|
|
||||||||
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS |
College of Biological Sciences and State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, P. R. China
1 Corresponding author: ninglbau{at}public3.bta.net.cn
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Pax7 alternative splicing myoblast chick
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pax7 expression is throughout early chick embryogenesis (Otto et al., 2006), and Pax7 is expressed during somite development (Jostes et al., 1990). Somite is a transitory structure giving rise to dermomyotome, which is the source skeletal muscle (Christ and Ordahl, 1995; Tajbakhsh and Buckingham, 2000). After myotome is formed, embryonic and fetal myoblasts proliferate and differentiate to form primary and secondary fibers, respectively, by expressing MyoD, Myf5, MRF4, and myogenin (Miller and Stockdale, 1986; Cossu et al., 1988; Smith et al., 1993). During myogensis controlled by muscle-specific transcriptional regulators, responding to external signals, myoblasts withdraw from the cell cycle and fuse together to form multinucleated myotubes (Polesskaya and Rudnicki, 2002).
Growth and regeneration of skeletal muscles of mammals after birth is attributed to satellite cells, which are mononuclear cells located at the periphery of myotube and surrounded by the basal lamina (Schultz and McCormick, 1994). When injured or in response to other signals, quiescent satellite cells are activated and coexpress Pax7 and MyoD, then proliferate, down-regulate Pax7, differentiate, and finally fuse to preexisting myotubes or to each other to form new myotubes (Bischoff, 1994; Zammit et al., 2004). However, some proliferating cells maintain Pax7 but lose MyoD and return to quiescent state (Zammit et al., 2004). Pax7 (–/–) mice have a decreased number of muscle satellite cells, and they are extremely deficient in muscle regeneration when injured, suggesting that Pax7 plays an important role in postnatal renewal and propagation of satellite cells (Oustanina et al., 2004; Kuang et al., 2006).
Here, we found a novel alternative splicing form of chick Pax7 named Pax7–2, which lacked 22 amino acids in its COOH terminal compared with Pax7. Localization of Pax7–2 indicated that Pax7–2 was also expressed in the nucleus of myoblast as Pax7. Luciferase assays showed that Pax7 had the transactivation ability, and Pax7–2 lost it. Then we detected the expression levels of Pax7–2 in chick pectoralis muscle at chick different developmental stages and observed that its expression trend is similar with Pax7 across the period under study.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Skeletal muscle samples were collected from the pectoralis muscle of White Leghorn at different developmental stages. The developmental stages are 7- to 20-d embryo stages, 1 d of age, 3 wk of age, and 1 yr of age. The collection of 7-d chick embryo pectoralis muscle was 166 h after the beginning of incubation. Collection was continued every 24 h until 20-d embryo stage. At every stage, we collected 3 independent samples.
RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription
Total RNA was extracted from skeletal muscle samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Then, total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase I (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) for 30 min at 37°C to ensure that it was free of DNA contamination. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using an oligo(dT)18 and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) according to the protocol of the manufacturer.
Detection of a New Alternative Splicing of Chick Pax7 by Reverse Transcription-PCR and Sequencing
One-day-old chick pectoralis muscle cDNA was used as a template for PCR to amplify Pax7 cDNA. Ex Taq polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan) was used for amplification. Pax7 cDNA was PCR-amplified using primers P1 and P2 (Table 1
) with the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s, 63°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min for 40 cycles. The PCR product was ligated into the T/A cloning vector pMD18-T (Takara) with T4 ligase (Promega, Madison, WI) and then transformed into DH5
and plated on Luria-Bertani with ampicillin and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). Positive clones were selected, and 10 clones were sequenced. A new alternative splicing of chick Pax7 named Pax7–2 was found. The plasmid containing full-length Pax7 was named pMD18-T-Pax7, and the plasmid containing Pax7–2 was named pMD18-T-Pax7–2. To show the 66-bp difference between Pax7 and Pax7–2, primers P3 and P4 (Table 1
) were used with the following PCR conditions: 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 15 s for 35 cycles.
|
Pax7 and Pax7–2 were amplified from pMD18-T-Pax7 and pMD18-T-Pax7–2, respectively, using primers P5 and P6 (Table 1
), which contain Sac I and SalI enzyme sites with the following PCR conditions: 95°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles. Then they were inserted into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech), which was enzymed with Sac I and SalI. Positive clones were selected and sequenced to ensure correction. The 2 fusion protein expression vectors were named pEG-FP-N1-Pax7 and pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2, respectively.
Cell Cultures
Myoblasts were prepared from the pectoralis muscle of 11-d chick embryos as described (Halevy and Lerman, 1993) with slight modifications. In brief, skeletal muscles were digested with 0.1% collagenase I and 0.25% trypsin. Cells were then filtered through a mesh (200 µm), centrifuged, and preplated on a dish for 3 h. After that, cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium (Gibco BRL, Carlsbad, CA) containing 20% fetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco BRL) on dishes precoated with 1.5% gelatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Transfection
Myoblasts were transfected with pEGFP-N1, pEGFP-N1-Pax7, or pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. After 24 h, photos of myoblasts were taken from a Nikon Eclipse TS100 fluorescence microscope (Nikon Inc., Melville, NY). Propidium iodide (Sigma) was used to show the nucleus of myoblast according to the protocol of the manufacturer.
Luciferase Assays
For luciferase assays, 3 copies of e5 sequence were inserted into the pGL3-Promoter (Promega) vector at MluI and BglII enzyme sites to form the pGL3-Promoter-e5 vector. The e5 sequence 5'-CACCGCAC-GATTAGCACCGTTCCGCTCAGG-3' was found in the Drosophila even-skipped (eve) promoter and contained the consensus-binding sequences for the paired domain (Goulding et al., 1991; Schafer et al., 1994). To normalize transfection efficiency, pRL-TK plasmid (Promega) was used. The reporter gene vector pGL3-Promoter-e5 (0.1 µg), the expression plasmid (pEGFP-N1/pEGFP-N1-Pax7/pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2, 0.1 µg), and pRL-TK (2.5 µg) were cotransfected into CHO cells in each well of a 96-well plate using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After 24 h, cells were harvested and assayed for firefly and Renilla luciferase activity. Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Light emission was measured using a 10-s time frame with a luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA). Firefly luciferase light output was normalized to Renilla luciferase output.
Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to quantify the expression of Pax7 (NM_205065
[GenBank]
) and Pax7–2. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was carried out in ABIPrism 7900HT (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems). Plasmids (pMD18-T-Pax7, pMD18-T-Pax7–2, and pMD18-T-GAPDH) containing the target sequences were constructed and were serially diluted for making standard curves. Target values were obtained from the standard curve and were normalized to GAPDH (NM_204305
[GenBank]
). For Pax7–2, primers P7 and P8 (Table 1
) were used; for Pax7, primers P9 and P10 (Table 1
) were used; for GAPDH, primers G1 and G2 (Table 1
) were used. The following quantitative real-time RT-PCR conditions were used: 95°C for 10 min and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 59°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 15 s.
Statistical Analysis
All values were expressed as the mean ± SE, and SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA was also used. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To amplify chick Pax7 cDNA, RT-PCR was conducted. The ~1.87-kb PCR product was inserted into pMD-8-T and then 10 randomly picked-up plasmids were sequenced. Compared with the full-length chick Pax7 (NM_205065
[GenBank]
), 1 alternative splicing of chick Pax7, named Pax7–2, was found. Full-length chick Pax7 has 1,575 nucleotides in its CDS from position 186 to 1760, but Pax7–2 is 66 nt shorter. The 66-nt sequence from position 1332 to 1397 comes from exon 8 of the Pax7 gene. Exclusion of the 66-nt sequence leads to the deletion of 22 amino acids in Pax7–2 protein without changing the reading frame. The structures of Pax7 and Pax7–2 and the 66-nucleotide sequence were shown in Figure 1
.
|
Pax7–2 is Localized in the Nucleus of Chick Myoblast
To characterize the intracellular localization of Pax7–2, we constructed the plasmid pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2, which was inserted in the Pax7–2 coding region at the N terminus of GFP, and the plasmid pEGFP-N1-Pax7, which was inserted in the Pax7 coding region at the N terminus of GFP. It was found that pEGFP-N1, pEG-FP-N1-Pax7, and pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2 were transfected into chick myoblasts, respectively. The fluorescent signals of Pax7-EGFP fusion protein and Pax7–2-EGFP fusion protein in transfected myoblasts were in the area of the nucleus, whereas the fluorescent signal of GFP protein was everywhere in transfected myoblast (Figure 2
). Propidium iodide staining showed the colocalization of Pax7 isoforms and DNA. It indicated that Pax7–2 was localized in the nucleus of chick myoblast as Pax7.
|
The Deleted 22 Amino Acids in Pax7–2 Belong to the Transactivation Domain of Pax7
To test whether the deleted 22 amino acids belong to the transactivation domain of Pax7, luciferase assays were performed in CHO cell line. As a reporter gene, 3 copies of e5 sequence were inserted into the pGL3-Promoter vector. The e5 sequence was found in the Drosophila even-skipped (eve) promoter and contained the consensus-binding sequences for the paired domain (Goulding et al., 1991; Schafer et al., 1994). Cotransfection of this reporter construct with the expression vector pEGFP-N1-Pax7 for Pax7 and pRL-TK resulted in a ~0.5-fold increase in luciferase activity (Figure 3
), when compared with the expression vector pEGFP-N1 and pRL-TK. This demonstrated that chick Pax7 can act as a transactivator. However, cotransfection of this reporter construct with the expression vector pEGFP-N1-Pax7–2 for Pax7–2 and pRL-TK resulted in a ~0.3-fold decrease in luciferase activity (Figure 3
), when compared with the expression vector pEGFP-N1 and pRL-TK. These experiments suggested that the deleted 22 amino acids may belong to the transactivation domain of Pax7. Note that the e5 site is a low-affinity site for Pax7, which may explain the relatively low transactivation by Pax7 (Schafer et al., 1994).
|
To detect the expression levels of Pax7–2 in chick pectoralis muscle at different development stages, quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used. Muscles were prepared from d-7 to d-20 chick embryos, 1-d-old chicks, 3-wk-old chicks, and 1-yr-old chicks, respectively. Expression profile of Pax7–2 was shown in Figure 4A
. Pax7–2 was expressed greatest on embryonic d 12 (P < 0.05). Compared with the expression pattern of Pax7 in Figure 4B
, the expression trend of Pax7–2 was similar with Pax7, although there were some slight differences. From d 7 to 9 of incubation, the expression levels of Pax7 and Pax7–2 were almost the same everyday. Then from d 10 to d 12 of incubation, the expression levels of Pax7 were greater than Pax7–2. On d 12 of incubation, the expression level of Pax7 was 2-fold greater than Pax7–2, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). We observed that the expression of Pax7 showed dramatic decline on d 13 of incubation. Although the expression of Pax7–2 also turned down on d 13 of incubation, it was greater than Pax7 (P < 0.05). From d 14 to d 16 of incubation, the expression levels of Pax7–2 were always greater than Pax7, although the difference did not reach significance. After d 16 of incubation, both Pax7 and Pax7–2 were expressed at much lower levels. In addition, on d 20 of incubation, Pax7–2 was expressed greater than Pax7, although the difference was not significant. However, 1 d later when chicks were born, the expression level of Pax7 turned up when the expression level of Pax7 turned down, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). As chicks grew up, Pax7 and Pax7–2 were expressed at much lower levels. This is consistent with the phenomenon that Pax7 protein expressed the strongest by 1 d posthatch and declined on d 3 and 6 to a similar level (Halevy et al., 2004). Compared with the outside environment, the environment of the embryo stage is more stable. But many inner factors could influence the expression of Pax7 and have an effect on myogenesis. Pax3 represses Pax7 during neural tube and somite development (Borycki et al., 1999). The similar expression trend of Pax7–2 and Pax7 in pectoralis muscle across the period under study may be the result of many factors working together.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication November 26, 2007. Accepted for publication April 21, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bennicelli, J. L., S. Advani, B. W. Schafer, and F. G. Barr. 1999. Pax3 and Pax7 exhibit conserved cis-acting transcription repression domains and utilize a common gain of function mechanism in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Oncogene 18:4348–4356.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bischoff, R. 1994. The satellite cell and muscle regeneration. Pages 97–118 in Myology. A. G. Engel and C. Fanzini-Armstrong, ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Borycki, A. G., J. Li, F. Jin, C. P. Emerson, and J. A. Epstein. 1999. Pax3 functions in cell survival and in Pax7 regulation. Development 126:1665–1674.[Abstract]
Chalepakis, G., F. S. Jones, G. M. Edelman, and P. Gruss. 1994. Pax-3 contains domains for transcription activation and transcription inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12745–12749.
Christ, B., and C. P. Ordahl. 1995. Early stages of chick somite development. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 191:381–396.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cossu, G., G. Ranaldi, M. I. Senni, M. Molinaro, and E. Vivarelli. 1988. Early mammalian myoblasts are resistant to phorbol ester-induced block of differentiation. Development 102:65–69.
Dahl, E., H. Koseki, and R. Balling. 1997. Pax genes and organogenesis. Bioessays 19:755–765.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Goulding, M. D., G. Chalepakis, U. Deutsch, J. R. Erselius, and P. Gruss. 1991. Pax-3, a novel murine DNA binding protein expressed during early neurogenesis. EMBO J. 10:1135–1147.[Web of Science][Medline]
Halevy, O., and O. Lerman. 1993. Retinoic acid induces adult muscle cell differentiation mediated by the retinoic acid receptor-
. J. Cell. Physiol. 154:566–572.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Halevy, O., Y. Piestun, M. Z. Allouh, B. W. Rosser, Y. Rinkevich, R. Reshef, I. Rozenboim, M. Wleklinski-Lee, and Z. Yablonka-Reuveni. 2004. Pattern of Pax7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev. Dyn. 231:489–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jostes, B., C. Walther, and P. Gruss. 1990. The murine paired box gene, Pax7, is expressed specifically during the development of the nervous and muscular system. Mech. Dev. 33:27–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kuang, S., S. B. Charge, P. Seale, M. Huh, and M. A. Rudnicki. 2006. Distinct roles for Pax7 and Pax3 in adult regenerative myogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 172:103–113.
Lamey, T. M., A. Koenders, and M. Ziman. 2004. Pax genes in myogenesis: Alternate transcripts add complexity. Histol. Histopathol. 19:1289–1300.[Web of Science][Medline]
Miller, J. B., and F. E. Stockdale. 1986. Developmental regulation of the multiple cell lineages of the avian embryo. J. Cell Biol. 103:2197–2208.
Otto, A., C. Schmidt, and K. Patel. 2006. Pax3 and Pax7 expression and regulation in the avian embryo. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 211:293–310.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oustanina, S., G. Hause, and T. Braun. 2004. Pax7 directs postnatal renewal and propagation of myogenic satellite cells but not their specification. EMBO J. 23:3430–3439.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Polesskaya, A., and M. A. Rudnicki. 2002. A MyoD-dependent differentiation checkpoint: Ensuring genome integrity. Dev. Cell 3:757–758.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schafer, B. W., T. Czerny, M. Bernasconi, M. Genini, and M. Busslinger. 1994. Molecular cloning and characterization of a human PAX-7 cDNA expressed in normal and neoplastic myocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4574–4582.
Schultz, E., and K. M. McCormick. 1994. Skeletal muscle satellite cells. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 123:213–257.[Web of Science][Medline]
Smith, T. H., N. E. Block, S. J. Rhodes, S. F. Konieczny, and J. B. Miller. 1993. A unique pattern of expression of the four muscle regulatory factor proteins distinguishes somitic from embryonic, fetal and newborn mouse myogenic cells. Development 117:1125–1133.[Abstract]
Tajbakhsh, S., and M. E. Buckingham. 2000. The birth of muscle progenitor cells in the mouse: Spatiotemporal considerations. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 48:225–268.[Web of Science][Medline]
Zammit, P. S., J. P. Golding, Y. Nagata, V. Hudon, T. A. Partridge, and J. R. Beauchamp. 2004. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: A mechanism for self-renewal? J. Cell Biol. 166:347–357.[CrossRef]
Ziman, M. R., S. Fletcher, and P. H. Kay. 1997. Alternate Pax7 transcripts are expressed specifically in skeletal muscle, brain and other organs of adult mice. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29:1029–1036.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |