|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. jpatters@purdue.edu
The intestinal microbiota, epithelium, and immune system provide resistance to enteric pathogens. Recent data suggest that resistance is not solely due to the sum of the components, but that cross-talk between these components is also involved in modulating this resistance. Inhibition of pathogens by the intestinal microbiota has been called bacterial antagonism, bacterial interference, barrier effect, colonization resistance, and competitive exclusion. Mechanisms by which the indigenous intestinal bacteria inhibit pathogens include competition for colonization sites, competition for nutrients, production of toxic compounds, or stimulation of the immune system. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and inhibition may comprise one, several, or all of these mechanisms. Consumption of fermented foods has been associated with improved health, and lactic acid bacteria (lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) have been implicated as the causative agents for this improved health. Research over the last century has shown that lactic acid bacteria and certain other microorganisms can increase resistance to disease and that lactic acid bacteria can be enriched in the intestinal tract by feeding specific carbohydrates. Increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics in humans has caused an increase in public and governmental interest in eliminating sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics in livestock. An alternative approach to sub-therapeutic antibiotics in livestock is the use of probiotic microorganisms, prebiotic substrates that enrich certain bacterial populations, or synbiotic combinations of prebiotics and probiotics. Research is focused on identifying beneficial bacterial strains and substrates along with the conditions under which they are effective.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Burkholder, K. L. Thompson, M. E. Einstein, T. J. Applegate, and J. A. Patterson Influence of Stressors on Normal Intestinal Microbiota, Intestinal Morphology, and Susceptibility to Salmonella Enteritidis Colonization in Broilers Poult. Sci., September 1, 2008; 87(9): 1734 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Donalson, W. K. Kim, V. I. Chalova, P. Herrera, J. L. McReynolds, V. G. Gotcheva, D. Vidanovic, C. L. Woodward, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, et al. In Vitro Fermentation Response of Laying Hen Cecal Bacteria to Combinations of Fructooligosaccharide Prebiotics with Alfalfa or a Layer Ration Poult. Sci., July 1, 2008; 87(7): 1263 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Grimes, S. Rahimi, E. Oviedo, B. W. Sheldon, and F. B. O. Santos Effects of a Direct-Fed Microbial (Primalac) on Turkey Poult Performance and Susceptibility to Oral Salmonella Challenge Poult. Sci., July 1, 2008; 87(7): 1464 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Willis and L. Reid Investigating the Effects of Dietary Probiotic Feeding Regimens on Broiler Chicken Production and Campylobacter jejuni Presence Poult. Sci., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 606 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Leeson Predictions for Commercial Poultry Nutrition J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(2): 315 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. R. Castanon History of the Use of Antibiotic as Growth Promoters in European Poultry Feeds Poult. Sci., November 1, 2007; 86(11): 2466 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chichlowski, J. Croom, B. W. McBride, L. Daniel, G. Davis, and M. D. Koci Direct-Fed Microbial PrimaLac and Salinomycin Modulate Whole-Body and Intestinal Oxygen Consumption and Intestinal Mucosal Cytokine Production in the Broiler Chick Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1100 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zdunczyk, J. Juskiewicz, J. Stanczuk, J. Jankowski, and B. Krol Effect of a Kestose and Nystose Preparation on Growth Performance and Gastrointestinal Tract Function of Turkeys Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1133 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Mountzouris, P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr, and K. Fegeros Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Probiotic Containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus Strains in Promoting Broiler Performance and Modulating Cecal Microflora Composition and Metabolic Activities Poult. Sci., February 1, 2007; 86(2): 309 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Torres-Rodriguez, S. E. Higgins, J. L. S. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez, J. T. Barton, G. Tellez, A. M. Donoghue, and B. M. Hargis Effect of Lactose as a Prebiotic on Turkey Body Weight Under Commercial Conditions J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(4): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mutus, N. Kocabagli, M. Alp, N. Acar, M. Eren, and S. S. Gezen The effect of dietary probiotic supplementation on tibial bone characteristics and strength in broilers. Poult. Sci., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 1621 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-R. Liu, B. Yu, F.-H. Liu, K.-J. Cheng, and X. Zhao Expression of Rumen Microbial Fibrolytic Enzyme Genes in Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2005; 71(11): 6769 - 6775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Barbosa, C. R. Serra, R. M. La Ragione, M. J. Woodward, and A. O. Henriques Screening for Bacillus Isolates in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2005; 71(2): 968 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Smirnov, R. Perez, E. Amit-Romach, D. Sklan, and Z. Uni Mucin Dynamics and Microbial Populations in Chicken Small Intestine Are Changed by Dietary Probiotic and Antibiotic Growth Promoter Supplementation J. Nutr., February 1, 2005; 135(2): 187 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |