|
|
||||||||
MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY |


,2
* Mineral Nutrition Research Division, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, P. R. China; and
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing 100094, P. R. China
2 Corresponding author: wlysz{at}263.net
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: divalent metal transporter 1 nucleotide sequence mRNA level small intestine broiler
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, some of the molecular details of small intestinal Mn transport have been revealed in mammals. Divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), also named divalent cation transporter-1 or natural resistance-associated macrophage protein-2 (Nramp2), was found to be an electrogenic transporter of divalent cation, including Mn2+ (Gunshin et al., 1997). Overexpression of DMT1 in cultured cells resulted in increased Mn uptake (Forbes and Gros, 2003), and incubation with anti-DMT1 antibody blocked uptake of bivalent Mn (Conrad et al., 2000). The Belgrade (b) rat, which possesses a point mutation in DMT1 (G185R), exhibited impaired Mn metabolism (Chua and Morgan, 1997). Solubilized Mn that was released from the stomach into the duodenum was transported across the microvilli via the transport protein DMT1 (Canonne-Hergaux et al., 1999; Trinder et al., 2000; Knopfel et al., 2005). Yeast can be used as a model to study metal transmembrane (TM) import and export functions, which are universal steps in metal homeostasis that are highly conserved in evolution (Irazusta et al., 2006). Of 2 members of the Nramp family of metal transporter proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Smf1p and Smf2p), Smf1p mediated cell-surface uptake of Mn2+ and was required to resist chelator stress; Smf2p enabled efflux from endocytic vesicles, which was required in all growth conditions for the distribution of Mn2+ to the mitochondria and Golgi to sustain Mn2+-dependent activities (superoxide dismutase and sugar transferase, respectively; Cohen et al., 2004), including some that were required for yeast growth (Paidhungat and Garrett, 1998; Eguez et al., 2004).
To our knowledge, DMT1 cDNA sequences have been cloned and sequenced from the human, mouse, and rat (Vidal et al., 1993; Gruenheid et al., 1995; Gunshin et al., 1997). However, in poultry, DMT1 cDNA sequences in the small intestine have not yet been reported. Therefore, in this study, we report the cloning and sequencing of the chicken DMT1, characterization of the proteins deduced from the cDNA sequences, and their expression in the small intestinal segments of broilers.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The total RNA was extracted from the mucosa of the different intestinal segments in the male broilers by using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers protocol. Before the first-strand cDNA synthesis, DNAase I treatment of the total RNA was necessary if the total RNA samples were seriously contaminated with genomic DNA.
Cloning and Sequencing of the Small Intestinal DMT1 cDNA Sequences of Chickens
Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was carried out according to the method of Bu et al. (2001) with some modifications. The 3' ends of the chicken DMT1 transcripts were amplified by using 3' RACE. Total RNA (1 µg) extracted from the broiler duodenum was reverse transcribed by using Superscript III RT reverse transcription (Invitrogen) and RACE-1 primer (5'-GGCCACGCG TCGACTAGTACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3') according to the manufacturers instructions. All the subsequent PCR reactions contained the following components unless otherwise stated: 2.5 µL of PCR buffer (Tiangen Bio. Co., Beijing, China), 1.5 mmol/L of MgCl2, 12.5 pmol of each primer, and 5 units of LongTaq polymerase (Tiangen Bio. Co.) in 25-µL reaction volume. The PCR reactions were carried out by using a DNA thermal cycler (PTC-200, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with the following Touchdown PCR cycle conditions: 5-min denaturation at 95°C, 16 cycle of 1-min denaturation at 94°C, 1-min annealing at 70°C (lower 1°C/cycle), and 2-min extension at 72°C; 20 cycles of 1-min denaturation at 94°C, 1-min annealing at 55°C, and 2-min extension at 72°C, followed by a final 10-min extension at 72°C. By referring to the housekeeping amino acid sequences IESDLQS and FLDKYGLR of DMT1 in the mammalian species, gene-specific primers (GSP) were designed for 3' RACE. The first-round PCR was carried out with 12.5 pmol each of GSP1 (5'-ATCGAGTCCGACCTGCAGTC-3') and universal amplification primer (UAP; 5'-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3) by using 1 µL of the reverse transcription reaction products as template. The amplification products were diluted to 0.5 mL with double-distilled water. The second-round PCR was performed by using 12.5 pmol of GSP2 (5'-TTCCTGGACAAATATGGTCTGC-3'), 12.5 pmol of UAP, and 1 µL of diluted first-round PCR products. The resulting products were electrophoresed on a 1% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel. The area corresponding to the estimated size of the largest specific bands on the probed membrane were excised and purified by using a DNA Quick Extraction kit (Tiangen Bio. Co.) according to the manufacturers instructions. The resulting ~1.3- and ~1.1-kb products were subcloned with the pMD-18T vector system (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturers instructions, and the products were sequenced by using an ABI Prism 3730 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For 5' RACE, all GSP were designed according to the sequencing results of the 3' RACE products. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized by using the primer GSP3 (5'-GCACGACGCGGCAAAGAAG-3'). A poly(A) tail was appended to the 5' end of the first strand of cDNA by using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Promega, Madison, WI) after being purified by the Microcon YM-100 filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA) at 37°C for 5 min. The poly(dA)-tailed cDNA was then amplified with RACE-1 primer, UAP, and GSP4 (5'-TGCAGGTACATATTGTGCGGC-3') by using an annealing temperature of 60°C. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. The extraction, cloning, and sequencing of PCR products were done as described above. In all cases, at least 4 separate clones were sequenced to correct for any PCR errors.
Sequence Analyses of the Nucleotides and Amino Acids of the DMT1
The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of DMT1 isoforms for chickens were subjected to BLAST searching at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Multiple comparisons of the nucleotide sequences were then performed by BioEdit (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/). Characterization of chicken DMT1 isoforms included determinations of their molecular weight, amino acid composition, hydrophobicity, TM region characteristics, and signal peptide analysis. Hydrophobicity was analyzed by using ProtScale and ExPASy, and evidence for TM regions was analyzed by using ExPASy (prediction parameters: TM-helix length between 17 and 33). Parameters used in the ProtScale analysis included a window size of 9, a window weight on the edges of 100%, the linear weight variation model, and no normalization of the scale. Protein signal peptides were analyzed by SignalP 3.0 software (Bendtsen et al., 2004; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-3.0/). Analyses used neural networks and hidden Markov models trained on eukaryotes.
DMT1 mRNA Expression in the Different Small Intestinal Segments of Broilers
The DMT1 mRNA levels in the mucosa of different small intestinal segments were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with an ABI Prism 7000 instrument (Applied Biosystems). Briefly, the RNA integrity was confirmed by gel electrophoresis, and the concentration of the total RNA was determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry (model Cary-100, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). One microgram of the total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA by using random hexamer primers (Invitrogen). Divalent metal transporter 1 and β-actin were amplified in ABI SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) from the cDNA with specific primers. The real-time RT-PCR primers were as follows: the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms forward 5'-AGCCGTTCACCAC TTATTTCG-3', reverse 5'-GGTCCAAATAGGCGATGC TC-3'; chicken DMT1 isoform I forward 5'-AGCCATCCT CAGCGTCATCT-3', reverse 5'-CCTCCATCTCCCACC GTCA-3'; chicken DMT1 isoform II forward 5'-GGCGG TGCGGTCATCCTCCT-3', reverse 5'-ACCCGGCGTAG CGCAGTCAC-3'; and β-actin forward 5'-GAGAAATTG TGCGTGACATCA-3', reverse 5'-CCTGAACCTCTCAT TGCCA-3'. For quantifying DMT1 and β-actin, we used the standard curve method described by Tchernitchko et al. (2002). Relative standard curves were obtained by blotting the cycle threshold obtained following PCR amplification of serial dilutions of a steady quantity of the plasmid containing the corresponding cDNA. Because the expression levels of β-actin mRNA were identical in the different intestinal segments of the chicken, β-actin was used as the endogenous control (Mete et al., 2005). The PCR products of DMT1 were normalized to the β-actin level.
Statistical Analysis
Data on the total mRNA levels of the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms, the mRNA levels of chicken DMT1 isoform I, and the mRNA levels of chicken DMT1 isoform II in the different small intestinal segments were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with the GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). The difference between the chicken DMT1 isoform I mRNA level and the chicken DMT1 isoform II mRNA level in each small intestinal segment was analyzed by the t-test procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Hydrophobicity, TM Regions, and Functional Regions of Broiler DMT1 Proteins
Analyses of hydrophobicity and the TM regions in amino acid sequences showed that DMT1 proteins were predicted to be highly hydrophobic, with characteristics of the integral membrane protein. Hydropathy profile analysis of chicken DMT1 proteins with the Kyte-Doolittle algorithm (Kyte and Doolittle, 1982) identified a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 12 highly hydrophobic putative TM domains in the 2 amino acid sequences (underlined in Figure 2
). The amino and carboxy terminals of proteins would be intracellular. Results from the protein signal peptide analysis indicated that DMT1 proteins were nonsecretory cytoplasmic proteins (data not shown). Interestingly, some of the TM domains predicted in the amino terminal half of chicken DMT1 proteins (TM 1, 2, 4, 5) and 1 (TM 9) in their carboxy terminal half contained 1 charged residue, whereas the TM 3 included 2 such residues. The amino acid sequences of the 2 chicken DMT1 proteins showed 3 potential N-linked glycosylation signals (N-X-S/T; Marshall, 1972; positions 278, 332, and 345), and 2 of them (positions 332 and 345) clustered in the fourth extracellular loop flanked by the 2 TM domains delineated by residues 292 to 309 and 355 to 374. These motifs were imports for the function of DMT1 and were conserved in the mammals (Vidal et al., 1993; Gruenheid et al., 1995; Gunshin et al., 1997). The consensus transport motif was detected at positions 380 to 399 in the fourth intracellular loop, flanked by the 2 TM domains defined by residues 355 to 374 and 408 to 425 (underlined in Figure 2
). This inner membrane consensus motif has been detected in the predicted intracellular loop of the membrane subunits of several periplasmic transport systems of gram-negative bacteria (Dassa and Hofnung, 1985; Kerppola and Ames, 1992), and was also described in a few eukaryotic proteins (Vidal et al., 1993). All these results strongly suggest that, like their orthologous sequences, the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms are the integral membrane proteins with the following membrane topology for an even number of 10 or 12 TM domains. The amino terminus of the orthologous proteins would be intracellular, followed by 10 or 12 TM domains arranged in 5 or 6 TM loops, which would position the carboxy terminus to the intracellular phase of the membrane. The positioning of the cluster of N-linked glycosylation signals to a putative extracellular domain of the proteins and the consensus transport motif to an intracellular domain together suggest that the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms have a potential transport function.
DMT1 mRNA Expression in the Different Small Intestinal Segments of Broilers
In this study, we used real-time RT-PCR to quantify the total mRNA levels of the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms, the mRNA level of chicken DMT1 isoform I, and the mRNA level of chicken DMT1 isoform II in the different small intestinal segments of broilers (Figure 3
). The total mRNA levels of the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms, the mRNA levels of chicken DMT1 isoform I, and the mRNA levels of chicken DMT1 isoform II in the duodenum and jejunum were higher (P < 0.002) than those in the ileum. There was no significant difference (P > 0.26) for the above 3 indices between the duodenum and jejunum. The mRNA level of the chicken DMT1 isoform I was higher (P < 0.001) than that of the chicken DMT1 isoform II in each small intestinal segment of broilers. The DMT1 gene produces 2 alternatively spliced transcripts generated by the differential use of two 3' exons encoding distinct C-termini of the protein as well as distinct 3' UTR in mammals (Lee et al., 1998). One DMT1 isoform (DMT1-IRE) contains an IRE in its 3' UTR, whereas another DMT1 splice isoform (DMT1-non-IRE) does not (Lee et al., 1998). Expression of DMT1-IRE mRNA was highest in the duodenum, and decreased toward the ileum in the small intestine of rats. Divalent metal transporter 1-non-IRE mRNA appeared to be weakly expressed in all small intestinal segments of rats (Hubert and Hentze, 2002). We did not find such an IRE sequence as CNNNNNCAGUG in the mRNA of the 2 chicken DMT1 isoforms; therefore, the mRNA level of each chicken DMT1 isoform in the small intestine of broilers was not comparable to the mRNA level of the homologous gene isoform in mammals. However, our results demonstrated that DMT1 mRNA was expressed ubiquitously in the mucosa of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of broilers, which was consistent with the results of Mete et al. (2005) and with findings in mammals (Gunshin et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 2006). The total mRNA level of the 2 DMT1 isoforms in the small intestine of broilers did not entirely agree with the previous findings. Using 4 mynahs and 4 chickens (strains not shown) fed a normal diet, Mete et al. (2005) studied the DMT1 expression profile in the small intestine and found that DMT1 expression was highest in the jejunum of 2 kinds of birds and was lowest in the duodenum, whereas there was no difference in DMT1 expression between the duodenum and ileum in the mynah. In mammals, DMT1 mRNA expression was highest in the duodenum, and decreased toward the colon (Gunshin et al. 1997; Hubert and Hentze, 2002). The animal species and strains used, the positions of sampling, and animal physiological conditions, especially the Mn2+ store in the body, might explain the differences in the above results. For example, both diet and strain, and the interaction between diet and strain significantly influenced DMT1 mRNA expression in the duodenum of the rat (Dupic et al., 2002), and iron treatment changed the DMT1 expression only at the apical surface of Caco-2 cells, but not in the whole-cell homogenates (Johnson et al., 2005).
|
In conclusion, 2 kinds of full-length cDNA sequences coding for chicken DMT1 were successfully cloned and sequenced in the present study. To our knowledge, this is the first report in DMT1 of the complete cDNA of the avian species. Analyses of hydrophobicity, the TM region, and signal peptides of DMT1 proteins deduced by nucleotide sequences suggested that the chicken DMT1 isoforms are TM proteins with several conserved peptide sequences in other species. The real-time RT-PCR assay showed that DMT1 was widely expressed in the different intestinal segments of broilers, but it was expressed more abundantly in the duodenum and jejunum than in the ileum.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication September 1, 2007. Accepted for publication January 3, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beitz, D. C., and R. S. Allen. 1984. Digestion and absorption. Pages 367–375 in Dukes Physiology of Domestic Animals. 10th ed. M. J. Swenson, ed. Cornell University Press, London, UK.
Bendtsen, J. D., H. Nielsen, G. Heijne, and B. Brunak. 2004. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J. Mol. Biol. 340:783–795.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Birtenchamps, A. J., S. T. Miller, and G. C. Cotzias. 1966. Interdependence of routes excreting manganese. Am. J. Physiol. 211:217–224.
Bu, Y. Q., X. G. Luo, S. F. Li, C. Lu, Y. W. Li, X. Kuang, B. Liu, J. F. Li, and S. X. Yu. 2001. Cloning and sequence analysis of manganese-containing superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) cDNA of chickens. Chin. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 17:463–467.
Burnett, W. T., R. R. Bigelow, A. W. Kimball, and G. W. Sheppard. 1952. Radiomanganese studies on the mouse, rat and pancreatic fistula dog. Am. J. Physiol. 168:620–625.
Canonne-Hergaux, F., S. Gruenheid, P. Ponka, and P. Gros. 1999. Cellular and subcellular localization of the Nramp2 iron transporter in the intestinal brush border and regulation by dietary iron. Blood 93:4406–4417.
Chua, A. C., and E. H. Morgan. 1997. Manganese metabolism is impaired in the Belgrade laboratory rat. J. Comp. Physiol. B 167:361–369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cohen, A., H. Nelson, and N. Nelson. 2004. Metal-ion transporters from yeast to human diseases. Pages 135–145 in The Nramp Family. M. F. M. Cellier and P. Gros, ed. Kluwer Academic/Landes, New York. NY.
Conrad, M. E., J. N. Umbreit, E. G. Moore, L. N. Hainsworth, M. Porubcin, M. J. Simovich, M. T. Nakada, K. Dolan, and M. D. Garrick. 2000. Separate pathways for cellular uptake of ferric and ferrous iron. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 279:G767–G774.
Dassa, E., and M. Hofnung. 1985. Sequence of gene malG in E. coli K12: Homologies between integral membrane components from binding protein-dependent transport systems. EMBO J. 4:2287–2293.[Web of Science][Medline]
Davis, C. D., T. L. Wolf, and J. L. Gerger. 1992. Varying levels of manganese and iron affect absorption and gut endogenous losses of manganese by rats. J. Nutr. 122:1300–1308.
Dupic, F., S. Fruchon, M. Bensaid, O. Loreal, P. Brissot, N. Borot, M. P. Roth, and H. Coppin. 2002. Duodenal mRNA expression of iron related genes in response to iron loading and iron deficiency in four strains of mice. Gut 51:648–653.
Eguez, L., Y. S. Chung, A. Kuchibhatla, M. Paidhungat, and S. Garrett. 2004. Yeast Mn2+ transporter, Smf1p, is regulated by ubiquitin-dependent vacuolar protein sorting. Genetics 167:107–117.
Fasolato, C., M. Hoth, G. Matthews, and R. Penneer. 1993. Ca2+ and Mn2+ influx through receptor-mediated activation of nonspecific cation channels in mast cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3068–3072.
Forbes, J. R., and P. Gros. 2003. Iron, manganese, and cobalt transport by Nramp1 (SLC11a1) and Nramp2 (SLC11a2) expressed at the plasma membrane. Blood 102:1884–1892.
Fromter, E., and J. Diamond. 1972. Route of passive ion permeation in epithelia. Nature 235:9–13.[CrossRef]
Gruenheid, S., M. Gellier, S. Vidal, and P. Gros. 1995. Identification and characterization of a second mouse Nramp gene. Genomics 25:514–525.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gunshin, H., B. Mackenzie, U. V. Berger, Y. Gunshin, M. F. Romero, W. F. Boron, S. Nussberger, and J. L. Gollan. 1997. Cloning and characterization of a mammalian proton-coupled metal-ion transporter. Nature 388:482–488.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hentze, M. W., M. U. Muckenthaler, and N. C. Andrews. 2004. Balancing acts: Molecular control of mammalian iron metabolism. Cell 117:285–297.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hubert, N., and M. W. Hentze. 2002. Previously uncharacterized isoforms of divalent metal transporter (DMT)-1: Implications for regulation and cellular function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12345–12350.
Irazusta, V., E. Cabiscol, G. Reverter-Branchat, J. Ros, and J. Tamarit. 2006. Manganese is the link between frataxin and iron-sulfur deficiency in the yeast model of Friedreich ataxia. J. Biol. Chem. 281:12227–12232.
Ji, F., X. G. Luo, L. Lu, B. Liu, and S. Y. Yu. 2006a. Effects of manganese source and calcium on manganese uptake by in vitro everted gut sacs of broilers intestinal segments. Poult. Sci. 85:1217–1225.
Ji, F., X. G. Luo, L. Lu, B. Liu, and S. Y. Yu. 2006b. Effects of manganese source on manganese absorption by the intestine of broiler. Poult. Sci. 85:1947–1952.
Johnson, D. M., S. Yamaji, J. Tennant, S. K. Srai, and P. A. Sharp. 2005. Regulation of divalent metal transporter expression in human intestinal epithelial cells following exposure to non-haem iron. FEBS Lett. 579:1923–1929.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnston, K. L., D. M. Johnson, J. Marks, S. K. Srai, E. S. Debnam, and P. A. Sharp. 2006. Non-haem iron transport in the rat proximal colon. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 36:35–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kerppola, R. E., and G. F. L. Ames. 1992. Topology of the hydrophobic membrane-bound components of the histidine periplasmic permease: Comparison with other members of the family. J. Biol. Chem. 267:2329–2336.
Knopfel, M., L. Zhao, and M. D. Garrick. 2005. Transport of divalent transition-metal ions is lost in small-intestinal tissue of b/b Belgrade rats. Biochemistry 44:3454–3465.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kozak, M. 1986. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiation codon that modulates initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44:283–292.[Medline]
Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathy of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157:105–132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lee, P. L., T. Gelbart, C. West, C. Halloran, and E. Beutler. 1998. The human Nramp2 gene: Characterization of the gene structure, alternative splicing, promoter region and polymorphisms. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 24:199–215.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Marshall, R. D. 1972. Glycoproteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 41:673–702.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mete, A., R. Jalving, B. A. van Oast, J. E. van Dijk, and J. J. M. Marx. 2005. Intestinal over-expression of iron transporters induces iron overload in birds in captivity. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 34:151–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Milanick, M. A., and D. S. Frame. 1991. Kinetic models of Na-Ca exchange in ferret red blood cells. Interaction of intracellular Na, extracellular Ca, Cd and Mn. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 639:604–615.[Web of Science][Medline]
NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Oschman, J. L. 1980. Water transport, cell junctions, and "structured water." Pages 141–170 in Membrane Structure and Function. E. E. Bittar, ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
Paidhungat, M., and S. Garrett. 1998. Cdc 1 and the vacuole coordinately regulate Mn2+ homeostasis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 148:1787–1798.
Roth, J. A. 2006. Homeostatic and toxic mechanisms regulating manganese uptake, retention, and elimination. Biol. Res. 39:45–57.[Web of Science][Medline]
SAS Institute. 2003. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Scott, M. L., M. C. Nesheim, and R. J. Young. 1976. Nutrition of the Chicken, M. L. Scott and Associates, Ithaca, NY.
Tchernitchko, D., M. Bourgeois, M. E. Martin, and C. Beaumont. 2002. Expression of the two mRNA isoforms of the iron transporter Nramp2/DMT1 in mice and function of the iron responsive element. Biochem. J. 363:449–455.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Thomson, A. B. R., D. Olatunbosun, and L. S. Valberg. 1971. Interrelation of intestinal transport system for manganese and iron. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 78:642–655.[Web of Science][Medline]
Trinder, D., P. S. Oates, C. Thomas, J. Sadleir, and E. H. Morgan. 2000. Localisation of divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) to the microvillus membrane of rat duodenal enterocytes in iron deficiency, but to hepatocytes in iron overload. Gut 46:270–276.
Vidal, S. M., D. Malo, K. Vogan, E. Skamene, and P. Gros. 1993. Natural resistance to infection with intracellular parasites: Isolation of a candidate for Bcg. Cell 73:469–485.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. P. Bai, L. Lu, X. G. Luo, and B. Liu Kinetics of Manganese Absorption in Ligated Small Intestinal Segments of Broilers Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2596 - 2604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |