P hydrolysis, addition of Ca to diets caused precipitation of insoluble CaP complexes in poultry manure, which made manure P less soluble (Toor et al., 2005).
Leytem et al. (2007) recently reported that increasing the dietary Ca to available P ratio (Ca:AvP) in broiler diets decreased litter WSP due to decreased phytate P hydrolysis and increasing CaP precipitation in the gut. However, the extent that dietary Ca can influence WSP in manure generated from broiler diets containing variable levels of phytate P has not yet been examined. To address this, we investigated the effects of dietary phytate P and Ca levels on manure total P, WSP, and phytate P excretion from broilers fed diets containing soybean meal (SBM) with varying phytate P levels. In addition, we examined the impact of the dietary adaptation period on properties of these excreta.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To obtain practical broiler diets that differed in phytate P concentration, SBM produced from 3 different cultivars of soybeans that differed in their natural phytate P content were utilized (Table 1
). The high phytate (HP) Prolina SBM (0.51% phytate P; Burton et al., 1999) and the LP SBM (0.15% phytate P; Wilcox et al., 2000) were generated from soybeans selected for improved protein or reduced phytate P content, respectively. A commercial SBM (0.45% phytate P) with similar protein and amino acid content and which was intermediate in its phytate P concentration was selected as a control. Further, to increase the range of phytate P in the final diets, degermed de-hulled (DGDH) corn was used in diet formulation (
0.09% phytate P).
|
|
Sample Analysis
A portion of the excreta subsample (prior to refrigeration) was dried for 24 h in an oven at 100°C to determine dry weight. Fresh excreta samples were immediately analyzed for WSP by shaking the equivalent of 1 g of dry excreta with 100 mL of deionized water for 1 h, filtering through a 0.45-µm membrane, and analyzing total WSP by inductively-coupled plasma atomic-emission spectrometry (Optima 2000, Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, MA). The remaining excreta samples were frozen, lyophilized, and ground (<2 mm) for analysis. Analysis of the excreta and ileal samples for total elements and phytate were as follows: (i) total elements (Ca and P) were determined by microwave-assisted digestion of a 0.5-g dried sample with 8 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 2 mL of 30% H2O2 (vol/vol) with all elements quantified using inductively-coupled plasma optical-emission spectrometry (4300DV, Perkin-Elmer) detection; and (ii) phytate P was determined by acid extraction followed by HPLC analysis (Agilent HPLC 1100 series, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE; Kwanyuen and Burton, 2005).
Statistical Analyses
All data were analyzed using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2004). There were 4 replicate cages per treatment arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 blocks. Two blocks were located in each of 2 rooms. A cage of birds served as the experimental unit. Data were analyzed using a factorial model that included SBM, dietary Ca level, and the interaction of SBM x Ca level as fixed effects with block as a random effect. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to assess the significance of the ability of linear or quadratic models to describe the response in the dependent variable to increasing Ca level. Where appropriate, means separation was carried out using Tukeys HSD with an alpha level of 0.05. Statements of statistical significance were based upon P < 0.05 unless otherwise stated.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From collection I, the total excreta P ranged from 6.11 to 14.87 g of P/kg, while the WSP ranged from 3.66 to 13.29 g of P/kg (Table 3
). The ratios of excreta WSP:total P ranged from 0.60 to 0.90. The average total P, WSP, and WSP:total P of the excreta generated from the various diets followed the trend HP Prolina > commercial > LP SBM. Excreta phytate P ranged from 1.18 to 7.27 g of P/kg, with the lowest average phytate P concentration observed in the LP SBM treatment with no significant differences between the remaining diets. The ratios of excreta phytate P:total P ranged from 0.18 to 0.59, with the average ratio following the trend commercial > HP Prolina > LP SBM. The ANOVA indicated that SBM had a significant effect on total P, WSP, phytate P, and phytate P:total P, whereas Ca significantly affected all variables measured. The interaction of SBM and Ca was only significant for the WSP and the WSP:total P variables and is discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The inclusion of LP SBM in diets in lieu of commercial SBM also resulted in a 46 and 48% reduction in WSP in excreta from collections I and II, respectively. Penn et al. (2004) reported a WSP decrease of 48% in litter from turkeys fed a LP corn vs. a normal corn diet, whereas Smith et al. (2005) reported a WSP decrease of 36% in broiler litters from diets containing LP vs. normal corn.
In the present study, there was a decrease of 73 and 75% in phytate P excreted between the HP Prolina and LP SBM diets for collection I and II, respectively (Tables 3
and 4
). Toor et al. (2005) reported a decrease of 47% in phytate P excretion from broilers fed diets containing normal corn vs. LP corn. The large decreases in excreta phytate P found in the present study were likely due to the fact that the main source of phytate P in the diet was from the SBM, as DGDH corn was used in the diets, whereas Toor et al. (2005) fed normal corn based diets. van der Klis and Versteegh (1996) reported that the phytate P degradation in corn was only 16% whereas that of SBM was 61%. Therefore, the phytate P in SBM may be more susceptible to hydrolysis than that found in corn, which may account for the much higher percentage of phytate P degradation in the present study.
The influence of increasing dietary Ca on both excreta WSP and the WSP:total P ratio was highly significant for collections I and II (Tables 3
and 4
). As the dietary Ca increased within each diet, the WSP decreased from 31 to 35% for collection I and from 42 to 65% for collection II. However, the significant Ca x SBM source interaction in the present study suggested that the relationship between dietary Ca and either excreta WSP or the WSP:total P ratio was dependent upon the dietary phytate P concentration. At higher dietary phytate P concentrations (HP Prolina or commercial SBM), the slope of the response in both excreta WSP and WSP:total P to increasing dietary Ca (higher Ca:NPP ratio) was greater than when diets contained reduced phytate P concentrations from inclusion of LP SBM (Table 5
).
The dietary adaptation period significantly influenced the response in excreta WSP and WSP:total P to increasing dietary Ca. The slope of the response of excreta WSP and WSP:total P to increasing Ca was greater for the HP Prolina and the commercial SBM treatments following a 3-d dietary adaptation period, whereas there was no difference in the LP SBM treatment (Table 5
). This suggested that when phytate P was present in broiler diets an adaptation period was necessary to determine true effects of diet on P excretion.
The effects of increased dietary Ca on excreta WSP were attributed to a combination of several factors. The calculated optimal Ca:AvP ratio that maximized absorption and retention of P in broilers was reported to be approximately 2.2 (van der Klis and Versteegh, 1996), whereas the Ca:NPP ratio in the present study ranged from 1.34 to 3.63. At a high dietary Ca, phytate P hydrolysis, and therefore P absorption, was reduced due to Ca-phytate precipitates in the gut and excretion of phytate P (Figure 3
). At a low dietary Ca, P appeared to be absorbed but was later excreted in the urine, presumably due to insufficient Ca for P retention to occur (Plumstead et al., 2008). Therefore, it would be important to balance the dietary Ca:NPP ratio to maximize P absorption by the bird, thereby decreasing total P excretion.
Plumstead et al. (2008) reported that the optimum ratio of Ca:NPP that resulted in the highest P retention and lowest P excretion was 2.53:1, 2.40:1, and 2.34:1 for the HP Prolina, commercial SBM, and LP SBM treatments, respectively. These ratios also resulted in lower excreta WSP concentrations and were near the point where the responses to Ca addition that changed excreta WSP concentrations were insignificant (Figure 1b
). Further addition of Ca beyond these ratios would not be beneficial in terms of reducing total P or WSP excretion and would only result in further potential interference in phytate P hydrolysis and P absorption by the birds.
Leytem et al. (2007) found that an increased ratio of dietary Ca:AvP significantly decreased WSP excretion in broilers fed corn-soy-based diets with and without phytase addition. Leytem et al. (2007) postulated that this was due to the combined effect of Ca interference with phytate P hydrolysis in the birds, as well as a decrease in the proportion of inorganic P that was soluble due to CaP precipitation in the gut. It has been demonstrated in several studies that increasing dietary Ca reduced phytate P hydrolysis in poultry (Ballam et al., 1985; Scheideler and Sell, 1987; van der Klis and Versteegh, 1996; Tamim et al., 2004). Toor et al. (2005) also reported that as dietary Ca increased there was an increase of insoluble CaP precipitates in the resulting excreta.
In the present study, there was a strong negative correlation between the proportion of phytate P in the excreta and excreta WSP, particularly when birds were allowed a dietary adaptation period, as with collection II (r = –0.7 to –0.9, P < 0.002). As the proportion of phytate P in the excreta increased, the excreta WSP decreased due to the decreased solubility of phytate P relative to inorganic P. Sequential extraction of broiler litter has shown that P compounds extracted in water were predominantly inorganic P and that the majority of phytate P was only extracted in stronger extractions such as HCl or NaOH (Turner and Leytem, 2004). Therefore, litters or excreta that have a greater proportion of phytate P will have lower WSP concentrations. Examination of available literature revealed this same trend in broiler litter (Maguire et al., 2004; Toor et al., 2005: Leytem et al., 2007) and excreta from laying hens (Leytem et al., 2006).
The WSP content of both broiler litters and excreta can be influenced by microbial activity in the ceca. In the present study, the amount of phytate P decreased by 28 to 41% from the ileal digesta to the excreta (Figure 4
). As phytate P concentrations decreased, a resulting increase in WSP could be expected. Kerr et al. (1999) reported that the levels of phytate P were very low in the ceca of broiler chicks and that the disappearance of phytate P from the ileum to the ceca indicated that microbial activity in the ceca had a large impact on phytate P hydrolysis.
In the present study, dietary Ca had a significant influence on both excreta WSP and WSP:total P across several DGDH corn-SBM-based diets. The excreta WSP was influenced by the dietary phytate P levels and dietary adaptation period. Earlier research that examined the influence of dietary modification on WSP excretion did not take into account the effects of dietary Ca and the resulting Ca:NPP ratio on WSP excretion, which, in part, may explain some of the variation in previously reported results. Many poultry producing regions have begun using a measurement of litter/excreta WSP to assess the potential impacts of land application on P losses. A better understanding of what may be controlling WSP levels in poultry litters and excreta must be developed to improve their management with respect to environmental protection.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication June 5, 2007. Accepted for publication October 28, 2007.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ballam, G. C., T. S. Nelson, and L. K. Kirby. 1985. Effect of different dietary levels of calcium and phosphorus. Nutr. Rep. Int. 32:909–913.[ISI]
Burton, J. W., T. E. Carter, and R. F. Wilson. 1999. Registration of Prolina soybean. Crop Sci. 39:294–295.
Dorsch, J. A., A. Cook, K. A. Young, J. M. Anderson, A. T. Bauman, C. J. Volkmann, P. P. N. Murthy, and V. Raboy. 2003. Seed phosphorus and inositol phosphate phenotype of barley low phytic acid genotypes. Phytochemistry 62:691–706.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jang, D. A., J. G. Fadel, K. C. Klasing, A. J. Mireles, Jr., R. A. Ernst, K. A. Young, A. Cook, and V. Raboy. 2003. Evaluation of low-phytate corn and barley on broiler chick performance. Poult. Sci. 82:1914–1924.
Kerr, M. J., H. L. Classen, and R. W. Newkirk. 1999. The effects of gastrointestinal tract micro-flora and dietary phytase on inositol hexaphosphate hydrolysis in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):11. (Abstr.)
Kleinman, P. J. A., A. N. Sharpley, B. G. Moyer, and G. F. Elwinger. 2002a. Effect of mineral and manure phosphorus sources on runoff phosphorus. J. Environ. Qual. 31:2026–2033.
Kleinman, P. J. A., A. N. Sharpley, A. M. Wolf, D. B. Beegle, and P. A. Moore. 2002b. Measuring water-extractable phosphorus in manure as an indicator of phosphorus in runoff. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:2009–2015.
Kwanyuen, P., and J. W. Burton. 2005. A simple and rapid procedure for phytate determination in soybean and soybean products. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 82:81–85.[CrossRef][ISI]
Leytem, A. B., and R. O. Maguire. 2006. Environmental implications of inositol phosphates in animal manures. Pages 126–145 in Inositol Phosphates: Linking Agriculture and the Environment. B. L. Turner, A. E. Richardson, and E. J. Mullaney, ed. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
Leytem, A. B., P. W. Plumstead, R. O. Maguire, P. Kwanyuen, and J. Brake. 2007. What aspect of dietary modification in broilers controls litter water soluble P: Dietary P, phytase, or calcium? J. Environ. Qual. 36:453–463.
Leytem, A. B., D. R. Smith, T. J. Applegate, and P. A. Thacker. 2006. The influence of manure phytic acid on phosphorus solubility in calcareous soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1629–1638.
Li, Y. C., D. R. Ledoux, T. L. Veum, V. Raboy, K. Zyla, and A. Wikiera. 2001a. Bioavailability of phosphorus from low phytic acid barley. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10:86–89.
Li, Y. C., D. R. Ledoux, T. L. Veum, V. Raboy, K. Zyla, and A. Wikiera. 2001b. Low phytic acid barley improves performance, bone mineralization, and phosphorus retention in turkey poults. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10:178–185.
Maguire, R. O., J. T. Sims, W. W. Saylor, B. L. Turner, R. Angel, and T. J. Applegate. 2004. Influence of phytase addition to poultry diets on phosphorus forms and solubility in litters and amended soils. J. Environ. Qual. 33:2306–2316.
Moeser, A. J., I. B. Kim, E. van Heugten, and T. A. T. G. Van Kempen. 2002. The nutritional vlaue of degermed, dehulled corn for pigs and its impact on the gastrointestinal tract and nutrient excretion. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2629–2638.
Penn, C. J., G. L. Mullins, L. W. Zelazny, J. G. Warren, and J. M. McGrath. 2004. Surface runoff losses of phosphorus from Virginia soils amended with turkey manure using phytase and high available phosphorus corn diets. J. Environ. Qual. 33:1431–1439.
Plumstead, P. W., A. B. Leytem, J. W. Spears, R. O. Maguire, P. Kwanyuen, J. W. Burton, and J. Brake. 2008. Interaction of calcium and phytate in broiler diets. 1. Effects on apparent prececal digestibility and retention of phosphorus. Poult. Sci. 87:449–458.
Raboy, V., P. F. Gerbasi, K. A. Young, S. D. Stoneberg, S. G. Pickett, A. T. Bauman, P. P. N. Murthy, W. F. Sheridan, and D. S. Ertl. 2000. Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1-1 and low phytic acid 2-1. Plant Physiol. 124:355–368.
SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT Users Guide. Release 9.1. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Scheideler, S. E., and J. L. Sell. 1987. Utilization of phytate phosphorus in laying hens as influenced by dietary phosphorus and calcium. Nutr. Rep. Int. 35:1073–1081.[ISI]
Sharpley, A., and B. Moyer. 2000. Phosphorus forms in manure and compost and their release during simulated rainfall. J. Environ. Qual. 29:1462–1469.
Smith, D. R., P. A. Moore, and D. M. Miles. 2005. Soil extractable phosphorus changes with time after application of fertilizer. I. Litter from poultry fed modified diets. Soil Sci. 170:530–542.[CrossRef]
Smith, D. R., P. A. Moore, D. M. Miles, B. E. Haggard, and T. C. Daniel. 2004. Decreasing phosphorus runoff losses from land-applied poultry litter with dietary modifications and alum addition. J. Environ. Qual. 33:2210–2216.
Tamim, N. M., R. Angel, and M. Christman. 2004. Influence of dietary calcium and phytase on phytate phosphorus hydrolyses in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 83:1358–1367.
Toor, G. S., J. D. Peak, and J. T. Sims. 2005. Phosphorus speciation in broiler litter and turkey manure produced from modified diets. J. Environ. Qual. 34:687–697.
Turner, B. L., and A. B. Leytem. 2004. Phosphorus compounds in sequential extracts of animal manures: Chemical speciation and a novel fractionation procedure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:6101–6108.[Medline]
Vadas, P. A., J. J. Meisinger, L. J. Sikora, J. P. McMurtry, and A. E. Sefton. 2004. Effect of poultry diet on phosphorus in runoff from soils amended with poultry manure and compost. J. Environ. Qual. 33:1845–1854.
van der Klis, J. D., and H. A. J. Versteegh. 1996. Phosphorus nutrition of poultry. Pages 71–83 in Recent Developments in Poultry Nutrition. P. C. Garnsworthy, J. Wiseman, and W. Haresign, ed. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
Wilcox, J. R., G. S. Premachandra, K. A. Young, and V. Raboy. 2000. Isolation of high seed inorganic P, low-phytate soybean mutants. Crop Sci. 40:1601–1605.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |