|
|
||||||||
IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH, AND DISEASE: Research Note |
,2
,
* Avian Diseases Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine of Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China;
Key Laboratory of Animal Diseases and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China; and
College of Life Science and Technology of Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
2 Corresponding author: chenganchun{at}vip.163.com
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Salmonella Enteritidis pathogenesis quantitative study duck
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of the increased prevalence of Salmonella Enteritidis and its complex life cycle, it is important to understand the correlation between the levels of this bacterium in systemic organs and the progression of the infection; this has not been described previously. Understanding this correlation will help gain further insight into the pathogenesis of Salmonella Enteritidis infections. The objectives of the present study were to determine the pathogenesis of a high-virulence strain of Salmonella Enteritidis (No. MY1; phage type 4, isolated from Peking ducks and maintained by the Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, China) in ducks by a time-course study using a quantitative TaqMan assay (Deng et al., 2008) and to correlate these findings with the results obtained from the immunohistochemical localization and histopathological examinations of selected Salmonella Enteritidis-infected tissues; we believe that this analysis will help provide valuable insights into the etiology of Salmonella Enteritidis infections.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A high-virulence strain of Salmonella Enteritidis (No. MY1, phage type 4) was isolated from Peking ducks and maintained by the Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province (Deng et al., 2008). The serotype and phage type of the isolates were determined by the National Center for Medical Culture Collection (Beijing, China).
Experimental Birds and Samples
Nine-day-old white Peking ducks free from Salmonella Enteritidis infection were used in the study. Before challenge with Salmonella Enteritidis, all ducks were found to be negative for Salmonella Enteritidis-specific antibodies and Salmonella Enteritidis-specific antigens by ELISA and PCR, respectively (Gast and Beard, 1990; Deng et al., 2008). The ducks were maintained in isolation units in a biosecure animal building and fed a commercial duck diet ad libitum. In brief, Salmonella Enteritidis cells were grown overnight in a Luria-Bertani broth. The cells were cultured overnight and the presumptive live number of Salmonella Enteritidis cells was determined by the spread-plate method. Thereafter, a group of 48 ducks were subcutaneously injected with a high-virulence S. Enteritidis strain (No. MY1; inoculation site, back). Each bird was inoculated with 4.0 x 105 cells in 0.2 mL of water. Another group of 36 ducks was treated with an equal volume of water and used as a control group. The liver, spleen, lung, kidney, jejunum, ileum, rectum, cecum, bursa of Fabricius, thymus, and Harderian gland were analyzed by a fluorescent quantitative PCR assay at postinoculation (PI) times of 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h, and 2, 3, 6, and 9 d.
At each time point, 3 ducks were randomly selected from the infection and control groups, and their tissue samples were collected and processed for further analyses. Extraction of DNA from the tissue samples was performed as described previously (Deng et al., 2008).
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Salmonella Enteritidis DNA
In our previous study, we established a serovarspecific real-time PCR assay (designed with SdfI, GenBank Accession No. AF370707.1; Deng et al., 2008). A real-time PCR assay was carried out using a real-time PCR core kit (R-PCR version 2.1, Takara, Dalian, China) with an Icycler iQ Real-time PCR Detection System (version 3.1, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and was performed as described previously. The PCR amplification was performed in a 25-µL reaction mixture containing 0.6 µL of each primer (10 µmol/L), 0.75 µL of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (10 mmol/L), 1.25 U of Ex Taq DNA Polymerase (Ex Taq Hot Start Version, Takara), 5 µL of 5x PCR buffer (Mg2+ free), 0.8 µL of TaqMan probe (5 µmol/L), 0.5 µL of Mg2+ (250 mmol/L), and 5 µL of templates. The reaction mixture was subsequently made up to a volume of 25 µL with deionized water. Each PCR run consisted of a 5-min hot start at 95°C, which activated the conjugated polymerase, followed by 40 cycles consisting of 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 55°C, and a fluorescent read step. In this study, we used the real-time PCR assay specific to serovars to study the Salmonella Enteritidis loads in various duck tissues following subcutaneous infection.
Immunohistochemical Localization of Salmonella Enteritidis Antigen
Small pieces of tissues were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed for paraffin embedding, and sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm. The sections were stained for Salmonella Enteritidis antigen by using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method as described previously (Islam et al., 1993). In brief, deparaffinized and rehydrated tissue sections were incubated with rabbit anti-Salmonella Enteritidis antiserum. Then, an avidin-biotin-peroxidase staining kit (ExtrAvidin, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used to trace the rabbit antibodies bound to the site of antigen localization. Tissue sections from the uninfected control samples were used as negative controls. The sections were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (version 3.0, Takara), and the slides were examined and photographed using a photomicroscope.
For histopathological examination, the paraffin-embedded sections were cut at 5 µm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as described previously (Mutinelli et al., 2003).
Statistical Analysis
The PCR and data acquisition and analysis were performed using the iCycler iQ Optical system software (version 3.1; Bio-Rad). The number of target copies in the reaction was deduced from the threshold cycle (Ct) values. The threshold cycle value corresponds to the fractional cycle number at which the fluorescence emission exceeds the standard deviation of the mean baseline emission by 15-fold. Plasmid DNA containing the target amplicon was diluted to contain 7.0 x 102 to 7.0 x 108 copies of the target DNA per test tube and used as the plasmid standard series. All samples were analyzed 3 times by the fluorescent quantitative PCR assay, and concentrations of the target DNA detected were expressed as the mean log10 of the bacterial genome copy number per gram of tissue tested. The real-time PCR data were analyzed using version 11 of the SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The comparison of means was performed using Duncans multiple-range test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The kinetics of the bacterial DNA loads in the other parenchymatous organs varied. At 8 h PI, before the appearance of clinical signs of the infection, it was observed that the liver tissues contained significantly greater levels of Salmonella Enteritidis than the lungs and the kidneys (Table 1
). However, in dead ducks, the bacterial concentration in the lungs and kidneys was greater than that in the liver tissues. In the liver, bacterial antigen-containing hepatocytes were mainly observed within necrotic foci or around blood vessels. The Salmonella Enteritidis antigen was also found in the epithelial cells of the alveoli and the tubular epithelial cells of the kidney. The following pathological features were observed in the organs examined: swollen tubular epithelial cells and nephrosis in the kidney; necrotic foci and varying degrees of hepatocyte fat degeneration of hepatocytes in the liver; and slightly hyperemic and hemorrhagic cribriform changes in the brain. Severe hyperemia, hemorrhages, and heterophil infiltration in the lungs were also observed. The overall pattern of antigen distribution and microscopic lesions in the organs examined were similar to those reported in previous studies (Holt and Porter, 1992; Akaki et al., 1997; Deng et al., 2008; Yan et al., 2008). The factors that determine the levels of Salmonella Enteritidis load in various tissues have not been fully understood; however, the high Salmonella Enteritidis DNA loads in multiple systemic organs results in severe tissue pathology, which accelerates the progression of the infection.
The present study provides a detailed description of the patterns of the Salmonella Enteritidis load, the immunohistochemical localization of the Salmonella Enteritidis antigen, and the histopathological examinations in various organs. The Salmonella Enteritidis load in systemic organs was observed to be closely correlated with the progression of the infection. The high bacterial loads and the high levels of replication in the lymphoid and small-intestinal tissues might reflect the presence of abundant target epithelial and lymphoid cells in these tissues. The control group did not generate any positive results, at any time point of the study, at any location. This study provided valuable insights into the etiology and pathogenesis of Salmonella Enteritidis infections in ducks.
Fluorescent quantitative PCR has become a potentially powerful tool in microbiological diagnostics because of its simplicity, rapidity, reproducibility, and accuracy. However, PCR inhibitors or a large amount of DNA from background organisms may result in variable results. In our studies, standard precautions were followed to prevent PCR contamination by adhering to strict laboratory practices (Jothikumar et al., 2005). Furthermore, in preliminary experiments, we used the phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol method to extract DNA from control group tissues (described above) and added 2.0 x 106 copies of the plasmid DNA standards for each control group DNA sample. Finally, fluorometric cycler measurements were performed as described above. The results were consistent with our expectations, and the variability in the results was statistically low at <4.3%. We believe that the methodology used in this study provides an important tool for studying the progression of Salmonella Enteritidis infections.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication April 22, 2008. Accepted for publication May 19, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agron, P. G., R. L. Walker, H. Kinde, S. J. Sawyer, D. C. Hayes, J. Wollard, and G. L. Andersen. 2001. Identification by subtractive hybridization of sequences specific for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4984–4991.
Akaki, C., B. Shimazu, T. Baba, S. Tsuji, H. Kodama, M. Mukamoto, and T. Kajikawa. 1997. Possible migration of Harderian gland immunoglobulin a bearing lymphocytes into the cecal tonsil in chickens. Zentralbl. Veterinarmed. B. 44:199–206.[Medline]
Cirillo, D. M., R. H. Valdivia, D. M. Monack, and S. Falkow. 1998. Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival. Mol. Microbiol. 30:175–188.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Deng, S. X., A. C. Cheng, M. S. Wang, and P. Cao. 2007. Study on the gastrointestinal tract distribution of Salmonella Enteritidis in orally infected mice with a species-specific fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction. World J. Gastroenterol. 13:6568–6574.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Deng, S. X., A. C. Cheng, M. S. Wang, and P. Cao. 2008. Serovar-specific real-time quantitative detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in the gastrointestinal tract of ducks after oral challenge. Avian Dis. 52:88–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dhillon, A. S., H. L. Shivaprasad, T. P. Roy, B. Alisantosa, D. Schaberq, D. Bandli, and S. Johnson. 2001. Pathogenicityof environmental origin Salmonellas in specific-pathogen-free chicks. Poult. Sci. 80:1323–1328.
Dibb-Fuller, M. P., E. Allen-Vercoe, C. J. Thorns, and M. J. Woodward. 1999. Fimbriae-and flagella-mediated association with and invasion of cultured epithelial cells by Salmonella Enteritidis. Microbiology 145:1023–1031.
Dunlap, N. E., W. H. Beniamin, R. D. McCall, A. B. Tilden, and D. E. Briles. 1991. A safe site for Salmonella typhimurium is within splenic cells during the early phase of infection in mice. Microb. Pathog. 10:297–310.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Edwards, R. A., D. M. Schifferli, and S. R. Maloy. 2000. A role for Salmonella fimbriae in intraperitoneal infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1258–1262.
Gast, R. K., and C. W. Beard. 1990. Serological detection of experimental Salmonella Enteritidis infections in laying hens. Avian Dis. 34:721–728.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Holt, P. S., and R. E. Porter. 1992. Microbiological and histo pathological effects of an induced-molt fasting procedure on a Salmonella Enteritidis infection in chickens. Avian Dis. 36:610–618.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hope, B. K., R. Baker, E. D. Edel, A. T. Hogue, W. D. Schlosser, R. Whiting, R. M. McDowell, and R. A. Morales. 2002. An overview of the Salmonella Enteritidis risk assessment for shell eggs and egg products. Risk Anal. 22:203–218.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Islam, M. R., J. Nessa, and K. M. Halder. 1993. Detection of duck plague virus antigen in tissues by immunoperoxidase staining. Avian Pathol. 22:389–393.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jothikumar, N., T. L. Cromeans, V. R. Hill, X. Lu, M. D. Sobsev, and D. D. Erdman. 2005. Quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection of human adenoviruses and identification of serotypes 40 and 41. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3131–3136.
Kogut, M. H., L. Rothwell, and P. Kaiser. 2003. Differential regulation of cytokine gene expression by avian heterophils during receptor-mediated phagocytosis of opsonized and nonopsonized Salmonella Enteritidis. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 23:319–327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Massi, M., P. Ioan, R. Budriesi, A. Chiarini, B. Vitali, K. M. Lammers, P. Gionchetti, M. Campieri, A. Lembo, and P. Briqidi. 2006. Effects of probiotic bacteria on gastrointestinal motility in guinea-pig isolated tissue. World J. Gastroenterol. 12:5987–5994.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mutinelli, F., I. Capua, C. Terregino, and G. Cattoli. 2003. Clinical, gross and microscopic findings in different avian species naturally infected during the H7N1 low- and high-pathogenicity avian influenza epidemics in Italy during 1999 and 2000. Avian Dis. 47:844–848.[Web of Science][Medline]
Takata, T., J. Liang, H. Nakano, and Y. Yoshimura. 2003. Invasion of Salmonella Enteritidis in the tissues of reproductive organs in laying Japanese quail: An immunocytochemical study. Poult. Sci. 82:1170–1173.
Turnbull, P. C., and J. E. Richmond. 1978. A model of Salmonella Enteritidis: The behaviour of Salmonella Enteritidis in chick intestine studied by light and electron microscopy. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 59:64–75.[Web of Science][Medline]
Xu, C., Z. S. Li, Y. Q. Du, Y. F. Gong, H. Yang, B. Sun, and Jin. 2007. Construction of recombinant attenuated Salmonella typhimurium DNA vaccine expressing H. pylori ureB and IL-2. World J. Gastroenterol. 13:939–944.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yan, B., A. C. Cheng, M. S. Wang, S. X. Deng, Z. H. Zhang, N. C. Yin, P. Cao, and S. Y. Cao. 2008. Application of indirect immunofluorescent staining method for detection Salmonella Enteritidis in paraffin slices and antigen location in infected duck tissues. World J. Gastroenterol. 7:776–781.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |