Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2008. 87:744-758. doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00412
© 2008 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION

Ideal Ratios of Isoleucine, Methionine, Methionine Plus Cystine, Threonine, Tryptophan, and Valine Relative to Lysine for White Leghorn-Type Laying Hens of Twenty-Eight to Thirty-Four Weeks of Age

K. Bregendahl*,1, S. A. Roberts*, B. Kerr{dagger} and D. Hoehler{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; {dagger} USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA 50011; and {ddagger} Degussa Corporation, Kennesaw, GA 30144

1 Corresponding author: kristjan{at}iastate.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Seven separate experiments were conducted with Hy-Line W-36 hens to determine the ideal ratio of Arg, Ile, Met, Met+Cys, Thr, Trp, and Val relative to Lys for maximal egg mass. The experiments were conducted simultaneously and were each designed as a randomized complete block design with 60 experimental units (each consisting of 1 cage with 2 hens) and 5 dietary treatments. The 35 assay diets were made from a common basal diet (2,987 kcal/kg of ME; 12.3% CP; 4.06% Ca, 0.47% nonphytate P), formulated using corn, soybean meal, and meat and bone meal. The true digestible amino acid contents in the basal diet were determined using the precision-fed assay with adult cecectomized roosters. Crystalline L-Arg (free base), L-Ile, L-Lys·HCl, DL-Met, L-Thr, L-Trp, and L-Val (considered 100% true digestible) were added to the basal diet at the expense of cornstarch to make the respective assayed amino acid first limiting and to yield 5 graded inclusions of the assayed amino acid. Hens were fed the assay diets from 26 to 34 wk of age, with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Egg production was recorded daily and egg weight was determined weekly on eggs collected over 48 h; egg mass was calculated as egg production x egg weight. The requirement for each amino acid was determined using the broken-line regression method. Consumption of Arg did not affect egg mass, thus a requirement could not be determined. The true digestible amino acid requirements used to calculate the ideal amino acid ratio for maximum egg mass were 426 mg/d of Ile, 538 mg/d of Lys, 253 mg/d of Met, 506 mg/d of Met+Cys, 414 mg/d of Thr, 120 mg/d of Trp, and 501 mg/d of Val. The ideal amino acid ratio for maximum egg mass was Ile 79%, Met 47%, Met+Cys 94%, Thr 77%, Trp 22%, and Val 93% on a true digestible basis relative to Lys. The ideal Met and Met+Cys ratios were verified in an ensuing identical experiment with 52- to 58-wk-old hens.

Key Words: egg mass • ideal amino acid profile • laying hen


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Amino acid (AA) requirements for laying hens are published by the NRC (1994). However, the experiments upon which these requirements are based are dated and do not account for the genetic progress of laying hens that has occurred over the last 15 yr. Amino acid requirements have been reported since the publication of the NRC (1994) (e.g., Schutte et al., 1994; Waldroup and Hellwig, 1995; Ishibashi et al., 1998; Schutte and Smink, 1998; Coon and Zhang, 1999; Russell and Harms, 1999; Harms and Russell, 2000a,b, 2001; Faria et al., 2002). However, these experiments have been conducted for a single AA at a time and were performed under different experimental conditions with different basal diets, genetic lines, feed consumption rates, dietary energy contents, feedstuffs, ambient temperature, cage space, and ages of laying hens, all of which influence the AA requirements (Leeson and Summers, 2001; Baker et al., 2002; D’Mello, 2003). Because multiple factors affect AA requirements, those determined under experimental conditions may not be applicable under field conditions and estimations of AA requirements should instead be based on the ideal AA profile (Baker and Han, 1994; Baker et al., 2002). The ideal AA profile employs the concept that, whereas absolute AA requirements change due to genetic or environmental factors, the ratios among them are only slightly affected. Thus, once the ideal AA profile has been determined, the requirement for a single AA (i.e., Lys) can be determined experimentally for a given field situation and the requirements for all other AA calculated from the ideal ratios. Such an approach has been adopted by the swine industry (NRC, 1998) and is finding use in the broiler industry as well (Emmert and Baker, 1997; Mack et al., 1999; Baker et al., 2002; Baker, 2003; Dari et al., 2005).

Unlike the NRC for swine (1998), neither the NRC for poultry (1994) nor the Dutch Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB, 1996) use the ideal AA profile to determine the AA requirements for laying hens, but report empirically determined AA requirements. These AA requirements can be used to calculate ideal AA profiles for laying hens; however, these profiles were estimated from data compiled from a variety of experiments and, thus, were influenced by genetics and environmental factors as mentioned previously. Coon and Zhang (1999) conducted 5 separate experiments to determine the AA requirements of laying hens and reported the ideal AA profile from averages of the 5 experiments. Although better than the ideal AA profile calculated from NRC (1994) or CVB (1996) recommendations, these experiments were still performed under different experimental conditions with different basal diets, ages, and genetic lines of hens. To ensure a valid measurement of the ideal AA profile, the same basal diet, the same genetic line, and the same assay period should be used in all assays of AA requirements (Baker, 2003). Hence, the objective of experiment (Exp.) 1 was to investigate responses of laying hens, 28 to 34 wk of age, to graded dietary inclusions of the essential AA Arg, Ile, Lys, Met, Thr, Trp, and Val, to determine the ideal AA ratios of the assayed AA relative to Lys. In Exp. 2, the objective was to confirm the Lys, Met, and TSAA requirements (and, therefore, the ideal Met:Lys and TSAA:Lys ratios) determined in Exp. 1.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Exp. 1, the responses to Arg, Ile, Lys, Met, TSAA, Thr, Trp, and Val were investigated at the same time using hens of the same age and genetic line, fed the same basal diet (mixed in 2 large batches to minimize variation in nutrient contents among assay diets), and housed in the same barn. In effect, Exp. 1 consisted of 7 individual dose-response assays (i.e., 1 for each AA assayed; Met and TSAA were analyzed in the same assay) conducted simultaneously in the same barn. Each of these 7 assays was a randomized complete block design with 12 blocks and 5 graded levels of the AA assayed. Experiment 2 was conducted 4 mo after Exp. 1 with the same hens to confirm the observed Lys, Met, and TSAA requirements from Exp. 1 (i.e., 2 assays, each a randomized complete block design with 12 blocks with 5 graded levels of either Lys or Met). All procedures relating to the use of live animals were approved by the Iowa State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Animals and Housing
A total of 1,008 white single-comb Leghorn-type hens (Hy-Line W-36, Hy-Line International, Des Moines, IA), 18 wk of age, were placed in a windowless fan-ventilated room. Hens were housed 2 per cage, corresponding to 619 cm2 per hen, in wire-bottomed cages (Chore-Time, Milford, IN), each equipped with a plastic self-feeder and a nipple drinker. Before Exp. 1, all hens were given free access to corn and soybean meal diets following recommendations listed in the W-36 Commercial Management Guide (Hy-Line International). The photoperiod was increased incrementally to 16L:8D at 26 wk of age in accordance with the W-36 Commercial Management Guide. A corn-soybean meal based diet, exceeding the NRC (1994) nutrient recommendations, was fed in the period between Exp. 1 and 2.

Experimental Diets
Before formulation of the assay diets, all protein-supplying ingredients were analyzed for contents of individual AA by ion-exchange chromatography (Llames and Fontaine, 1994). An industry-type control diet (Table 1Go) was formulated using corn, soybean meal, and meat and bone meal, a calculated MEn content similar to that of the AA-deficient basal diet, and formulated to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations by the NRC (1994). In addition, a basal diet was formulated to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations by the NRC (1994), except for the 7 assayed AA, using feed ingredients typically used in commercial diets (i.e., corn, soybean meal, and meat and bone meal). In Exp. 1, the basal diet was mixed in 2 separate 2,722-kg batches in a horizontal mixer at a commercial feed mill and bagged in 22.6-kg bags according to batch number. In Exp. 2, a basal diet was mixed in a vertical mixer in 3 separate 500-kg batches at the Iowa State University Poultry Science Research Center. Representative samples of the basal-diet batches were pooled within experiment and analyzed for AA content by ion-exchange chromatography (Llames and Fontaine, 1994) and for true AA digestibility (Table 2Go) by the cecectomized rooster assay at the Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA (Lumpkins and Batal, 2005). The crystalline AA added to the basal diet were assumed to be 100% true digestible (Izquierdo et al., 1988; Chung and Baker, 1992).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the control and basal diets (as-is basis)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. True digestibility (%) of amino acids in the corn-soybean meal based basal diets1
 
The 35 assay diets in Exp. 1 were formulated with equal parts of each of the 2 basal-diet batches plus a mixture of cornstarch, K2CO3 (to maintain a similar dietary electrolyte balance among all diets), and crystalline AA to create 5 equally spaced graded inclusions of each of the 7 assayed AA, such that diet 3 provided the assayed AA at the estimated requirement (Table 3Go). Hence, K2CO3 and crystalline AA partially replaced cornstarch in the basal diet. To avoid antagonisms and imbalances among AA and to ensure that the assayed AA was first-limiting in the particular assay diet, the basal diet in Exp. 1 was fortified with all AA under investigation—except the one assayed—to contain, on a true digestible basis, 0.81% Arg, 0.64% Ile, 0.87% Lys, 0.63% Met, 0.78% Met+Cys, 0.53% Thr, 0.17% Trp, and 0.74% Val in assay diet 1; 0.87% Arg, 0.78% Ile, 1.05% Lys, 0.85% Met, 1.01% Met+Cys, 0.60% Thr, 0.21% Trp, and 0.88% Val in assay diets 2 and 3; and 0.93% Arg, 0.92% Ile, 1.24% Lys, 1.07% Met, 1.22% Met+Cys, 0.67% Thr, 0.25% Trp, and 1.02% Val in assay diets 4 and 5. In other words, crystalline AA, other than the one assayed, were included in diet 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to supply the true digestible AA concentration found in diet 3, 4, 4, 5, and 5, respectively (see Table 3Go). In Exp. 2, only the responses to Lys and Met were determined; thus, there were 10 assay diets formulated with equal parts of each of the 3 basal-diet batches as described for Exp. 1 (Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Addition of crystalline amino acids (AA) in experiment 1, replacing cornstarch in the basal diet1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Addition of crystalline amino acids (AA) in experiment 2, replacing cornstarch in the basal diet1
 
In both experiments, the individual assay diets were mixed by first premixing the crystalline AA, K2CO3, and cornstarch with a small amount of basal diet in a Hobart mixer; the premix and the remainder of the basal diet (equal amounts from the respective batches) were then mixed in a 340-L horizontal ribbon mixer and fed in mash form. Representative samples of all assay diets were analyzed for individual AA by ion-exchange chromatography; the analyses agreed well with the calculated values shown in Tables 3Go and 4Go (data not shown) and only calculated values are tabulated.

Data Collection
Hens were offered free access to the experimental diets from 26 to 34 wk of age (Exp. 1) or from 50 to 58 wk of age (Exp. 2), with the first 2 wk of each experiment considered a depletion period. Thus, only data from the last 6 wk of the experiments were used in the statistical analyses. Egg production was recorded daily and feed consumption (determined as feed disappearance) was measured weekly throughout the 8-wk-long experiments. Consumption of the assay AA (mg/d) was calculated from the mean daily feed consumption (g/d) over the last 6 wk of each experiment and the dietary true digestible AA content (%). This latter content was calculated from the analyzed total AA content of the basal diet multiplied by the analyzed digestibility coefficient plus the inclusion of crystalline AA. Once a week, eggs collected over a 48-h period were weighed and the egg mass calculated by multiplying the week’s egg-production rate by the egg weight. Feed utilization was calculated as grams of egg mass divided by grams of feed consumed. Mortalities were recorded throughout the study with egg production and feed consumption rates adjusted accordingly.

Eggs collected over a 24-h period during wk 4 of Exp. 1 (i.e., hens at 30 wk of age) were saved for measurement of specific gravity using the flotation technique. Briefly, saline solutions were prepared with feed-grade NaCl and tap water to make densities from 1.065 to 1.095 g/cm3 in increments of 0.002 g/cm3. Eggs were placed sequentially in saline solutions, beginning with the lowest density, until the eggs floated for at least 5 s. The density at which each individual egg floated was recorded as its specific gravity. All specific gravity measurements were carried out in a temperature-controlled room set at 18°C. Eggs collected over a 24-h period during wk 5 of Exp. 1 (i.e., hens at 31 wk of age) were saved for measurement of egg contents. Eggs were weighed, broken, and separated into yolk, shell, and albumen fractions. Wet weights were recorded separately for all 3 components from each egg. The corresponding dry weights were recorded after drying in a forced-air drying oven at 70°C for 24 h. The percentage of egg solids was calculated as the sum of dried weights of yolk and albumen divided by the wet weight of the whole egg. Eggs collected over a 24-h period during wk 6 of Exp. 1 (i.e., hens at 32 wk of age) were weighed and used for determination of Haugh units. The albumen height of each egg was measured using an electronic tripod albumen-height gauge (Technical Services and Supplies, York, UK) with the Haugh units subsequently calculated from the records of egg weight (g) and albumen height (mm) as Haugh unit = 100 x Log(albumen height – 1.7 – egg weight0.37 + 7.57). The albumen height was measured in a temperature-controlled room set at 13°C. Hens were weighed at the beginning and end of Exp. 1 and BW change over the 8-wk-long experiment calculated.

Statistical Analyses
In each of the 7 dose-response assays, the requirement for the assayed AA was determined in a randomized complete block design with 6 dietary treatments (i.e., 5 levels of the assayed AA and 1 control diet) and 12 blocks (Morris, 1999). Thus, each block consisted of 6 cages, to which the 5 assay diets and the 1 control diet were randomly distributed. The cage location within the barn served as the blocking criterion and the experimental unit was 1 cage containing 2 hens. The requirements for digestible AA were calculated with the single-slope broken-line regression model (Robbins, 1986) using the nonlinear modeling option in JMP (version 6.0.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) with the consumption of the assayed AA (mg/d) as the independent variable (i.e., only data from the 5 cages receiving the amino acid assay diets were used). Block was not included in the broken-line regression model. The R2 values were calculated as 1 – (sum of squared errors/total sum of squares), where the sum of squared errors were derived from the broken-line regression model. Because the nonlinear modeling option in JMP only reports the sum of squared errors, the total sum of squares were calculated after fitting an overall mean to the data using the Fit-Y-by-X option in JMP. Feed consumption data were analyzed by ANOVA with block and dietary treatment as the independent variables; treatment effects were separated using linear, quadratic, and cubic orthogonal polynomial contrasts (Morris, 1999). The maximal response and associated SE (n = 60) from each of the 7 assays, determined using the broken-line model, was compared with the corresponding response from the control-fed hens (n = 12) using a 2-tailed t-test taking the unequal replications into account (Snedecor, 1946). If the broken-line regression model did not converge, ANOVA was performed with block and diet as the independent variables and, if the main effect of diet was not significant, the overall mean was compared with that of the control diet using a 2-tailed t-test. Probability values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant in all comparisons.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Exp. 1 (Hens 28 to 34 Wk of Age)
The hens were generally in good health during the experiment; 3 of the 1,008 hens (0.3%) died of reasons considered unrelated to the dietary treatments. The responses to consumption of Arg, Ile, Lys, Met, TSAA, Thr, Trp, and Val are shown in Figures 1Go to 8GoGoGoGoGoGoGo, respectively. Hens fed the 5 Arg assay diets consumed between 574 and 843 mg/d of true digestible Arg, yet there were no responses to consumption of Arg. Table 5Go summarizes the requirements for all the responses as determined using the broken-line regression model. Hens fed the graded levels of AA generally responded by increasing the feed consumption in a linear or curvilinear manner (Table 6Go). Production parameters of hens fed the AA-supplemented basal diet were inferior (P < 0.05) to those observed from hens fed the industry-type control diet, even when the AA diets supplied the assayed AA above its requirement (Table 7Go). There was no difference in feed consumption of control-fed hens among the 7 AA assays and an overall mean was calculated (84.2 ± 0.5 g/d of feed; mean ± SEM, n = 84).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Responses to consumption of true digestible Arg in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age). A broken-line regression could not be fitted (P > 0.05) to any of the responses shown. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data (n = 60) collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Responses to consumption of true digestible Ile in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Responses to consumption of true digestible Lys in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Responses to consumption of true digestible Met in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age and associated broken-line regression). The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Responses to consumption of true digestible TSAA in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. Graded levels of TSAA were created by addition of Met (not Met+Cys) to the basal diet. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Responses to consumption of true digestible Thr in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Responses to consumption of true digestible Trp in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens. The broken-line regression did not converge for egg weight data (P > 0.05).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Responses to consumption of true digestible Val in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Requirements for true digestible amino acids determined using the broken-line regression in experiment 1 (28 to 34 wk of age)1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Feed consumption of hens fed the amino acid-supplemented basal diet in Exp. 1 (28 to 34 wk of age)1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7. Comparison of responses of hens fed amino acid-adequate assay diets with the control-fed hens in Exp. 1 (28 to 34 wk of age)1
 
Exp. 2 (Hens 52 to 58 Wk of Age)
The hens were generally in good health in the period between Exp. 1 and 2 and during Exp. 2; there was no mortality. The responses to consumption of Lys, Met, and TSAA are shown in Figures 9Go to 11GoGo, respectively. Table 8Go summarizes the requirements for all the responses as determined using the broken-line regression model. As observed in Exp. 1, hens in Exp. 2 responded to the AA diets by varying feed consumption in a linear or curvilinear matter (Table 9Go). Production parameters of hens fed the AA-supplemented basal diet were inferior (P < 0.05) to those observed from hens fed the industry type control diet even when the AA diets supplied the assayed AA above its requirement (Table 10Go). Across the 2 AA assays,


Figure 9
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 9. Responses to consumption of true digestible Lys in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 10. Responses to consumption of true digestible Met in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 11. Responses to consumption of true digestible TSAA in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age) and associated broken-line regression. Graded levels of TSAA were created by addition of Met (not Met+Cys) to the basal diet. The experimental diets were fed for 8 wk with the first 2 wk considered a depletion period. Each dot ({circ}) represents data collected over 6 wk from 1 cage containing 2 hens.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 8. Requirements for true digestible amino acids determined using the broken-line regression in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age)1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 9. Feed consumption of hens (g x hen–1 x d–1) fed the amino acid-supplemented basal diet in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age)1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 10. Comparison of egg-production responses of hens fed amino acid-adequate assay diets with the control-fed hens in experiment 2 (52 to 58 wk of age)1
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The intent with the experimental design was to have 2 of the 5 assay diets supply the assayed AA below the estimated requirement; 1 diet supply the assayed AA at the estimated requirement, and 2 diets supply the assayed AA above the estimated requirement. However, the requirements for Lys and Met were overestimated in Exp. 1, such that only 1 assay diet supplied the assayed AA below the observed requirement. In other words, only 1 of the 5 assay diets was deficient in the assayed AA, lowering the confidence in the calculated AA requirement needed to calculate the ideal AA profile. The Lys and Met requirements were therefore reevaluated in Exp. 2 with the same hens using the same methodology as in Exp. 1, albeit with lower dietary contents of the assayed AA. Consequently, the breakpoints for Lys, Met, and TSAA were better defined in Exp. 2. Despite the differences in the age of the hens between the 2 experiments, the requirements for true digestible Lys, Met, and TSAA for maximal egg mass were similar. Accordingly, the ideal Met:Lys ratios (47 and 52% in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively) and TSAA:Lys ratios (94 and 96% in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively) corresponded well between the 2 experiments, indicating that the ratios for Met and TSAA determined in Exp. 1 were acceptable. Although Baker et al. (1996) recommended that requirements for Met and Cys should be considered separately to obtain a TSAA requirement for chickens, graded levels of TSAA were created by addition of Met, not Met+Cys, in the present study. This decision was made because feed-grade crystalline Cys is not available, and increasing the dietary TSAA content in commercial laying hen diets would be done by addition of Met. Despite the additions of Met only, the observed Met:Cys ratio (calculated from the observed true digestible Met and TSAA requirements of 253 and 506 mg/ d, respectively) was 50%, similar to the Met:Cys ratio reported as being optimal for growing broiler chickens and pigs (NRC, 1994; Baker et al., 1996; NRC, 1998; Lewis, 2003).

AA Requirements
The AA requirements used to calculate the ideal AA profile were determined with the broken-line regression model. This method is considered the best for obtaining the ideal ratios among AA, whereas curvilinear models such as exponential or quadratic curve fitting are better suited to establish the AA requirements for optimal performance (Mack et al., 1999; Baker et al., 2002; Robbins et al., 2006). Typically, the broken-line regression method results in lower AA requirements than when a nonlinear curve fitting is applied to the same data set (Fisher et al., 1973). However, the broken-line regression model has the advantages of a clearly defined breakpoint (i.e., the requirement) at a dietary AA consumption that marginally limits performance, both necessary to determine the ideal AA profile (Mack et al., 1999). Although the absolute AA requirements (mg/d) are reported herein, they are only valid for the particular hens in the particular experimental settings in the present study and should not necessarily be used in commercial settings, in part because they were determined using the broken-line method and not a curvilinear model (Mack et al., 1999; Baker et al., 2002), and in part because egg production of control-fed hens was superior to that of hens fed the AA assay diets.

Among the AA requirements, Lys is especially important, because it is used as the basis for setting the requirements for all other AA in the ideal AA profile (Baker et al., 2002). In Exp. 1, the true digestible Lys requirement, determined using the broken-line regression model, for maximal egg mass and feed utilization was 538 and 693 mg/d, respectively, similar to the requirements (540 and 720 mg/d apparent digestible Lys, respectively) reported by Schutte and Smink (1998) in 24-to 36-wk-old white Leghorn-type hens (Lohmann LSL) using an exponential model and similar to the 700 mg/ d of digestible Lys recommended by the CVB (1996) for optimal feed conversion. The NRC (1994) recommends a total Lys consumption of 690 mg/d to maximize egg yield (egg mass), corresponding to 593 mg/d of true digestible Lys when applying a mean true Lys digestibility of 86% in corn and soybean meal (NRC, 1994). Coon and Zhang (1999) reported digestible Lys requirements of 705 and 636 mg/d for 33- to 49-wk-old and 35- to 47-wk-old laying hens, respectively, to maximize egg mass of white Leghorn-type hens (Hy-Line W-36). In general, the Lys requirement determined in the present study corresponded well with those reported in literature.

Consumption of Arg did not elicit any responses in Exp. 1, indicating that the basal diet supplied sufficient amounts of Arg to meet the requirement of the hens for the responses measured or that Arg was not the first-limiting AA in the assay diets. Coon and Zhang (1999) demonstrated a digestible Arg requirement of 968 and 791 mg/d for 33- to 49-wk-old and 35- to 47-wk-old laying hens, respectively, whereas the NRC (1994) suggests a requirement for total Arg of 700 mg/d based on a model by Hurwitz and Bornstein (1973). The latter value corresponds to 637 mg/d of true digestible Arg when applying a mean true AA digestibility of 91% in corn and soybean meal (NRC, 1994). Jais et al. (1995) suggested an ideal Arg:Lys ratio of 82% for laying hens, corresponding to a true digestible Arg requirement of 441 mg/d for the hens in Exp. 1 (calculated as 82% of the observed Lys requirement of 538 mg/d). In Exp. 1 of the present study, the basal diet provided 0.69% true digestible Arg, resulting in a mean true digestible Arg consumption of 668 mg/d by hens fed the Arg-1 diet, which was lower than that recommended by Coon and Zhang (1999), but greater than that recommended by the NRC (1994) and Jais et al. (1995). If the NRC (1994) requirement of 637 mg/d of true digestible Arg is accepted, then not only was the Arg requirement met by the Arg-1 diet, but Phe became more limiting than Arg in the Arg-1 diet when compared with the NRC (1994) Phe requirement. However, Phe was not limiting in the Arg assay diets if the Arg and Phe requirements suggested by Jais et al. (1995) or Coon and Zhang (1999) are accepted. Yet another potential cause for the lack of response to Arg is a Lys-Arg antagonism, in which high dietary levels of Lys decrease the Arg utilization (Jones, 1964; Austic and Scott, 1975) and, as a result, reduce feed utilization (Mendes et al., 1997; Brake et al., 1998; Kidd and Kerr, 1998) and egg production. However, all the diets were designed with incrementally increasing contents of the nonassayed crystalline AA to avoid AA antagonisms and imbalances. Hence, the Lys content was similar in the Arg-2 and Arg-3 diets (and in the Arg-4 and Arg-5 diets), and, because the Arg content increased in all Arg assay diets, the Arg:Lys ratio (calculated from analyzed values; data not shown) therefore increased from 74 to 78% in the Arg-2 and Arg-3 diets, respectively (and from 71 to 75% in the Arg-4 and Arg-5 diets, respectively). Despite the increases in Arg:Lys ratios in the 2 pairs of Arg diets, feed utilization or egg production did not differ, indicating that a Lys-Arg antagonism did not occur in the present experiment.

The observed requirements for true digestible Met and TSAA to maximize egg mass (253 and 506 mg/d, respectively) were similar to those recommended by the NRC (1994), when taking digestibility into account. However, results of dose-response assays by Schutte et al. (1994), Waldroup and Hellwig (1995), and Coon and Zhang (1999) indicate that the Met and TSAA requirements for laying hens are well above the NRC (1994) levels.

The requirement for true digestible Thr to maximize egg mass observed in Exp. 1 of the present study (414 mg/d) agreed well with the 453 and 462 mg/d of total Thr reported by Ishibashi et al. (1998) and Faria et al. (2002) for white Leghorn-type laying hens and with the 430 mg/d of digestible Thr reported by Coon and Zhang in their Exp. 3 with 35- to 47-wk-old Hy-Line W-36 hens. However, in their Exp. 2, Coon and Zhang (1999) found the digestible Thr requirement to be 560 mg/d in 33- to 49-wk-old Hyline-W-36 hens, considerably greater than in the present study.

The observed requirement for true digestible Trp (120 mg/d) in the present study was similar to the 122 mg/ d of digestible Trp reported by Coon and Zhang (1999) for 33- to 49-wk-old laying hens and the 149 mg/d of total Trp reported by Harms and Russell (2000b) for 30-to 36-wk-old hens. However, the NRC (1994) recommends 160 mg/d of total Trp, greater than that observed in the present study.

The Ile requirements reported by the NRC (1994) (650 mg/d of total Ile), Harms and Russell (2000a) (601 mg/ d of total Ile), and Coon and Zhang (1999) (555 to 603 mg/d of digestible Ile, depending on age) are greater than that observed in the present study (426 mg/d of true digestible Ile). Yet, the Ile requirement from the present study was comparable to the 469 mg/d of total Ile reported by Shivazad et al. (2002) for 37- to 43-wk-old laying hens when applying a mean true Ile digestibility of 91% in corn and soybean meal (NRC, 1994).

Reported Val requirements for white Leghorn-type laying hens are greater than those observed in the present study (501 mg/d of true digestible Val). The NRC (1994) recommends 700 mg/d of total Val, whereas Coon and Zhang (1999) reported that laying hens needed between 646 and 731 mg/d of digestible Val. Harms and Russell (2001) reported a total Val requirement of 619 mg/d for 41- to 47-wk-old Hy-Line W-36 hens.

Egg Production
The observed mean egg production, egg weight, and egg mass of control-fed hens were comparable to those listed in the 2006–2008 W-36 Commercial Management Guide (i.e., 93.6%, 57.8 g, and 54.1 g/d, respectively for 28- to 34-wk-old hens; and 83%, 62.5 g, and 51.9 g/d, respectively for 52- to 58-wk-old hens). However, the observed egg production parameters from hens fed the AA assay diets were generally inferior to those observed for the control-fed hens, even when the AA requirements were met. Although such observations were discussed by Baker et al. (2002) for broiler chickens, other studies of AA requirements for laying hens mentioned previously have not included a positive control diet enabling direct comparisons. The difference in performance between hens fed the control diet and that of hens consuming adequate AA from the assay diets in the present study cannot readily be explained by a difference in feed or (calculated) ME consumption because the consumption of feed and ME was similar between the 2 groups of hens. A careful comparison of the analyzed dietary AA contents with that of the requirements revealed that the assayed AA were first limiting in their respective assay diets (except perhaps Arg, as discussed previously).

The AA-supplemented basal diet was similar in concept to low-CP diets, in which soybean meal is partially replaced by a mixture of corn and crystalline AA, resulting in a relatively low CP content. The N contributed by true digestible essential AA supplied approximately 44% of the total N in the assay diets when the AA requirements were met (data not shown), indicating an essential:nonessential AA ratio of approximately 44%. In broiler chickens and pigs, the optimal essential:nonessential AA ratio is approximately 50% (Deschepper and Groote, 1995; Heger et al., 1998), suggesting that the assay diets supplied sufficiently nonspecific N, but that energy and Gly may have had to be expended excreting the "excess" nonessential AA and giving a possible explanation for the relatively low production of hens fed the assay diets. Dean et al. (2006) demonstrated that low-CP diets for broilers were deficient in Gly+Ser, even when the NRC-recommended dietary levels were met. The NRC (1994) does not list a minimum recommended dietary content of Gly+Ser for laying hens, but recommends between 0.47 and 0.70% total Gly+Ser for immature Leghorn-type chickens depending on their age. However, the basal diet supplied 1.30% total Gly+Ser in Exp. 1, and consumption of these AA were likely not limiting egg production.

The analyzed content of Phe in the basal diet (0.47%) was similar to that recommended by the NRC (1994). However, because the feed consumption was lower in the present study than that estimated by the NRC (1994), the calculated consumption of true digestible Phe was less than that recommended by the NRC (1994). Nevertheless, Phe was not first-limiting when compared with the assayed AA (except perhaps for Arg as discussed previously). Hence, the difference in performance between hens fed the control and assay diets cannot readily be explained by an AA or nonspecific-N deficiency.

Ideal AA Profile
In contrast to the present study, previous estimates of the ideal AA profile for laying hens were based on experiments with different ages and genetic lines of hens, conducted at different times in different environments. Baker (2003) argued that the same basal diet, the same genetic line, and the same assay period should be used in all assays of AA requirements to ensure a valid measurement of the ideal AA profile. In addition, the ideal AA profile should preferably be defined separately for maintenance and production (NRC, 1998), because the relative AA needs partitioned among these are likely to change as the hen matures. However, in this study, the AA profile for maintenance, BW growth, and egg production were combined into one profile for 28- to 34-wk-old hens (Table 11Go). The ideal AA profile determined in this study indicated that hens need less true digestible Met, Ile, and Val and more true digestible Thr in relation to Lys than that suggested by Coon and Zhang (1999) and that calculated from requirements published by the NRC (1994). However, the ideal Ile:Lys ratio observed in the present study corresponded well with that calculated from AA recommendations by the CVB (1996). The determined ideal AA profile agrees well with the profile calculated from AA recommendations suggested by Leeson and Summers (2005) for 32- to 45-wk-old hens and is similar to that reported by Jais et al. (1995) with the exception of Trp and Val. The ideal Met:Lys and TSAA:Lys ratios in the present study were higher than those reported by the NRC (1994) and the TSAA:Lys ratio of 75% reported by Liu et al. (2005), but agree well with the ratios suggested by the CVB (1996) and by Leeson and Summers (2005) for 32- to 45-wk-old hens. If the lowest Arg consumption observed in Exp. 1 (574 mg/d) is accepted as meeting or exceeding the requirement of the hen for Arg, the ideal Arg:Lys ratio was no greater than 107%, similar to that calculated from the Arg and Lys recommendations by NRC (1994) and CVB (1996), and less than the 130% recommended by Coon and Zhang (1999) (Table 11Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 11. Ideal amino acid profiles1 for laying hens determined in the present study (28 to 34 wk of age) and calculated from reported amino acid requirements
 


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Funding for the study was provided in part by Evonik Degussa Corporation, Kennesaw, GA, and by the Iowa Egg Council, Urbandale, IA. In-kind contributions of feed ingredients, pullets, and services were provided by ADM, Des Moines, IA; Degussa Corporation, Kennesaw, GA; DSM Nutrition, Ames, IA; Feed Energy Company, Des Moines, IA; ILC Resources, Alden, IA; Kent Feeds, Altoona, IA; Darling International, Des Moines, IA; and Sparboe Farms, Litchfield, MN. The assistance provided by personnel in the Bregendahl laboratory and by Jeff Tjelta and Bill Larson at the Iowa State University Poultry Science Research Center is greatly appreciated.

Received for publication October 4, 2007. Accepted for publication December 21, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Austic, R. E., and R. L. Scott. 1975. Involvement of food intake in the lysine-arginine antagonism in chicks. J. Nutr. 105:1122–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baker, D. H. 2003. Ideal amino acid patterns for broiler chicks. Pages 223–235 in Amino Acids in Animal Nutrition. J.F.P. D’Mello, ed. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

Baker, D. H., A. B. Batal, T. M. Parr, N. R. Augspurger, and C. M. Parsons. 2002. Ideal ratio (relative to lysine) of tryptophan, threonine, isoleucine, and valine for chicks during the second and third weeks posthatch. Poult. Sci. 81:485–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baker, D. H., S. R. Fernandez, D. M. Webel, and C. M. Parsons. 1996. Sulfur amino acid requirement and cystine replacement value of broiler chicks during the period three to six weeks posthatching. Poult. Sci. 75:737–742.[Web of Science][Medline]

Baker, D. H., and Y. Han. 1994. Ideal amino acid profile for chicks during the first three weeks posthatching. Poult. Sci. 73:1441–1447.[Web of Science][Medline]

Brake, J., D. Balnave, and J. J. Dibner. 1998. Optimum dietary arginine:lysine ratio for broiler chickens is altered during heat stress in association with changes in intestinal uptake and dietary sodium chloride. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:639–647.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB). 1996. Aminozurenbehoefte van leghennen en vleeskuikens [Amino acid requirements for laying hens and broiler chickens]. Documentation Report nr. 18 (in Dutch), Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad, the Netherlands.

Chung, T. K., and D. H. Baker. 1992. Apparent and true amino acid digestibility of a crystalline amino acid mixture and of casein: Comparison of values obtained with ileal-cannulated pigs and cecectomized cockerels. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3781–3790.[Abstract]

Coon, C., and B. Zhang. 1999. Ideal amino acid profile for layers examined. Feedstuffs 71(14):13–15, 31.

Dari, R. L., A. M. Penz Jr., A. M. Kessler, H. M. Edwards Jr., J. L. Emmert, and D. M. Webel. 2005. Use of digestible amino acids and the concept of ideal protein in feed formulation for broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:195–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dean, D. W., T. D. Bidner, and L. L. Southern. 2006. Glycine supplementation to low protein, amino acid-supplemented diets supports optimal performance of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 85:288–296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deschepper, K., and G. D. Groote. 1995. Effect of dietary protein, essential and non-essential amino acids on the performance and carcase composition of male broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 36:229–245.

D’Mello, J. F. P. 2003. Responses of growing poultry to amino acids. Pages 237–263 in Amino Acids in Animal Nutrition. J. F. P. D’Mello, ed. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

Emmert, J. L., and D. H. Baker. 1997. Use of the ideal protein concept for precision formulation of amino acid levels in broiler diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:462–470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Faria, D. E., R. H. Harms, and G. B. Russell. 2002. Threonine requirement of commercial laying hens fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Poult. Sci. 81:809–814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fisher, C., T. R. Morris, and R. C. Jennings. 1973. A model for the description and prediction of the response of laying hens to amino acid intake. Br. Poult. Sci. 14:469–484.[Web of Science][Medline]

Harms, R. H., and G. B. Russell. 2000a. Evaluation of the isoleucine requirement of the commercial layer in a corn-soybean meal diet. Poult. Sci. 79:1154–1157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harms, R. H., and G. B. Russell. 2000b. Evaluation of tryptophan requirement of the commercial layer by using a corn-soybean meal basal diet. Poult. Sci. 79:740–742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harms, R. H., and G. B. Russell. 2001. Evaluation of valine requirement of the commercial layer using a corn-soybean meal basal diet. Poult. Sci. 80:215–218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heger, J., S. Mengesha, and D. Vodehnal. 1998. Effect of essential:total nitrogen ratio on protein utilization in the growing pig. Br. J. Nutr. 80:537–544.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hurwitz, S., and S. Bornstein. 1973. The protein and amino acid requirements of laying hens: Suggested models for calculation. Poult. Sci. 52:1124–1134.[Web of Science][Medline]

Ishibashi, T., Y. Ogawa, T. Itoh, S. Fujimura, K. Koide, and R. Watanabe. 1998. Threonine requirements of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 77:998–1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Izquierdo, O. A., C. M. Parsons, and D. H. Baker. 1988. Bioavailability of lysine in L-lysine·HCl. J. Anim. Sci. 66:2590–2597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jais, C., F. X. Roth, and M. Kirchgessner. 1995. The determination of the optimum ratio between the essential amino acids in laying hen diets. Arch. Geflügelkd. 59:292–302.

Jones, J. D. 1964. Lysine—arginine antagonism in the chick. J. Nutr. 84:313–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kidd, M. T., and B. J. Kerr. 1998. Dietary arginine and lysine ratios in Large White toms. 2. Lack of interaction between arginine:lysine ratios and electrolyte balance. Poult. Sci. 77:864–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leeson, S., and J. D. Summers. 2001. Nutrition of the chicken. 4th ed. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Leeson, S., and J. D. Summers. 2005. Commercial poultry production. 3rd ed. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Lewis, A. J. 2003. Methionine-cystine relationships in pig nutrition. Pages 143–155 in Amino Acids in Animal Nutrition. J. F. P. D’Mello, ed. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

Liu, Z., G. Wu, M. M. Bryant, and D. A. Roland Sr. 2005. Influence of added synthetic lysine in low-protein diets with the methionine plus cystine to lysine ratio maintained at 0.75. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:174–182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Llames, C. R., and J. Fontaine. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 77:1362–1402.[Web of Science]

Lumpkins, B. S., and A. B. Batal. 2005. The bioavailability of lysine and phosphorus in distillers dried grains with solubles. Poult. Sci. 84:581–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mack, S., D. Bercovici, G. D. Goote, B. Leclercq, M. Lippens, M. Pack, J. B. Schutte, and S. van Cauwenberghe. 1999. Ideal amino acid profile and dietary lysine specification for broiler chickens of 20 to 40 days of age. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:257–265.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mendes, A. A., S. E. Watkins, J. A. England, E. A. Saleh, A. L. Waldroup, and P. W. Waldroup. 1997. Influence of dietary lysine levels and arginine:lysine ratios on performance of broilers exposed to heat or cold stress during the period of three to six weeks of age. Poult. Sci. 76:472–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morris, T. R. 1999. Experimental design and analysis in animal sciences. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. National Academics Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. National Academics Press, Washington, DC.

Robbins, K. R. 1986. A method, SAS program, and example for fitting the broken-line to growth data. University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 86–09, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

Robbins, K. R., A. M. Saxton, and L. L. Southern. 2006. Estimation of nutrient requirements using broken-line regression analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 84(Suppl. 1):E155–E165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Russell, G. B., and R. H. Harms. 1999. Tryptophan requirement of the commercial hen. Poult. Sci. 78:1283–1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schutte, J. B., J. De Jong, and H. L. Bertram. 1994. Requirement of the laying hen for sulfur amino acids. Poult. Sci. 73:274–280.[Web of Science][Medline]

Schutte, J. B., and W. Smink. 1998. Requirement of the laying hen for apparent fecal digestible lysine. Poult. Sci. 77:697–701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shivazad, M., R. H. Harms, G. B. Russell, D. E. Faria, and R. S. Antar. 2002. Re-evaluation of the isoleucine requirement of the commercial layer. Poult. Sci. 81:1869–1872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Snedecor, G. W. 1946. Statistical methods. 4th ed. Iowa State College Press, Ames.

Waldroup, P. W., and H. M. Hellwig. 1995. Methionine and total sulfur amino acid requirements influenced by stage of production. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:283–292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bregendahl, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoehler, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS